Collegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University, 25-369 Kielce, Poland.
1st Clinic of Cardiology and Electrotherapy, Swietokrzyskie Cardiology Centre, 25-736 Kielce, Poland.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 4;19(9):5584. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095584.
In the recent years, antithrombotic prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has changed significantly. The main aim of this study is to assess the temporal trends of antithrombotic therapy and identify factors predisposing oral anticoagulant (OAC) use in stroke prevention in AF patients.
The present study is a retrospective, observational, single-center study, which includes consecutively hospitalized patients in the reference cardiology center from January 2004 to December 2019.
A total of 9656 patients (43.7% female, mean age 71.2 years) with AF between 2004-2019 are included. Among the total study population, in most of the patients (81.1%), OAC therapy was used, antiplatelet (APT) therapy was prescribed for 13.5% patients, heparins for 2.1% patients and 3.3% of patients did not receive any stroke prevention. OAC prescription significantly increased from 61.6% in 2004 to 97.4% in 2019. The independent predictors of OAC prescription were: the period of hospitalization, non-paroxysmal AF, age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, previous thromboembolism, hospitalization due to electrical cardioversion, ablation or AF without any procedures.
In hospitalized patients with AF, during sixteen years of the study period, a significant increase in OAC use and a decrease in APT use were noted. Factors other than these included in the CHADS-VASc score were independent predictors of OAC use.
近年来,房颤(AF)患者的抗血栓预防策略发生了显著变化。本研究的主要目的是评估抗血栓治疗的时间趋势,并确定导致 AF 患者卒中预防中口服抗凝剂(OAC)使用的相关因素。
本研究为回顾性、观察性、单中心研究,纳入了 2004 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间在参考心脏病中心连续住院的患者。
共纳入了 9656 例(43.7%为女性,平均年龄 71.2 岁)2004-2019 年 AF 患者。在总研究人群中,大多数患者(81.1%)接受了 OAC 治疗,13.5%的患者接受了抗血小板(APT)治疗,2.1%的患者接受了肝素治疗,3.3%的患者未接受任何卒中预防。OAC 处方的比例从 2004 年的 61.6%显著增加到 2019 年的 97.4%。OAC 处方的独立预测因素为:住院时间、非阵发性 AF、年龄、高血压、糖尿病、既往血栓栓塞、因电复律、消融或无任何操作的 AF 住院。
在 AF 住院患者中,在研究期间的十六年中,OAC 的使用显著增加,而 APT 的使用减少。除 CHADS-VASc 评分中包含的这些因素外,其他因素也是 OAC 使用的独立预测因素。