• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食物不安全营养激励对家庭水果和蔬菜支出的影响。

Impact of Food Insecurity Nutrition Incentives on Household Fruit and Vegetable Expenditures.

机构信息

Westat, Rockville, MD.

Westat, Rockville, MD.

出版信息

J Nutr Educ Behav. 2021 May;53(5):418-427. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2020.10.022. Epub 2021 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.jneb.2020.10.022
PMID:33526387
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the impact of the Food Insecurity Nutrition Incentive (FINI) grant program on self-reported fruit and vegetable (FV) expenditures.

DESIGN

Pre-post quasi-experimental study design.

SETTING

Farmers markets and grocery stores in states with FINI projects.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 2,471 Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) households in 4 intervention groups who lived near a FINI retailer (farmers market or grocery store) and 4 matched comparison groups who did not live near a FINI retailer.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Awareness and use of point-of-sale incentives and changes in self-reported monthly household FV expenditures.

ANALYSIS

Ordinary least squares intent-to-treat regression model using lagged dependent variable model framework.

RESULTS

Awareness of FINI was higher among households who were near a FINI retailer and had shopped there before FINI than those who lived near a FINI retailer but had not shopped there before FINI; the number of information sources from which SNAP participants heard about FINI was positively associated with incentive receipt (P < 0.05). Among those who received incentives, the average amount of incentives received at the last shopping trip ranged from $15 to $23. The FINI program had a positive impact on the average monthly FV expenditures for those in the farmers market shopper, grocery store shopper, and grocery store general intervention groups-increases ranged from $9 to $15 (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Point-of-sale incentives were associated with an increase in FV expenditures among SNAP households. Further research is needed to examine (1) effective messaging strategies to increase incentive awareness and (2) the long-term impact of incentives on FV expenditures.

摘要

目的

评估食品保障营养激励(FINI)拨款计划对自我报告的水果和蔬菜(FV)支出的影响。

设计

前后准实验研究设计。

设置

有 FINI 项目的州的农贸市场和杂货店。

参与者

共有 2471 户参与补充营养援助计划(SNAP)的家庭,分为 4 个干预组,这些家庭居住在 FINI 零售商(农贸市场或杂货店)附近,另有 4 个匹配的对照组,这些家庭不居住在 FINI 零售商附近。

主要观察指标

对销售点激励措施的意识和使用以及自我报告的每月家庭 FV 支出的变化。

分析

使用滞后因变量模型框架的普通最小二乘法意向治疗回归模型。

结果

在 FINI 零售商附近居住且之前在 FINI 零售商购物过的家庭对 FINI 的认识度更高,而那些居住在 FINI 零售商附近但之前没有在 FINI 零售商购物过的家庭对 FINI 的认识度较低;SNAP 参与者从哪些信息来源听说过 FINI 与获得激励措施呈正相关(P < 0.05)。在获得激励措施的人中,在上一次购物旅行中收到的激励措施的平均金额在 15 美元到 23 美元之间。FINI 计划对农贸市场购物者、杂货店购物者和杂货店一般干预组的家庭的平均每月 FV 支出产生了积极影响-增加额在 9 美元到 15 美元之间(P < 0.05)。

结论和意义

销售点激励措施与 SNAP 家庭 FV 支出的增加有关。需要进一步研究(1)提高激励措施意识的有效信息传递策略,以及(2)激励措施对 FV 支出的长期影响。

相似文献

1
Impact of Food Insecurity Nutrition Incentives on Household Fruit and Vegetable Expenditures.食物不安全营养激励对家庭水果和蔬菜支出的影响。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2021 May;53(5):418-427. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2020.10.022. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
2
Opportunities and Challenges of California's Fruit and Vegetable Electronic Benefit Transfer Pilot Project at Farmers' Markets: A Qualitative Study with Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Shoppers and Farmers' Market Staff.加利福尼亚州农贸市场水果和蔬菜电子福利转账试点项目的机遇与挑战:对补充营养援助计划购物者和农贸市场工作人员的定性研究。
Nutrients. 2024 Oct 5;16(19):3388. doi: 10.3390/nu16193388.
3
Understanding Impacts of SNAP Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Program at Farmers' Markets: Findings from a 13 State RCT.理解 SNAP 水果和蔬菜激励计划在农贸市场的影响:来自 13 个州 RCT 的发现。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 17;19(12):7443. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127443.
4
Food Insecurity Nutrition Incentive Grant Program: Implications for the 2018 Farm Bill and Future Directions.粮食不安全营养激励补助计划:对 2018 年农业法案和未来方向的影响。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Mar;119(3):395-399. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.12.005. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
5
Reducing food insecurity and improving fruit and vegetable intake through a nutrition incentive program in Michigan, USA.通过美国密歇根州的一项营养激励计划减少粮食不安全状况并改善水果和蔬菜摄入量。
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Aug 17;15:100898. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100898. eCollection 2021 Sep.
6
Comparison of Fruit and Vegetable Prices between Farmers' Markets and Supermarkets: Implications for Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Programs for Food Assistance Program Participants.农贸市场和超市的果蔬价格比较:对食品援助计划参与者的果蔬激励计划的启示。
Nutrients. 2022 Apr 28;14(9):1842. doi: 10.3390/nu14091842.
7
Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Programs for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Participants: A Scoping Review of Program Structure.果蔬激励计划对补充营养援助计划(SNAP)参与者的影响:计划结构的范围综述。
Nutrients. 2020 Jun 4;12(6):1676. doi: 10.3390/nu12061676.
8
Healthy Food Incentive Programs: Findings From Food Insecurity Nutrition Incentive Programs Across the United States.健康食品激励计划:美国各地粮食不安全营养激励计划的调查结果
Health Promot Pract. 2020 May;21(3):421-429. doi: 10.1177/1524839919898207. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
9
Racial/Ethnic Differences in the Shopping Behaviors and Fruit and Vegetable Consumption of Farmers' Market Incentive Program Users in Illinois.伊利诺伊州农贸市场激励计划使用者的购物行为和果蔬消费的种族/民族差异。
Ethn Dis. 2020 Jan 16;30(1):109-118. doi: 10.18865/ed.30.1.109. eCollection 2020 Winter.
10
Predictors of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Use at Farmers' Markets With Monetary Incentive Programming.具有货币激励计划的农贸市场中补充营养援助计划使用的预测因素。
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Sep;33(7):1039-1048. doi: 10.1177/0890117119854708. Epub 2019 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Opportunities and Challenges of California's Fruit and Vegetable Electronic Benefit Transfer Pilot Project at Farmers' Markets: A Qualitative Study with Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Shoppers and Farmers' Market Staff.加利福尼亚州农贸市场水果和蔬菜电子福利转账试点项目的机遇与挑战:对补充营养援助计划购物者和农贸市场工作人员的定性研究。
Nutrients. 2024 Oct 5;16(19):3388. doi: 10.3390/nu16193388.
2
Which Program Implementation Factors Lead to more Fruit and Vegetable Purchases? An Exploratory Analysis of Nutrition Incentive Programs across the United States.哪些项目实施因素会促使人们购买更多水果和蔬菜?对美国营养激励项目的探索性分析。
Curr Dev Nutr. 2023 Nov 22;7(12):102040. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2023.102040. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Advancing Equity in the Farm Bill: Opportunities for the Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program (GusNIP).推进《农业法案》中的公平性:格斯·舒默营养激励计划(GusNIP)的机会。
Nutrients. 2023 Nov 21;15(23):4863. doi: 10.3390/nu15234863.
4
Sugar-sweetened beverage intake and convenience store shopping as mediators of the food insecurity-Tooth decay relationship among low-income children in Washington state.在华盛顿州,低收入儿童的食物不安全感与龋齿之间的关系中,含糖饮料摄入和便利店购物作为中介因素。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 12;18(9):e0290287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290287. eCollection 2023.
5
Diet and Food and Nutrition Insecurity and Cardiometabolic Disease.饮食、食物与营养不安全和心血管代谢疾病。
Circ Res. 2023 Jun 9;132(12):1692-1706. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.123.322065. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
6
The impact of a healthy checkout intervention on fruit and vegetable 'micro-pack' purchases in New Mexico.一项健康结账干预措施对新墨西哥州水果和蔬菜“微型包装”购买行为的影响。
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Sep 12;25(12):1-9. doi: 10.1017/S1368980022002026.
7
The California Nutrition Incentive Program: Participants' Perceptions and Associations with Produce Purchases, Consumption, and Food Security.加利福尼亚营养激励计划:参与者对购买、消费农产品和食品安全的看法及关联。
Nutrients. 2022 Jun 29;14(13):2699. doi: 10.3390/nu14132699.
8
How Does the Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program Work? A Theory of Change.古斯曼·舒马赫营养激励计划是如何运作的?一个变革理论。
Nutrients. 2022 May 11;14(10):2018. doi: 10.3390/nu14102018.
9
Comparison of Fruit and Vegetable Prices between Farmers' Markets and Supermarkets: Implications for Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Programs for Food Assistance Program Participants.农贸市场和超市的果蔬价格比较:对食品援助计划参与者的果蔬激励计划的启示。
Nutrients. 2022 Apr 28;14(9):1842. doi: 10.3390/nu14091842.
10
A Preliminary Evaluation of Virginia Fresh Match: Impacts and Demographic Considerations for Future Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Programs.弗吉尼亚新鲜匹配初步评估:对未来水果和蔬菜激励计划的影响和人口统计考虑。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 5;19(7):4367. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074367.