• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国对安乐死或医师协助自杀合法化的态度:一项横断面调查。

Attitudes toward the Legalization of Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide in South Korea: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

机构信息

Department of Human Systems Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.

Department of Family Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 24;19(9):5183. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095183.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19095183
PMID:35564575
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9105789/
Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the general South Korean public attitudes toward the legalization of euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide (EAS) and examine the reasons underpinning these attitudes. From March-April 2021, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of a representative national sample of 1000 South Koreans aged 19 years or older. Three in four participants (76.4%) expressed positive attitudes toward the legalization of EAS. Participants who agreed with this legalization reported "meaninglessness of the rest of life" and "right to a good death" as their main reasons. Participants who disagreed with the legalization of EAS reported "respect for life", "violation of the right to self-determination", "risk of abuse or overuse", and "violation of human rights" as theirs. In the multivariate logistic regression analyses, participants with poor physical status (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.41, 95%; confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.93) or comorbidity (aOR: 1.84, 95%; CI: 1.19-2.83) showed positive attitudes toward the legalization of EAS. In summary, most of the general South Korean population regards the legalization of EAS positively, especially participants with poor physical status or comorbidity.

摘要

本研究旨在调查韩国公众对安乐死或医师协助自杀(EAS)合法化的普遍态度,并探讨这些态度背后的原因。2021 年 3 月至 4 月,我们对 1000 名年龄在 19 岁及以上的韩国代表性全国样本进行了横断面调查。四分之三的参与者(76.4%)对 EAS 的合法化持积极态度。赞成合法化的参与者表示,“余生无意义”和“享有善终的权利”是他们的主要理由。反对 EAS 合法化的参与者则表示,“尊重生命”、“侵犯自我决定权”、“滥用或过度使用的风险”以及“侵犯人权”是他们的理由。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,身体状况较差(调整后的优势比[aOR]:1.41,95%;置信区间[CI]:1.02-1.93)或合并症(aOR:1.84,95%;CI:1.19-2.83)的参与者对 EAS 的合法化持积极态度。总之,大多数韩国公众对 EAS 的合法化持积极态度,特别是身体状况较差或合并症的参与者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1ee/9105789/cb940105006c/ijerph-19-05183-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1ee/9105789/cb940105006c/ijerph-19-05183-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1ee/9105789/cb940105006c/ijerph-19-05183-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Attitudes toward the Legalization of Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide in South Korea: A Cross-Sectional Survey.韩国对安乐死或医师协助自杀合法化的态度:一项横断面调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 24;19(9):5183. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095183.
2
Assessing Public's Attitudes Towards Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide of Persons With Dementia Based on Their Advance Request: An Experimental Survey of US Public.基于预先请求评估公众对痴呆患者安乐死和协助自杀的态度:美国公众的实验性调查。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021 Apr;29(4):384-394. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2020.07.013. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
3
Comparison of attitudes towards five end-of-life care interventions (active pain control, withdrawal of futile life-sustaining treatment, passive euthanasia, active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide): a multicentred cross-sectional survey of Korean patients with cancer, their family caregivers, physicians and the general Korean population.对五种临终关怀干预措施(积极控制疼痛、撤销无效的维持生命治疗、被动安乐死、主动安乐死和医生协助自杀)的态度比较:对韩国癌症患者、其家庭护理人员、医生及韩国普通民众的多中心横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 11;8(9):e020519. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020519.
4
Attitudes about withholding or withdrawing life-prolonging treatment, euthanasia, assisted suicide, and physician assisted suicide: a cross-sectional survey among the general public in Croatia.关于是否停止或撤销延长生命的治疗、安乐死、协助自杀和医生协助自杀的态度:克罗地亚普通公众的横断面调查。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Feb 17;23(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00751-6.
5
Modern bioethical issues: Euthanasia, physician assisted suicide and abortion. Comparative study of attitudes between physicians and law professionals.现代生物伦理问题:安乐死、医生协助自杀与堕胎。医生与法律专业人士态度的比较研究。
Psychiatriki. 2022 Mar 28;33(1):49-55. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2021.043. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
6
Legalization of assisted suicide. A pilot study of gerontological nurses.协助自杀合法化。老年护理护士的一项试点研究。
J Gerontol Nurs. 1998 Apr;24(4):14-20; quiz 56-7. doi: 10.3928/0098-9134-19980401-07.
7
Attitudes of Michigan physicians and the public toward legalizing physician-assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia.密歇根州医生和公众对医生协助自杀合法化及自愿安乐死的态度。
N Engl J Med. 1996 Feb 1;334(5):303-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199602013340506.
8
Attitudes of cancer patients, family caregivers, oncologists and members of the general public toward critical interventions at the end of life of terminally ill patients.癌症患者、家庭护理人员、肿瘤学家和普通公众对绝症患者生命末期关键干预措施的态度。
CMAJ. 2011 Jul 12;183(10):E673-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.110020. Epub 2011 May 30.
9
Attitudes and Practices of Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide in the United States, Canada, and Europe.美国、加拿大和欧洲的安乐死和医师协助自杀态度和实践。
JAMA. 2016 Jul 5;316(1):79-90. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.8499.
10
Attitudes and behaviors on physician-assisted death: a study of Michigan oncologists.医生协助自杀的态度与行为:一项针对密歇根州肿瘤学家的研究。
J Clin Oncol. 1995 May;13(5):1055-61. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.5.1055.

引用本文的文献

1
Awareness and attitudes toward euthanasia: A cross-sectional study among diverse demographic groups in India.对安乐死的认知与态度:印度不同人口群体的横断面研究。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 Jun;14(6):2538-2543. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_175_25. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
2
Disparity in attitudes regarding assisted dying among physicians and the general public in Japan.日本医生和普通公众在对协助死亡的态度上存在差异。
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jan 20;26(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01166-9.
3
Cross-sectional survey on public attitudes and factors related to physician-assisted dying in Taiwan.

本文引用的文献

1
Medically assisted suicide in Italy: the recent judgment of the Constitutional Court.意大利的医疗协助自杀:宪法法院的最新判决。
Clin Ter. 2021 May 5;172(3):193-196. doi: 10.7417/CT.2021.2312.
2
"Love Them to Death": Dutch and Italian Experiences of (Assisted) Suicide, and the Urgent Need for Human Solidarity.《爱至死亡》:荷兰与意大利的(协助)自杀经验,以及对人类团结的迫切需要。
Issues Law Med. 2020 Fall;35(2):131-171.
3
The mediated discourse and voice of euthanasia: the Israeli media as a case study.安乐死的中介话语和声音:以以色列媒体为例。
台湾地区公众对医师协助自杀的态度及相关因素的横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 15;15(1):e089388. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089388.
4
Older adults' attitudes toward using Euthanasia at the end-of life: cancer vs. Parkinson's disease.老年人对临终使用安乐死的态度:癌症与帕金森病。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 14;12:1393535. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1393535. eCollection 2024.
5
Attitude of the Lithuanian Public toward Medical Assistance in Dying: A Cross-Sectional Study.立陶宛公众对临终医疗救助的态度:一项横断面研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 10;12(6):626. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12060626.
6
Ensuring Patients' Well-Deserved Right to Refuse Treatment, Not Jumping to an "Assisted Death With Dignity".确保患者享有拒绝治疗的应有权利,而非急于推行“尊严死”。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Jan 15;39(2):e30. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e30.
7
Beliefs and Attitudes toward Physician-assisted Suicide among Korean Adults.韩国成年人对医生协助自杀的看法和态度。
J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Dec 1;25(4):198-203. doi: 10.14475/jhpc.2022.25.4.198.
Med Humanit. 2022 Mar;48(1):76-84. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2020-012097. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
4
[Euthanasia: is this the law we need?].[安乐死:这是我们需要的法律吗?]
Aten Primaria. 2021 May;53(5):102057. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2021.102057. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
5
British laypeople's attitudes towards gradual sedation, sedation to unconsciousness and euthanasia at the end of life.英国民众对生命终末期逐渐镇静、镇静至无意识状态和安乐死的态度。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 26;16(3):e0247193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247193. eCollection 2021.
6
Attitudes Toward Euthanasia: A Longitudinal Analysis of the Role of Economic, Cultural, and Health-Related Factors.对安乐死的态度:经济、文化和健康相关因素的纵向分析。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Sep;62(3):559-569. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.01.009. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
7
Euthanasia in Belgium: Shortcomings of the Law and Its Application and of the Monitoring of Practice.比利时的安乐死:法律及其应用以及实践监督的缺陷
J Med Philos. 2021 Jan 25;46(1):80-107. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhaa031.
8
Euthanasia in the Netherlands: a claims data cross-sectional study of geographical variation.荷兰的安乐死:一项关于地理差异的索赔数据横断面研究。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 Jan 14. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002573.
9
[Legalization of medically assisted death: its potential impact on the development of palliative care].[医疗辅助死亡合法化:其对姑息治疗发展的潜在影响]
Rev Med Chil. 2020 May;148(5):665-673. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872020000500665.
10
From Reciprocity to Autonomy in Physician-Assisted Death: An Ethical Analysis of the Dutch Supreme Court Ruling in the Albert Heringa Case.从医生协助死亡中的相互性到自主性:对荷兰最高法院在艾伯特·赫林加案中裁决的伦理分析。
Am J Bioeth. 2022 Feb;22(2):51-58. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1863510. Epub 2020 Dec 23.