Putnam Andrea S, Ferrie Gina M, Ivy Jamie A
Department of Exhibit-Curators, San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, San Diego, California, USA.
Disney's Animals, Science and Environment, Disney's Animal Kingdom®, Lake Buena Vista, Florida, USA.
Zoo Biol. 2023 Jan;42(1):5-16. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21700. Epub 2022 May 12.
Science-based management confers a variety of benefits to wildlife populations that are cooperatively managed by zoos and aquariums, including those managed through the Association of Zoos and Aquariums. Briefly, when management strategies are successful, they result in reproductively robust populations that better retain genetic diversity and limit inbreeding than unmanaged populations. Although the benefits of demographic and genetic management have been well documented throughout both the scientific and popular literature, it has also been established that the majority of managed populations in zoos and aquariums are not meeting the minimum criteria believed to convey long-term biological viability. For most of these populations, an inability to meet viability criteria is not an inherent failure of how cooperative management is implemented. Furthermore, in recent years, we have perceived that the need to meet specific viability goals sometimes has obscured the benefits that these populations receive from rigorous, science-based management. To better clarify the conversation surrounding population viability in zoos and aquariums, we seek to decouple viability measures and how they predict population persistence from the benefits conferred to populations through science-based management. A primary goal of population management is to facilitate the persistence of priority species for longer than would be expected if no such management were implemented. Although current viability measures and future projections of viability are important tools for assessing the likelihood of population persistence, they are not indicators of which populations may most benefit from science-based management. Here, we review the history and purpose of applying science-based management to zoo and aquarium populations, describe measures of population viability and caution against confusing those measures of viability with population management goals or long-term population sustainability, and clearly articulate the benefits conferred to zoo and aquarium populations by science-based management.
基于科学的管理为动物园和水族馆合作管理的野生动物种群带来了各种益处,包括通过动物园和水族馆协会管理的种群。简而言之,当管理策略成功时,它们会带来繁殖能力强劲的种群,与未管理的种群相比,这些种群能更好地保留遗传多样性并限制近亲繁殖。尽管人口统计学和遗传管理的益处已在科学文献和大众文献中得到充分记载,但也已确定,动物园和水族馆中大多数管理的种群未达到被认为能传达长期生物生存能力的最低标准。对于这些种群中的大多数而言,无法达到生存能力标准并非合作管理实施方式本身的失败。此外,近年来,我们意识到满足特定生存能力目标的需求有时掩盖了这些种群从严格的、基于科学的管理中获得的益处。为了更好地阐明围绕动物园和水族馆种群生存能力的讨论,我们试图将生存能力衡量标准及其对种群持续性的预测与通过基于科学的管理赋予种群的益处区分开来。种群管理的一个主要目标是促进优先物种的持续存在,其持续时间要长于不实施此类管理时的预期。尽管当前的生存能力衡量标准和未来的生存能力预测是评估种群持续性可能性的重要工具,但它们并非哪些种群可能从基于科学的管理中受益最多的指标。在此,我们回顾将基于科学的管理应用于动物园和水族馆种群的历史及目的,描述种群生存能力的衡量标准,并告诫不要将这些生存能力衡量标准与种群管理目标或长期种群可持续性相混淆,同时清晰地阐明基于科学的管理赋予动物园和水族馆种群的益处。