• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性与慢性外侧上髁炎的体外冲击波疗法比较

Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in acute and chronic lateral epicondylitis.

作者信息

Köksal İsmet, Güler Olcay, Mahiroğulları Mahir, Mutlu Serhat, Çakmak Selami, Akşahin Ertuğrul

机构信息

Yenimahalle State Hospital, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ankara, Turkey.

Medipol University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2015;49(5):465-70. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2015.14.0215.

DOI:10.3944/AOTT.2015.14.0215
PMID:26422339
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the results of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in the treatment of acute (<3 months) lateral epicondylitis (LE) and chronic (>6 months) LE groups.

METHODS

Fifty-four patients who were diagnosed with LE and treated with BTL-5000 SWT Power (BTL Türkiye Medikal Cihazlar, Ankara, Turkey) ESWT were included in the study. Twenty-four patients who had symptoms for <3 months were defined as the acute LE group (Group A), and 30 patients who had symptoms for >6 months were defined as the chronic LE group (Group B). All cases were evaluated pretherapy and at Weeks 2, 12, and 24 posttherapy according to pain while resting, pain while stretching, pain when pressed, pain while lifting chair, pain while working, nighttime pain on LE zone.

RESULTS

Almost all values in both Group A and Group B were significantly improved at Weeks 2, 12, and 24 compared to the baseline values.

CONCLUSION

ESWT is equally effective in the treatment of acute LE and chronic LE. In addition, the current data suggest the progression of LE cases from acute phase to chronic phase may be prevented by treatment with ESWT.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估和比较体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)治疗急性(<3个月)外侧上髁炎(LE)和慢性(>6个月)LE组的结果。

方法

54例被诊断为LE并接受BTL-5000 SWT Power(BTL土耳其医疗设备公司,安卡拉,土耳其)ESWT治疗的患者纳入本研究。24例症状持续<3个月的患者被定义为急性LE组(A组),30例症状持续>6个月的患者被定义为慢性LE组(B组)。所有病例在治疗前以及治疗后第2周、12周和24周根据静息时疼痛、伸展时疼痛、按压时疼痛、举椅子时疼痛、工作时疼痛、LE区域夜间疼痛进行评估。

结果

与基线值相比,A组和B组在第2周、12周和24周时几乎所有数值均有显著改善。

结论

ESWT在治疗急性LE和慢性LE方面同样有效。此外,目前的数据表明,通过ESWT治疗可预防LE病例从急性期进展至慢性期。

相似文献

1
Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in acute and chronic lateral epicondylitis.急性与慢性外侧上髁炎的体外冲击波疗法比较
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2015;49(5):465-70. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2015.14.0215.
2
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for lateral epicondylitis--a double blind randomised controlled trial.体外冲击波治疗外侧上髁炎——一项双盲随机对照试验
J Orthop Res. 2002 Sep;20(5):895-8. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00013-X.
3
Photobiomodulation Therapy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis.光生物调节疗法与体外冲击波疗法治疗外侧上髁炎的对比研究
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2019 May;37(5):269-275. doi: 10.1089/photob.2018.4533.
4
Long-term effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the treatment of previously untreated lateral epicondylitis.体外冲击波疗法治疗既往未治疗的外侧上髁炎的长期疗效
Clin J Sport Med. 2005 Sep;15(5):305-12. doi: 10.1097/01.jsm.0000179137.69598.7e.
5
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy without local anesthesia for chronic lateral epicondylitis.不进行局部麻醉的体外冲击波疗法治疗慢性外侧上髁炎
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Jun;87(6):1297-304. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.C.01356.
6
Comparison of the efficiency of peloidotherapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapies in patients diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.泥疗与体外冲击波疗法治疗外侧肱骨上髁炎患者的疗效比较:一项前瞻性、随机、对照研究。
Int J Biometeorol. 2024 Jan;68(1):101-108. doi: 10.1007/s00484-023-02574-5. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
7
Safety and efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for chronic lateral epicondylitis.体外冲击波疗法治疗慢性外侧上髁炎的安全性和有效性。
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2005 Jan;34(1):13-9; discussion 19.
8
Physical therapy, corticosteroid injection, and extracorporeal shock wave treatment in lateral epicondylitis. Clinical and ultrasonographical comparison.物理疗法、皮质类固醇注射和体外冲击波治疗外侧肱骨上髁炎。临床和超声比较。
Clin Rheumatol. 2012 May;31(5):807-12. doi: 10.1007/s10067-012-1939-y. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
9
Short- to mid-term follow-up effectiveness of US-guided focal extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of elbow lateral epicondylitis.超声引导下聚焦体外冲击波疗法治疗肘部外侧上髁炎的短期至中期随访疗效
Musculoskelet Surg. 2015 Sep;99 Suppl 1:S91-7. doi: 10.1007/s12306-015-0361-4. Epub 2015 May 10.
10
A randomized controlled trial of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow).体外冲击波治疗外侧上髁炎(网球肘)的随机对照试验
J Rheumatol. 2008 Oct;35(10):2038-46. Epub 2008 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing extracorporeal shockwave therapy and physiotherapy in the treatment of acute plantar fasciitis.一项比较体外冲击波疗法与物理疗法治疗急性足底筋膜炎的前瞻性随机对照试验。
J Orthop. 2025 Mar 15;70:25-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2025.03.015. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
Effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy versus ultrasonic therapy and deep friction massage in the management of lateral epicondylitis: a randomized clinical trial.体外冲击波疗法与超声波疗法及深部摩擦按摩治疗肱骨外上髁炎的效果:一项随机临床试验
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 17;14(1):16535. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67313-1.
3
Analgesic and Functional Efficiency of High-Voltage Electrical Stimulation in Patients with Lateral Epicondylitis-A Report with a 180-Day Follow-Up.
高压电刺激治疗外侧上髁炎患者的镇痛效果及功能效率——一项为期180天随访的报告
J Clin Med. 2022 May 4;11(9):2571. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092571.
4
Comparison of the effectiveness of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy and supervised exercises with neuromuscular inhibition technique in lateral epicondylitis: A randomized-controlled trial.桡侧体外冲击波疗法与采用神经肌肉抑制技术的监督性运动治疗外侧上髁炎的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Dec 1;67(4):439-448. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2021.5871. eCollection 2021 Dec.
5
A comparative study of the efficacy of radial and focused shock wave therapy for tennis elbow depending on symptom duration.一项根据症状持续时间对比桡侧和聚焦冲击波疗法治疗网球肘疗效的研究。
Arch Med Sci. 2020 Apr 6;17(6):1686-1695. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2019.81361. eCollection 2021.
6
Does the Type of Extracorporeal Shock Therapy Influence Treatment Effectiveness in Lateral Epicondylitis? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.体外冲击波治疗肱骨外上髁炎的疗效是否因治疗类型而异?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Oct;478(10):2324-2339. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001246.
7
Functional Outcome at Short and Middle Term of the Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Treatment in Lateral Epicondylitis: A Case-Series Study.体外冲击波疗法治疗肱骨外上髁炎的短期和中期功能结果:一项病例系列研究
J Clin Med. 2020 Feb 27;9(3):633. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030633.
8
Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Treatment in Upper Limb Diseases: A Systematic Review.体外冲击波疗法治疗上肢疾病:一项系统综述
J Clin Med. 2020 Feb 6;9(2):453. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020453.
9
Comparison of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy with ultrasound therapy in patients with lateral epicondylitis.桡侧体外冲击波疗法与超声疗法治疗外侧上髁炎患者的比较。
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2020 Apr;47(2):319-325. doi: 10.1007/s10396-019-01002-9. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
10
Analgesic Effect of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment Combined with Fascial Manipulation Theory for Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder: A Retrospective Study.体外冲击波治疗联合筋膜手法治疗肩周炎的镇痛效果:一项回顾性研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jan 18;2018:3450940. doi: 10.1155/2018/3450940. eCollection 2018.