Sengedorj Azzaya, Hader Michael, Heger Lukas, Frey Benjamin, Dudziak Diana, Fietkau Rainer, Ott Oliver J, Scheidegger Stephan, Barba Sergio Mingo, Gaipl Udo S, Rückert Michael
Translational Radiobiology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Apr 19;14(9):2050. doi: 10.3390/cancers14092050.
Hyperthermia (HT) is an accepted treatment for recurrent breast cancer which locally heats the tumor to 39-44 °C, and it is a very potent sensitizer for radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy. However, currently little is known about how HT with a distinct temperature, and particularly, how the sequence of HT and RT changes the immune phenotype of breast cancer cells. Therefore, human MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 breast cancer cells were treated with HT of different temperatures (39, 41 and 44 °C), alone and in combination with RT (2 × 5 Gy) in different sequences, with either RT or HT first, followed by the other. Tumor cell death forms and the expression of immune checkpoint molecules (ICMs) were analyzed by multicolor flow cytometry. Human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs) were differentiated and co-cultured with the treated cancer cells. In both cell lines, RT was the main stressor for cell death induction, with apoptosis being the prominent cell death form in MCF-7 cells and both apoptosis and necrosis in MDA-MB-231 cells. Here, the sequence of the combined treatments, either RT or HT, did not have a significant impact on the final outcome. The expression of all of the three examined immune suppressive ICMs, namely PD-L1, PD-L2 and HVEM, was significantly increased on MCF-7 cells 120 h after the treatment of RT with HT of any temperature. Of special interest for MDA-MB-231 cells is that only combinations of RT with HT of both 41 and 44 °C induced a significantly increased expression of PD-L2 at all examined time points (24, 48, 72, and 120 h). Generally, high dynamics of ICM expression can be observed after combined RT and HT treatments. There was no significant difference between the different sequences of treatments (either HT + RT or RT + HT) in case of the upregulation of ICMs. Furthermore, the co-culture of moDCs with tumor cells of any treatment had no impact on the expression of activation markers. We conclude that the sequence of HT and RT does not strongly affect the immune phenotype of breast cancer cells. However, when HT is combined with RT, it results in an increased expression of distinct immune suppressive ICMs that should be considered by including immune checkpoint inhibitors in multimodal tumor treatments with RT and HT. Further, combined RT and HT affects the immune system in the effector phase rather than in the priming phase.
热疗(HT)是复发性乳腺癌的一种公认治疗方法,它将肿瘤局部加热至39 - 44°C,并且是放疗(RT)和化疗的一种非常有效的增敏剂。然而,目前对于不同温度的热疗,特别是热疗和放疗的顺序如何改变乳腺癌细胞的免疫表型知之甚少。因此,用人MDA - MB - 231和MCF - 7乳腺癌细胞分别进行不同温度(39、41和44°C)的热疗,单独或与放疗(2×5 Gy)以不同顺序联合处理,即先进行放疗或热疗,然后再进行另一种治疗。通过多色流式细胞术分析肿瘤细胞死亡形式和免疫检查点分子(ICM)的表达。将人单核细胞衍生的树突状细胞(moDCs)分化并与处理后的癌细胞共培养。在两种细胞系中,放疗是诱导细胞死亡的主要应激源,在MCF - 7细胞中凋亡是主要的细胞死亡形式,而在MDA - MB - 231细胞中凋亡和坏死均有发生。在此,联合治疗的顺序,无论是放疗还是热疗,对最终结果没有显著影响。在MCF - 7细胞中,用任何温度的热疗联合放疗处理120小时后,所检测的三种免疫抑制性ICM,即程序性死亡受体配体1(PD - L1)、程序性死亡受体配体2(PD - L2)和疱疹病毒进入介质(HVEM)的表达均显著增加。对于MDA - MB - 231细胞特别值得关注的是,仅41°C和44°C热疗与放疗的联合在所有检测时间点(24、48、72和120小时)均诱导PD - L2表达显著增加。一般来说,放疗和热疗联合处理后可观察到ICM表达的高度动态变化。在ICM上调的情况下,不同治疗顺序(热疗 + 放疗或放疗 + 热疗)之间没有显著差异。此外,moDCs与任何处理的肿瘤细胞共培养对激活标志物的表达没有影响。我们得出结论,热疗和放疗的顺序对乳腺癌细胞的免疫表型没有强烈影响。然而,当热疗与放疗联合时,会导致特定免疫抑制性ICM表达增加,在放疗和热疗的多模式肿瘤治疗中纳入免疫检查点抑制剂时应予以考虑。此外,放疗和热疗联合在效应阶段而非启动阶段影响免疫系统。