Proctor Helen S, Carder Gemma, Cornish Amelia R
World Society for the Protection of Animals, 222 Grays Inn Rd., London, WC1X 8HB, UK.
Animals (Basel). 2013 Sep 4;3(3):882-906. doi: 10.3390/ani3030882.
Knowledge of animal sentience is fundamental to many disciplines and imperative to the animal welfare movement. In this review, we examined what is being explored and discussed, regarding animal sentience, within the scientific literature. Rather than attempting to extract meaning from the many complex and abstract definitions of animal sentience, we searched over two decades of scientific literature using a peer-reviewed list of 174 keywords. The list consisted of human emotions, terminology associated with animal sentience, and traits often thought to be indicative of subjective states. We discovered that very little was actually being explored, and instead there was already much agreement about what animals can feel. Why then is there so much scepticism surrounding the science of animal sentience? Sentience refers to the subjective states of animals, and so is often thought to be impossible to measure objectively. However, when we consider that much of the research found to accept and utilise animal sentience is performed for the development of human drugs and treatment, it appears that measuring sentience is, after all, not quite as impossible as was previously thought. In this paper, we explored what has been published on animal sentience in the scientific literature and where the gaps in research lie. We drew conclusions on the implications for animal welfare science and argued for the importance of addressing these gaps in our knowledge. We found that there is a need for more research on positive emotional states in animals, and that there is still much to learn about taxa such as invertebrates. Such information will not only be useful in supporting and initiating legislative amendments but will help to increase understanding, and potentially positive actions and attitudes towards animals.
动物感知能力的知识对许多学科都至关重要,对动物福利运动来说更是必不可少。在本综述中,我们研究了科学文献中关于动物感知能力正在探讨和讨论的内容。我们并非试图从众多复杂抽象的动物感知能力定义中提取含义,而是使用一份经同行评审的包含174个关键词的列表,搜索了二十多年的科学文献。该列表包括人类情感、与动物感知能力相关的术语,以及通常被认为能表明主观状态的特征。我们发现实际上对此探索得很少,相反,对于动物能感知什么已经有了很多共识。那么,为什么围绕动物感知能力科学存在如此多的怀疑呢?感知能力指动物的主观状态,因此常被认为无法客观测量。然而,当我们考虑到许多被发现接受并利用动物感知能力的研究是为了人类药物和治疗的开发而进行时,似乎测量感知能力毕竟并非像之前认为的那样不可能。在本文中,我们探讨了科学文献中已发表的关于动物感知能力的内容以及研究中的差距所在。我们得出了对动物福利科学的影响的结论,并主张填补我们知识空白的重要性。我们发现需要对动物的积极情绪状态进行更多研究,而且对于无脊椎动物等分类群仍有很多需要了解的。这些信息不仅有助于支持和发起立法修订,还将有助于增进理解,并可能改善对动物的积极行动和态度。