• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们需要做得更好:对癌症生存和生育力保存的在线患者信息的可读性分析。

We need to do better: Readability analysis of online patient information on cancer survivorship and fertility preservation.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States.

Department of Hematology and Oncology, Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States.

出版信息

J Cancer Policy. 2021 Jun;28:100276. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2021.100276. Epub 2021 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcpo.2021.100276
PMID:35559907
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

National Institute of Health recommends that patient education material should be written at no greater than 6-grade level. Cancer survivorship and fertility preservation discussion with patients is recommended by many national societies and being done more frequently. We sought to analyze online patient information on cancer survivorship and fertility preservation to see if they meet the criteria set by national guidelines.

METHODS

Online patient information on cancer survivorship and fertility preservation was collected and analyzed by six of the most common readability tests. Only websites in English and free to access were used.

RESULTS

A total of 15 separate websites for cancer survivorship and fertility preservation was used. All websites failed to meet national guidelines. Cancer survivorship information was written at a high school senior and a 12-grade level. Fertility preservation information was written at a high school-senior and junior college level.

CONCLUSION

Online patient information on cancer survivorship and fertility preservation did not meet national guidelines. Testing across six of the most used readability indexes showed that information is challenging to understand for the general patient population.

POLICY STATEMENT

This article shares an insight into the complex and growing fields of cancer survivorship and fertility preservation. Educating patients about their condition is critical and improves outcomes and participation in shared decision making. Healthcare policy should focus on implementing a system that will provide culturally and linguistically appropriate information in the community for patients about their disease.

摘要

目的

美国国立卫生研究院建议,患者教育材料的撰写难度不应超过 6 级。许多国家协会建议与患者讨论癌症生存和生育力保存问题,并更频繁地开展此类讨论。我们旨在分析癌症生存和生育力保存方面的在线患者信息,以确定其是否符合国家指南设定的标准。

方法

通过六种最常用的可读性测试收集和分析癌症生存和生育力保存方面的在线患者信息。仅使用英文且可免费访问的网站。

结果

共使用了 15 个单独的癌症生存和生育力保存网站。所有网站均未达到国家标准。癌症生存信息的撰写难度相当于高中高年级和 12 年级的水平。生育力保存信息的撰写难度相当于高中高年级和大专水平。

结论

癌症生存和生育力保存方面的在线患者信息不符合国家标准。六种最常用的可读性指标测试表明,这些信息对普通患者群体来说难以理解。

政策声明

本文深入探讨了癌症生存和生育力保存这两个复杂且不断发展的领域。教育患者了解其病情至关重要,这可以改善其治疗效果并提高其参与共同决策的程度。医疗保健政策应侧重于实施一项系统,以便在社区中为患者提供与其疾病相关的文化和语言适宜的信息。

相似文献

1
We need to do better: Readability analysis of online patient information on cancer survivorship and fertility preservation.我们需要做得更好:对癌症生存和生育力保存的在线患者信息的可读性分析。
J Cancer Policy. 2021 Jun;28:100276. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2021.100276. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
2
Websites about, not for, adolescents? A systematic analysis of online fertility preservation information for adolescent and young adult cancer patients.针对青少年的网站?还是为青少年服务的网站?青少年及青年癌症患者生育力保存相关网络信息的系统分析。
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Aug;18(4):1416-1425. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01386-1. Epub 2023 May 5.
3
Is fertility preservation a part of comprehensive cancer care in the USA? A study of NCI-designated cancer center websites.生育力保存是否是美国综合癌症护理的一部分?对 NCI 指定癌症中心网站的研究。
J Cancer Surviv. 2021 Dec;15(6):906-911. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00983-8. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
4
Evaluating the Quality and Reliability of Online Information on Social Fertility Preservation.评估社交生育力保存相关在线信息的质量和可靠性。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020 May;42(5):561-567. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.10.029. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
5
Websites about, not for, adolescents? A systematic analysis of online fertility preservation information for adolescent and young adult cancer patients.关于而非面向青少年的网站?对青少年和青年癌症患者在线生育力保存信息的系统分析。
Res Sq. 2023 Feb 16:rs.3.rs-2587513. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2587513/v1.
6
Development and testing of a tailored online fertility preservation decision aid for female cancer patients.定制化在线生育力保存决策辅助工具的开发与测试:针对女性癌症患者
Cancer Med. 2021 Mar;10(5):1576-1588. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3711. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
7
Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.足踝畸形患者的健康素养:在线患者教育材料的可阅读性、可理解性和可操作性的定量评估。
Iowa Orthop J. 2021;41(1):61-67.
8
Female fertility in the cancer setting: availability and quality of online health information.癌症环境下的女性生育力:在线健康信息的可用性和质量。
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2020 Sep;23(3):170-178. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2018.1506891. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
9
Reproductive Care of Childhood and Adolescent Cancer Survivors: A 12-Year Evaluation.儿童和青少年癌症幸存者的生殖护理:12 年评估。
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2021 Apr;10(2):131-141. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2020.0157. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
10
An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.评估关于尿道下裂治疗的在线健康信息的可读性、质量和准确性。
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Feb;15(1):40.e1-40.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.08.020. Epub 2018 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the availability, readability, and content of online patient Education materials for cancer pain interventions: A cross-sectional analysis of major cancer center websites.评估癌症疼痛干预在线患者教育材料的可获取性、可读性及内容:对主要癌症中心网站的横断面分析
Interv Pain Med. 2025 Aug 21;4(3):100633. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100633. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Clear as Mud: Readability Scores in Cloacal Exstrophy Literature and Its Treatment.晦涩难懂:泄殖腔外翻文献及其治疗中的可读性评分
Res Rep Urol. 2024 Feb 12;16:39-44. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S430744. eCollection 2024.
3
Development of a Web-Based Decision Aid and Planning Tool for Family Building After Cancer (Roadmap to Parenthood): Usability Testing.
用于癌症后生育规划的基于网络的决策辅助与规划工具(为人父母路线图)的开发:可用性测试
JMIR Cancer. 2022 May 31;8(2):e33304. doi: 10.2196/33304.