• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

假性剥脱性青光眼的房角切开术。它仍能被视为一个好的选择吗?

Canaloplasty in Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma. Can It Still Be Considered a Good Choice?

作者信息

Brusini Paolo, Papa Veronica, Zeppieri Marco

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Policlinico Città di Udine, Viale Venezia 410, 33100 Udine, Italy.

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 30;11(9):2532. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092532.

DOI:10.3390/jcm11092532
PMID:35566656
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9105440/
Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the long-term outcomes of canaloplasty surgery in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PEXG) patients. Material and Methods: A total of 116 PEXG patients with an intraocular pressure (IOP) > 21 mm/Hg and maximum tolerated local medical therapy who underwent canaloplasty from February 2008 to January 2022 were considered. Every six months, all subjects underwent a complete ophthalmic examination. The period of follow-up ranged from 2 to 167 months. Inclusion criteria included only patients for whom the entire procedure could be completed with a follow-up of at least 2 years. Results: Amongst the 116 PEXG patients, the entire procedure could not be performed in 10 eyes (8.6%), and thus they were not considered in the analysis. Twenty-three patients did not reach the two-year follow-up and another 16 patients during this time period were lost. A total of 67 patients with a mean follow-up of 49 ± 32.3 months were considered in the analysis. The pre-operative mean IOP was 31.2 ± 8.7 mm/Hg (range 20−60). The mean IOP at the two-year follow-up was 17.2 ± 6.7 mmHg, with a mean reduction from baseline of 44.9%. After two years, the qualified success rates according to three different criteria (IOP ≤ 21, ≤18 and ≤16 mmHg) were 80.6%, 73.1% and 61.0%, respectively. The total number of medications used pre- and at the follow-up at 2 years was 3.5 ± 0.8 and 1.2 ± 1.4, respectively. Early complications included: hyphema, in about 30% of cases; Descemet membrane detachment (4.9%); and IOP spikes > 10 mmHg (9.7%). A late failure with an acute IOP rise of up to 50 mmHg was observed in 41 cases (61.2%) after 3 to 72 months. Conclusions: Long-term post-operative outcomes of canaloplasty in PEXG patients appear to be quite good on average; however, an acute rise in IOP can be observed in more than 60% of the cases after a long period of satisfactory IOP control. For this reason, canaloplasty may not be suitable in eyes with PEXG, especially in patients with severe functional damage.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估剥脱性青光眼(PEXG)患者行睫状体光凝术的长期疗效。材料与方法:纳入2008年2月至2022年1月期间接受睫状体光凝术的116例PEXG患者,这些患者眼压(IOP)>21 mmHg且接受了最大耐受量的局部药物治疗。每6个月对所有受试者进行一次全面的眼科检查。随访时间为2至167个月。纳入标准仅包括整个手术能够完成且随访至少2年的患者。结果:在116例PEXG患者中,10只眼(8.6%)无法完成整个手术,因此未纳入分析。23例患者未达到2年随访,在此期间另有16例患者失访。分析中纳入了67例患者,平均随访时间为49±32.3个月。术前平均眼压为31.2±8.7 mmHg(范围20−60)。2年随访时的平均眼压为17.2±6.7 mmHg,较基线平均降低44.9%。2年后,根据三种不同标准(IOP≤21、≤18和≤16 mmHg)的合格成功率分别为80.6%、73.1%和61.0%。术前及2年随访时使用的药物总数分别为3.5±0.8和1.2±1.4。早期并发症包括:约30%的病例出现前房积血;后弹力层脱离(4.9%);眼压峰值>10 mmHg(9.7%)。3至72个月后,41例(61.2%)患者出现急性眼压升高至50 mmHg的晚期失败情况。结论:PEXG患者行睫状体光凝术的术后长期疗效总体似乎相当不错;然而,在长时间眼压控制良好后,超过60%的病例可观察到眼压急性升高。因此,睫状体光凝术可能不适用于PEXG患者的眼睛,尤其是功能损害严重的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1376/9105440/49ce5822fca5/jcm-11-02532-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1376/9105440/211aaabf9da9/jcm-11-02532-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1376/9105440/9c14049e2909/jcm-11-02532-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1376/9105440/49ce5822fca5/jcm-11-02532-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1376/9105440/211aaabf9da9/jcm-11-02532-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1376/9105440/9c14049e2909/jcm-11-02532-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1376/9105440/49ce5822fca5/jcm-11-02532-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Canaloplasty in Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma. Can It Still Be Considered a Good Choice?假性剥脱性青光眼的房角切开术。它仍能被视为一个好的选择吗?
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 30;11(9):2532. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092532.
2
Canaloplasty in Corticosteroid-Induced Glaucoma. Preliminary Results.皮质类固醇性青光眼的房角切开术。初步结果。
J Clin Med. 2018 Feb 11;7(2):31. doi: 10.3390/jcm7020031.
3
Ab externo canaloplasty results and efficacy: a retrospective cohort study with a 12-month follow-up.外路巩膜瓣下小梁切开术的结果与疗效:一项为期12个月随访的回顾性队列研究。
Eye Vis (Lond). 2019 Mar 12;6:9. doi: 10.1186/s40662-019-0134-5. eCollection 2019.
4
[Preliminary efficacy of penetrating canaloplasty in primary angle-closure glaucoma].穿透性小梁切除术在原发性闭角型青光眼中的初步疗效
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jun 11;55(6):448-453. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2019.06.008.
5
Canaloplasty in Open-angle Glaucoma: Mid-term Results From a Multicenter Study.开角型青光眼的房角成形术:一项多中心研究的中期结果
J Glaucoma. 2016 May;25(5):403-7. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000103.
6
The Efficacy of Ab Externo Canaloplasty by Using a Nonabsorbable Suture and No Viscoelastics; IOP Results, Intraoperative and Early Complication Rates within 6-Month Follow-Up Period.非可吸收缝线和非黏弹剂行外路房水引流管植入术的疗效:6 个月随访期间的眼压结果、术中及早期并发症发生率。
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2021 Apr;238(4):380-390. doi: 10.1055/a-1386-3170. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
7
Outcomes of 360° suture trabeculotomy after unsuccessful canaloplasty.小梁切开术后 360° 缝线失败的结果。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Feb;258(2):387-393. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04545-2. Epub 2019 Dec 7.
8
Outcomes of Phaco-viscocanalostomy in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma versus Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma.原发性开角型青光眼与假性剥脱性青光眼行超声乳化小梁切开术的疗效比较
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2021 Oct 25;16(4):566-573. doi: 10.18502/jovr.v16i4.9746. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.
9
Comparison of long-term results of trabeculectomy and phacotrabeculectomy in patients with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma: a single-center study.超声乳化白内障吸除联合小梁切除术与小梁切除术治疗原发性开角型青光眼合并假性剥脱综合征的长期疗效比较:单中心研究。
Int Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun;42(6):1737-1747. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-02169-2. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
10
Efficacy of bleb-independent penetrating canaloplasty in primary angle-closure glaucoma: one-year results.非滤过泡性穿透性房角成形术治疗原发性闭角型青光眼的疗效:一年结果
Acta Ophthalmol. 2022 Feb;100(1):e213-e220. doi: 10.1111/aos.14869. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Ten-Year Results After Canaloplasty and Phacocanaloplasty.小梁切除术和房角切开式小梁切除术的十年结果。
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 4;14(7):2481. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072481.
2
Ab externo Schlemm's canal surgery: Efficacy and safety outcomes.外路施莱姆管手术:疗效与安全性结果。
Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2024 Dec 26;38(4):322-331. doi: 10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_159_24. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
3
Historical and Contemporary Debates in Schlemm's Canal-Based MIGS.基于施莱姆管的微切口白内障手术的历史与当代争论

本文引用的文献

1
Canaloplasty - Efficacy and Safety in an 18-Month Follow Up Period, and Analysis of Outcomes in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Pigmentary Glaucoma and Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma.经通道成形术治疗的 18 个月随访结果,原发性开角型青光眼、色素性青光眼和假性剥脱性青光眼的疗效和安全性分析。
Semin Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul 4;37(5):602-610. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2022.2034897. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
2
Lower Success in Trabeculectomies in Exfoliation Compared With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma Patients in Sweden.在瑞典,与原发性开角型青光眼患者相比,原发性开角型青光眼患者小梁切除术成功率较低。
J Glaucoma. 2021 May 1;30(5):e237-e245. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001818.
3
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 19;13(16):4882. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164882.
4
Long-term outcomes of canaloplasty and phaco-canaloplasty in the treatment of open angle glaucoma: a single-surgeon experience.超声睫状体成形术和超声乳化白内障吸除术联合房角分离术治疗开角型青光眼的长期疗效:单中心经验。
Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul 7;44(1):317. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03174-x.
5
Canaloplasty in the spotlight: surgical alternatives and future perspectives.可调节缝线小梁切除术:手术选择及未来展望。
Rom J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul-Sep;66(3):225-232. doi: 10.22336/rjo.2022.44.
6
It Is All about Pressure.一切都与压力有关。
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 23;11(13):3640. doi: 10.3390/jcm11133640.
Surgical Management of Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma: A Review of Current Clinical Considerations and Surgical Outcomes.
超声乳化白内障吸除术治疗原发性闭角型青光眼合并白内障的疗效观察
J Glaucoma. 2021 Mar 1;30(3):e32-e39. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001724.
4
Outcomes of gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy in pseudoexfoliative glaucoma: 24-month follow-up.超声乳化白内障吸除联合小梁切除术治疗晶状体不全脱位继发青光眼的临床观察
Br J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul;105(7):977-982. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-315954. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
5
Canaloplasty with Suprachoroidal Drainage in Patients with Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma - Four Years Results.剥脱性青光眼患者行脉络膜上腔引流的巩膜瓣下小梁切除术——四年结果
Curr Eye Res. 2021 Feb;46(2):217-223. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2020.1795203. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
6
The Effects of Trabeculectomy on Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma and Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.小梁切除术对假性剥脱性青光眼和原发性开角型青光眼的影响。
J Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar 23;2020:1723691. doi: 10.1155/2020/1723691. eCollection 2020.
7
One-year follow-up of the XEN® implant with mitomycin-C in pseudoexfoliative glaucoma patients.XEN®植入物联合丝裂霉素C治疗假性剥脱性青光眼患者的一年随访
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2019 May;29(3):309-314. doi: 10.1177/1120672118795063. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
8
Extreme intraocular pressure, mild glaucoma, and previous canaloplasty with indwelling suture: August consultation #1.极高眼压、轻度青光眼以及既往行带留置缝线的睫状体光凝术:8月第1次会诊
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Aug;44(8):1047. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.07.005.
9
Prospective Evaluation of XEN Gel Implant in Eyes With Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma.XEN 凝胶植入物在伴有假性剥脱性青光眼眼中的前瞻性评估。
J Glaucoma. 2018 Oct;27(10):869-873. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001045.
10
Recent Advances in the Surgical Management of Glaucoma in Exfoliation Syndrome.原发性开角型青光眼
J Glaucoma. 2018 Jul;27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S95-S101. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000918.