• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

台湾地区残疾与非残疾女性乳腺癌筛查利用不平等:基于倾向评分匹配的全国队列研究。

Inequality in the Utilization of Breast Cancer Screening between Women with and without Disabilities in Taiwan: A Propensity-Score-Matched Nationwide Cohort Study.

机构信息

Graduate Institute of Public Health, College of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung 406040, Taiwan.

Department of Health Services Administration, College of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung 406040, Taiwan.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 26;19(9):5280. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095280.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19095280
PMID:35564676
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9104314/
Abstract

Because of the difficulties in accessing medical care, the likelihood of receiving breast cancer screening may be low for women with disabilities. We aimed to investigate differences in the utilization of breast cancer screening among women with and without disabilities. Participants included women with and without disabilities from 2004 to 2010, and it was observed whether the participants had received a breast cancer screening during 2011 and 2012. Propensity-score matching was employed to match disabled women with non-disabled women (1:1). Data sources included the National Health Insurance Research Database, the Cancer Screening Database, and the Disability Registration File. Conditional logistic regression was performed to examine the odds ratios (ORs) that both groups would undergo breast cancer screening. The proportion of women with disabilities who received breast cancer screening was 18.33%, which was significantly lower than that of women without disabilities (25.52%) (p < 0.001). Women with dementia had the lowest probability of receiving a mammography examination (OR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.28−0.43), followed by those with multiple disabilities (OR = 0.43; 95% CI: 0.40−0.47) and intellectual disabilities (OR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.41−0.50). In conclusion, compared to women without disabilities, those with disabilities were less likely to undergo breast cancer screening.

摘要

由于获得医疗保健的困难,残疾女性接受乳腺癌筛查的可能性可能较低。我们旨在调查残疾女性和非残疾女性之间乳腺癌筛查利用情况的差异。参与者包括 2004 年至 2010 年的残疾女性和非残疾女性,并观察她们在 2011 年和 2012 年是否接受了乳腺癌筛查。采用倾向评分匹配将残疾女性与非残疾女性进行匹配(1:1)。数据来源包括全民健康保险研究数据库、癌症筛查数据库和残疾登记文件。采用条件逻辑回归检验两组接受乳腺癌筛查的优势比(OR)。接受乳腺癌筛查的残疾女性比例为 18.33%,明显低于非残疾女性(25.52%)(p<0.001)。患有痴呆症的女性接受乳房 X 光检查的可能性最低(OR=0.34;95%CI:0.28-0.43),其次是多重残疾女性(OR=0.43;95%CI:0.40-0.47)和智力残疾女性(OR=0.45;95%CI:0.41-0.50)。总之,与非残疾女性相比,残疾女性接受乳腺癌筛查的可能性较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e74b/9104314/ef24223abbee/ijerph-19-05280-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e74b/9104314/ef24223abbee/ijerph-19-05280-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e74b/9104314/ef24223abbee/ijerph-19-05280-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Inequality in the Utilization of Breast Cancer Screening between Women with and without Disabilities in Taiwan: A Propensity-Score-Matched Nationwide Cohort Study.台湾地区残疾与非残疾女性乳腺癌筛查利用不平等:基于倾向评分匹配的全国队列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 26;19(9):5280. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095280.
2
Mammography usage with relevant factors among women with mental disabilities in Taiwan: a nationwide population-based study.台湾智障女性乳腺摄影使用情况及其相关因素:一项基于全国人口的研究。
Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Feb;37:182-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.052. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
3
Cancer stages and mortality risk of breast cancer between women with and without disabilities: A national population-based cohort study in Taiwan.残疾与非残疾女性乳腺癌的分期和死亡率风险:台湾一项基于全国人口的队列研究。
Disabil Health J. 2024 Jul;17(3):101632. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101632. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
4
Breast cancer screening disparities between women with and without disabilities: A national database study in South Korea.乳腺癌筛查中残疾女性与非残疾女性之间的差异:韩国国家数据库研究。
Cancer. 2020 Apr 1;126(7):1522-1529. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32693. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
5
Comparison of colorectal cancer screening between people with and without disability: a nationwide matched cohort study.人群中有无残疾者的结直肠癌筛查比较:全国匹配队列研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 2;21(1):1034. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11105-z.
6
Pap, mammography, and clinical breast examination screening among women with disabilities: a systematic review.残疾女性的巴氏涂片检查、乳房 X 光检查和临床乳房检查筛查:系统评价。
Womens Health Issues. 2013 Jul-Aug;23(4):e205-14. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2013.04.002.
7
Factors influencing the mammography utilization among Taiwanese women with intellectual disabilities, a nationwide population-based study.影响台湾智障女性乳房X光摄影使用率的因素:一项基于全国人口的研究
Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Dec;35(12):3372-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.08.019.
8
Breast and cervical cancer screening disparities associated with disability severity.与残疾严重程度相关的乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查差异。
Womens Health Issues. 2014 Jan-Feb;24(1):e147-53. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2013.10.009.
9
Disparities in receipt of breast and cervical cancer screening for rural women age 18 to 64 with disabilities.18至64岁残疾农村妇女在接受乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查方面的差异。
Womens Health Issues. 2015 May-Jun;25(3):246-53. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
10
Prevalence of Cancer Screening Among Adults With Disabilities, United States, 2013.2013年美国残疾成年人癌症筛查患病率
Prev Chronic Dis. 2017 Jan 26;14:E09. doi: 10.5888/pcd14.160312.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergency colon cancer diagnosis in people with mental health conditions: a population-based cohort study in northern Italy.心理健康状况人群的急诊结肠癌诊断:意大利北部一项基于人群的队列研究
BMJ Ment Health. 2025 Jul 1;28(1):e301733. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2025-301733.
2
A Systematic Review to Evaluate the Barriers to Breast Cancer Screening in Women with Disability.一项评估残疾女性乳腺癌筛查障碍的系统评价。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 2;13(11):3283. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113283.

本文引用的文献

1
Breast cancer screening disparities between women with and without disabilities: A national database study in South Korea.乳腺癌筛查中残疾女性与非残疾女性之间的差异:韩国国家数据库研究。
Cancer. 2020 Apr 1;126(7):1522-1529. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32693. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
2
Health disparities among breast cancer patients with/without disabilities in Germany.德国残疾乳腺癌患者与非残疾乳腺癌患者的健康差异。
Disabil Health J. 2020 Apr;13(2):100873. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.100873. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
3
CAD and AI for breast cancer-recent development and challenges.
CAD 和 AI 在乳腺癌中的应用——最新进展与挑战。
Br J Radiol. 2020 Apr;93(1108):20190580. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190580. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
4
Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for 29 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2017: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.全球、区域和国家癌症发病率、死亡率、生命损失年数、失能生存年数以及 29 种癌症组别的伤残调整生命年数:1990 至 2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Dec 1;5(12):1749-1768. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2996.
5
Rates of Screening for Breast, Colorectal, and Cervical Cancers in Older People With Cognitive Impairment or Dementia: A Meta-Analysis.认知障碍或痴呆老年人的乳腺癌、结直肠癌和宫颈癌筛查率:一项荟萃分析。
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2018 Sep 18;4:2333721418799446. doi: 10.1177/2333721418799446. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
6
Disability and participation in breast and bowel cancer screening in England: a large prospective study.英格兰乳腺癌和肠癌筛查中的残疾与参与情况:一项大型前瞻性研究。
Br J Cancer. 2017 Nov 21;117(11):1711-1714. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.331. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
7
Access to healthcare for men and women with disabilities in the UK: secondary analysis of cross-sectional data.英国残疾男性和女性获得医疗保健服务情况:横断面数据的二次分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 11;7(8):e016614. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016614.
8
Self-Perceptions of Aging and Perceived Barriers to Care: Reasons for Health Care Delay.自我老化认知与感知的护理障碍:医疗延迟的原因。
Gerontologist. 2017 Aug 1;57(suppl_2):S216-S226. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx014.
9
Variations in preventive care utilisation in Europe.欧洲预防性医疗服务利用情况的差异。
Eur J Ageing. 2011 Oct 21;9(1):15-25. doi: 10.1007/s10433-011-0201-9. eCollection 2012 Mar.
10
Reducing bias using propensity score matching.使用倾向得分匹配减少偏倚。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2018 Apr;25(2):404-406. doi: 10.1007/s12350-017-1012-y. Epub 2017 Aug 3.