• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高压电刺激治疗外侧上髁炎患者的镇痛效果及功能效率——一项为期180天随访的报告

Analgesic and Functional Efficiency of High-Voltage Electrical Stimulation in Patients with Lateral Epicondylitis-A Report with a 180-Day Follow-Up.

作者信息

Dolibog Paweł T, Porębska Beata, Grzegorczyn Sławomir, Chmielewska Daria, Ślęzak Andrzej, Dolibog Patrycja

机构信息

Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 19 H. Jordan Str., 41-808 Zabrze, Silesia, Poland.

Department of Neurology with Stroke Subdepartment, Provincial Hospital in Bielsko-Biała, 101 Armii Krajowej Avenue, 43-316 Bielsko-Biała, Silesia, Poland.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 May 4;11(9):2571. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092571.

DOI:10.3390/jcm11092571
PMID:35566697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9105087/
Abstract

The available publications describing the beneficial effects of electrostimulation does not unequivocally confirm the clinical utility of high-voltage electrical stimulation (HVES) in the treatment of the lateral epicondylitis (LE). The aim of this study was the estimation of the effect of HVES on pain intensity and functional efficiency, both in the short and long term in patients with LE. The trial was registered by the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621001389897). There were 58 patients allocated into two groups: the HVES group (n = 29, mean age 49.9 ± 11.0 years), treated with HVES (pulse duration: 200μs, frequency: 100 Hz, current amplitude in the range of 18-25 mA, voltage amplitude: 100 V), and the NORM group ( = 29, mean age 48.0 ± 12.6 years), who were healthy and untreated patients. The treatments were performed 5 days a week (from Monday to Friday) for two weeks. Treatment progress was measured by the visual analogue scale (VAS) for rest pain, night pain, and pain during activity; the Laitinen Pain Scale (LPS); and hand grip strength (HGS) before and after the treatment, as well as after 3, 6, 12, and 24 weeks. The reduction of pain (according to the VAS and LPS) and increase in the functional condition (according to the HGS) were observed in all HVES patients in the short- and long-term observation. Therefore, the HVES in treatment of LE was found to be effective and safe.

摘要

现有描述电刺激有益效果的出版物并未明确证实高压电刺激(HVES)在治疗外侧上髁炎(LE)中的临床效用。本研究的目的是评估HVES对LE患者短期和长期疼痛强度及功能效率的影响。该试验已在澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12621001389897)注册。58名患者被分为两组:HVES组(n = 29,平均年龄49.9 ± 11.0岁),接受HVES治疗(脉冲持续时间:200μs,频率:100 Hz,电流幅度在18 - 25 mA范围内,电压幅度:100 V),以及NORM组(n = 29,平均年龄48.0 ± 12.6岁),该组为健康未治疗患者。治疗每周进行5天(从周一至周五),持续两周。通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量静息痛、夜间痛和活动时疼痛的治疗进展;Laitinen疼痛量表(LPS);以及治疗前后、3周、6周、12周和24周后的握力(HGS)。在短期和长期观察中,所有HVES患者均观察到疼痛减轻(根据VAS和LPS)以及功能状况改善(根据HGS)。因此,发现HVES治疗LE有效且安全。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f55/9105087/693e45216b05/jcm-11-02571-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f55/9105087/9ab87a4fe6e6/jcm-11-02571-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f55/9105087/2e5ac65c52e0/jcm-11-02571-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f55/9105087/66785d3c8104/jcm-11-02571-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f55/9105087/693e45216b05/jcm-11-02571-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f55/9105087/9ab87a4fe6e6/jcm-11-02571-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f55/9105087/2e5ac65c52e0/jcm-11-02571-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f55/9105087/66785d3c8104/jcm-11-02571-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f55/9105087/693e45216b05/jcm-11-02571-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Analgesic and Functional Efficiency of High-Voltage Electrical Stimulation in Patients with Lateral Epicondylitis-A Report with a 180-Day Follow-Up.高压电刺激治疗外侧上髁炎患者的镇痛效果及功能效率——一项为期180天随访的报告
J Clin Med. 2022 May 4;11(9):2571. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092571.
2
Muscle energy technique versus corticosteroid injection for management of chronic lateral epicondylitis: randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up.肌内效贴布贴扎联合运动疗法对比皮质类固醇注射治疗慢性肱骨外上髁炎:一项 1 年随访的随机对照研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Nov;94(11):2068-74. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.05.022. Epub 2013 Jun 22.
3
Kinesio taping in patients with lateral epicondylitis.肌内效贴布用于外侧上髁炎患者
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2016 Nov 21;29(4):853-858. doi: 10.3233/BMR-160701.
4
The effects of Mulligan's mobilization with movement technique in patients with lateral epicondylitis.穆利根动态松动术对肱骨外上髁炎患者的影响。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2020;33(1):99-107. doi: 10.3233/BMR-181135.
5
Proprioceptive elbow training reduces pain and improves function in painful lateral epicondylitis-a prospective trial.本体感肘部训练可减轻疼痛并改善外侧肱骨上髁炎的功能——一项前瞻性试验。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jul 27;16(1):468. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02602-3.
6
Does Kinesiotaping improve pain and functionality in patients with newly diagnosed lateral epicondylitis?肌内效贴布疗法是否能改善新诊断的外侧肱骨上髁炎患者的疼痛和功能?
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Mar;26(3):938-945. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4691-7. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
7
The Effectiveness of Kinesiotaping, Sham Taping or Exercises Only in Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Study.肌内效贴布、假性贴布或仅运动治疗肱骨外上髁炎的疗效:一项随机对照研究。
PM R. 2019 Jul;11(7):681-693. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12067. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
8
Comparison of the efficacy of kinesiotaping and extracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with newly diagnosed lateral epicondylitis: A prospective randomized trial.肌内效贴布与体外冲击波疗法治疗新诊断外侧上髁炎患者的疗效比较:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 May;23(5):704-710. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_45_19.
9
The effects of kinesiotaping on wrist extensor strength using an isokinetic device in patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis: A randomized-controlled trial.使用等速装置评估肌内效贴对慢性外侧上髁炎患者腕伸肌力量的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Mar 3;66(1):60-66. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2020.3298. eCollection 2020 Mar.
10
Evidence for the Durability of Autologous Tenocyte Injection for Treatment of Chronic Resistant Lateral Epicondylitis: Mean 4.5-Year Clinical Follow-up.自体肌腱细胞注射治疗慢性顽固性外侧上髁炎的疗效持久性证据:平均4.5年临床随访
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1775-83. doi: 10.1177/0363546515579185. Epub 2015 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and nutraceutical supplementation in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a randomized controlled trial.体外冲击波疗法和营养补充剂治疗肱骨外上髁炎的疗效:一项随机对照试验
Front Rehabil Sci. 2025 Jun 11;6:1593909. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2025.1593909. eCollection 2025.
2
Effect of Passive Warm-Up Using High-Voltage Pulsed-Current Electrical Stimulation on Jump Performance in Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.高压脉冲电流电刺激被动热身对年轻人跳跃性能的影响:一项随机对照试验
Cureus. 2025 Apr 2;17(4):e81594. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81594. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Immediate analgesic effect of two modes of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.两种经皮电神经刺激模式对慢性腰痛患者即时镇痛效果的随机对照试验。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2021 Dec 17;19:eAO6027. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2021AO6027. eCollection 2021.
2
Wound Healing with Electrical Stimulation Technologies: A Review.电刺激技术促进伤口愈合:综述
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Nov 1;13(21):3790. doi: 10.3390/polym13213790.
3
Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Interferential Current on Tactile Acuity of Individuals With Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain.
An Open-Label Comparative Study of the Impact of Two Types of Electrical Stimulation (Direct Current Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation) on Physical Therapy Treatment of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy.
两种电刺激(直流电神经肌肉电刺激和经皮电刺激)对糖尿病周围神经病变物理治疗影响的开放标签对照研究
J Diabetes Res. 2025 Feb 4;2025:9970124. doi: 10.1155/jdr/9970124. eCollection 2025.
经皮神经电刺激和干扰电流对非特异性慢性下腰痛患者触觉敏锐度的疗效。
Neuromodulation. 2022 Dec;25(8):1403-1409. doi: 10.1111/ner.13522. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
4
Comparing the efficacy of continuous and pulsed ultrasound therapies in patients with lateral epicondylitis: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.比较连续超声疗法与脉冲超声疗法治疗外侧上髁炎患者的疗效:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究。
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Mar 4;67(1):99-106. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2021.4789. eCollection 2021 Mar.
5
Comparison of low level laser therapy and extracorporeal shock wave in treatment of chronic lateral epicondylitis.低强度激光疗法与体外冲击波治疗慢性外侧上髁炎的比较。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2020 Nov;54(6):591-595. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2020.19102.
6
Comparison of the clinical and sonographic effects of ultrasound therapy, extracorporeal shock wave therapy, and Kinesio taping in lateral epicondylitis.超声疗法、体外冲击波疗法和肌内效贴布贴扎对比治疗肱骨外上髁炎的临床和超声效果。
Turk J Med Sci. 2021 Feb 26;51(1):76-83. doi: 10.3906/sag-2001-79.
7
Percutaneous Electrolysis in the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylalgia: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.经皮电解治疗肱骨外上髁炎:一项单盲随机对照试验
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 1;9(7):2068. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072068.
8
Comparison of the efficacy of kinesiotaping and extracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with newly diagnosed lateral epicondylitis: A prospective randomized trial.肌内效贴布与体外冲击波疗法治疗新诊断外侧上髁炎患者的疗效比较:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 May;23(5):704-710. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_45_19.
9
Focused and Radial Shock Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Tennis Elbow: A Pilot Randomised Controlled Study.聚焦和放射状冲击波疗法治疗网球肘:一项初步随机对照研究。
J Hum Kinet. 2015 Oct 14;47:127-35. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2015-0068. eCollection 2015 Sep 29.
10
Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in acute and chronic lateral epicondylitis.急性与慢性外侧上髁炎的体外冲击波疗法比较
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2015;49(5):465-70. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2015.14.0215.