Stonebridge Morgan, Evans Di, Kotzmann Jane
LLB (Hons), Research Assistant, Deakin Law School, Burwood, Melbourne, VIC 3125, Australia.
Science Team, RSPCA Australia, Deakin, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.
Animals (Basel). 2022 Apr 20;12(9):1071. doi: 10.3390/ani12091071.
Animal sentience is recognised either implicitly or explicitly in legislation in all Australian states and territories. In these jurisdictions, animal welfare legislation prohibits acts of cruelty towards animals because animals have the capacity to experience pain or suffering. This acknowledgement is supported by scientific research that demonstrates animal sentience, as well as public opinion. Despite these legal prohibitions, calf-roping, a common event at rodeos, is permitted in the majority of Australian jurisdictions. In recent times, calf-roping has generated significant public concern due to the potential for injury, pain or distress for the calves involved. This concern is evidently shared in some overseas jurisdictions, such as New Zealand, where animal advocacy organisations have filed a legal challenge asserting that rodeo events violate New Zealand's animal welfare legislation due to the pain and distress inflicted on the animals. This commentary discusses these welfare concerns, the legislative inconsistencies between Australian jurisdictions and the problematic legal status of calf-roping in Australia.
在澳大利亚所有州和领地的立法中,动物感知能力都得到了隐性或显性的认可。在这些司法管辖区,动物福利立法禁止对动物的残忍行为,因为动物有能力体验疼痛或痛苦。这一认知得到了证明动物感知能力的科学研究以及公众舆论的支持。尽管有这些法律禁令,但在澳大利亚大多数司法管辖区,牛仔竞技表演中常见的套小牛活动仍被允许。近年来,由于套小牛活动可能给参与其中的小牛带来伤害、疼痛或痛苦,这一活动引发了公众的广泛关注。显然,一些海外司法管辖区也有同样的担忧,比如新西兰,动物权益倡导组织已提起法律诉讼,声称牛仔竞技活动因给动物造成疼痛和痛苦而违反了新西兰的动物福利立法。本评论探讨了这些福利问题、澳大利亚各司法管辖区之间立法的不一致之处以及澳大利亚套小牛活动存在问题的法律地位。