• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

危重症患者拔管结局的预测模型:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。

Prediction Model of Extubation Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Tanaka Aiko, Kabata Daijiro, Hirao Osamu, Kosaka Junko, Furushima Nana, Maki Yuichi, Uchiyama Akinori, Egi Moritoki, Shintani Ayumi, Morimatsu Hiroshi, Mizobuchi Satoshi, Kotake Yoshifumi, Fujino Yuji

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita 565-0871, Japan.

Department of Medical Statistics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1-4-3 Asahimachi, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8585, Japan.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 29;11(9):2520. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092520.

DOI:10.3390/jcm11092520
PMID:35566646
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9102390/
Abstract

Liberation from mechanical ventilation is of great importance owing to related complications from extended ventilation time. In this prospective multicenter study, we aimed to construct a versatile model for predicting extubation outcomes in critical care settings using obtainable physiological predictors. The study included patients who had been extubated after a successful 30 min spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to predict extubation outcomes (successful extubation without reintubation and uneventful extubation without reintubation or noninvasive respiratory support) using eight parameters: age, heart failure, respiratory disease, rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI), PaO2/FIO2, Glasgow Coma Scale score, fluid balance, and endotracheal suctioning episodes. Of 499 patients, 453 (90.8%) and 328 (65.7%) achieved successful and uneventful extubation, respectively. The areas under the curve for successful and uneventful extubation in the novel prediction model were 0.69 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.62−0.77) and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.65−0.74), respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the conventional model solely using RSBI (0.58 (95% CI, 0.50−0.66) and 0.54 (95% CI, 0.49−0.60), p = 0.004 and <0.001, respectively). The model was validated using a bootstrap method, and an online application was developed for automatic calculation. Our model, which is based on a combination of generally obtainable parameters, established an accessible method for predicting extubation outcomes after a successful SBT.

摘要

由于机械通气时间延长会引发相关并发症,因此脱离机械通气至关重要。在这项前瞻性多中心研究中,我们旨在利用可获取的生理预测指标构建一个通用模型,以预测重症监护环境中的拔管结果。该研究纳入了在成功进行30分钟自主呼吸试验(SBT)后拔管的患者。构建了一个多变量逻辑回归模型,使用八个参数预测拔管结果(成功拔管且无需重新插管以及顺利拔管且无需重新插管或无创呼吸支持):年龄、心力衰竭、呼吸系统疾病、快速浅呼吸指数(RSBI)、动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分数值(PaO2/FIO2)、格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分、液体平衡和气管内吸痰次数。499例患者中,分别有453例(90.8%)和328例(65.7%)成功拔管且过程顺利。新预测模型中成功拔管和顺利拔管的曲线下面积分别为0.69(95%置信区间(CI),0.62 - 0.77)和0.70(95%CI,0.65 - 0.74),显著高于仅使用RSBI的传统模型(0.58(95%CI,0.50 - 0.66)和0.54(95%CI,0.49 - 0.60),p分别为0.004和<0.001)。使用自助法对该模型进行了验证,并开发了一个在线应用程序用于自动计算。我们的模型基于通常可获取的参数组合,建立了一种预测成功SBT后拔管结果的可及方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c7/9102390/da3f936c6a65/jcm-11-02520-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c7/9102390/8ff15ee7e52a/jcm-11-02520-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c7/9102390/721a79851c9e/jcm-11-02520-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c7/9102390/2d16070b4cc0/jcm-11-02520-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c7/9102390/051a489b5d76/jcm-11-02520-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c7/9102390/da3f936c6a65/jcm-11-02520-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c7/9102390/8ff15ee7e52a/jcm-11-02520-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c7/9102390/721a79851c9e/jcm-11-02520-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c7/9102390/2d16070b4cc0/jcm-11-02520-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c7/9102390/051a489b5d76/jcm-11-02520-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c7/9102390/da3f936c6a65/jcm-11-02520-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction Model of Extubation Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.危重症患者拔管结局的预测模型:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 29;11(9):2520. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092520.
2
A decision-tree model for predicting extubation outcome in elderly patients after a successful spontaneous breathing trial.用于预测成功自主呼吸试验后老年患者拔管结局的决策树模型。
Anesth Analg. 2010 Nov;111(5):1211-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181f4e82e. Epub 2010 Sep 14.
3
An Integrative Index for Predicting Extubation Outcomes After Successful Completion of a Spontaneous Breathing Trial in an Adult Medical Intensive Care Unit.成人重症监护病房自主呼吸试验成功后拔管结局的综合预测指数。
J Intensive Care Med. 2019 Aug;34(8):640-645. doi: 10.1177/0885066617706688. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
4
Predictors of extubation outcome in patients who have successfully completed a spontaneous breathing trial.成功完成自主呼吸试验的患者拔管结果的预测因素。
Chest. 2001 Oct;120(4):1262-70. doi: 10.1378/chest.120.4.1262.
5
Prediction of extubation outcome in mechanically ventilated patients: Development and validation of the Extubation Predictive Score (ExPreS).机械通气患者拔管结局预测:拔管预测评分(ExPreS)的建立和验证。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 18;16(3):e0248868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248868. eCollection 2021.
6
Reconnection to mechanical ventilation for 1 h after a successful spontaneous breathing trial reduces reintubation in critically ill patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.经自主呼吸试验成功后重新连接机械通气 1 小时可降低危重症患者的再插管率:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Nov;43(11):1660-1667. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4911-0. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
7
Predictors of reintubation in critically ill patients.危重症患者再次插管的预测因素。
Respir Care. 2014 Feb;59(2):178-85. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02527. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
8
Clinical utility of rapid shallow breathing index in predicting successful weaning: secondary analysis of the COBRE-US trial.快速浅呼吸指数预测撤机成功的临床效用:COBRE-US试验的二次分析
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2025 Feb;49(2):72-77. doi: 10.1016/j.medine.2024.06.007. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
9
Evolution of pattern of breathing during a spontaneous breathing trial predicts successful extubation.自主呼吸试验期间呼吸模式的演变可预测拔管成功。
Intensive Care Med. 2010 Mar;36(3):487-95. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1735-6. Epub 2009 Nov 28.
10
Does diaphragm ultrasound improve the rapid shallow breathing index accuracy for predicting the success of weaning from mechanical ventilation?膈肌超声能否提高快速浅呼吸指数在预测机械通气撤机成功方面的准确性?
Aust Crit Care. 2022 May;35(3):233-240. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2021.05.008. Epub 2021 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical predictors of extubation failure in postoperative critically ill patients: a post-hoc analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study.术后重症患者拔管失败的临床预测因素:一项多中心前瞻性观察性研究的事后分析
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Mar 15;25(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-02996-1.
2
Position Statement of ISCCM Committee on Weaning from Mechanical Ventilator.国际危重症护理医学学会机械通气撤机委员会立场声明
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Aug;28(Suppl 2):S233-S248. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24716. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
3
Time definition of reintubation most relevant to patient outcomes in critically ill patients: a multicenter cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of post-extubation stridor in patients on mechanical ventilation: a prospective observational study.机械通气患者拔管后喘鸣的预测因素:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 7;11(1):19993. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99501-8.
2
Protocolized Postextubation Respiratory Support to Prevent Reintubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.程序化拔管后呼吸支持预防再插管:一项随机临床试验。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Aug 1;204(3):294-302. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202009-3561OC.
3
Prediction of extubation outcome in mechanically ventilated patients: Development and validation of the Extubation Predictive Score (ExPreS).
再插管时间对危重症患者患者结局最相关的定义:一项多中心队列研究。
Crit Care. 2023 Sep 30;27(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04668-3.
4
2022 Year in Review: Ventilator Liberation.2022 年年鉴:呼吸机撤离。
Respir Care. 2023 Nov 25;68(12):1728-1735. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11114.
机械通气患者拔管结局预测:拔管预测评分(ExPreS)的建立和验证。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 18;16(3):e0248868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248868. eCollection 2021.
4
A practical method for dealing with missing Glasgow Coma Scale verbal component scores.一种处理格拉斯哥昏迷量表语言部分缺失评分的实用方法。
J Neurosurg. 2020 Sep 8;135(1):214-219. doi: 10.3171/2020.6.JNS20992. Print 2021 Jul 1.
5
Influence of Arterial Blood Gas to Guide Extubation in Intensive Care Unit Patients after Spontaneous Breathing Trial.动脉血气对 ICU 患者自主呼吸试验后拔管的影响。
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2020 Apr 19;18(1):21-26. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v18i1.2114.
6
Variable selection strategies and its importance in clinical prediction modelling.变量选择策略及其在临床预测模型中的重要性。
Fam Med Community Health. 2020 Feb 16;8(1):e000262. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2019-000262. eCollection 2020.
7
Predictors of Successful Extubation in Reintubated Patients: The Impact of Fluid Balance during the 24 Hours Prior to Extubation.再次插管患者成功拔管的预测因素:拔管前24小时内液体平衡的影响。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2019 Jul;23(7):344-345. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23212.
8
Experts' guidelines of intubation and extubation of the ICU patient of French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR) and French-speaking Intensive Care Society (SRLF) : In collaboration with the pediatric Association of French-speaking Anaesthetists and Intensivists (ADARPEF), French-speaking Group of Intensive Care and Paediatric emergencies (GFRUP) and Intensive Care physiotherapy society (SKR).法国麻醉与重症医学学会(SFAR)及法语区重症监护学会(SRLF)关于ICU患者气管插管与拔管的专家指南:与法语区麻醉师和重症医师协会(ADARPEF)、法语区重症监护与儿科急诊组(GFRUP)以及重症监护物理治疗学会(SKR)合作制定
Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Jan 22;9(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0483-1.
9
Non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen therapy: When to choose one over the other?无创通气或高流量氧疗:何时选择其一?
Respirology. 2019 Aug;24(8):724-731. doi: 10.1111/resp.13435. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
10
High-flow nasal cannula in adults with acute respiratory failure and after extubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.高流量鼻导管在急性呼吸衰竭和拔管后的成人中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Respir Res. 2018 Oct 16;19(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12931-018-0908-7.