• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑卒中患者 PROMIS 项目库的测量性能和可解释性:系统评价。

Measurement properties and interpretability of the PROMIS item banks in stroke patients: a systematic review.

机构信息

Basalt Rehabilitation, Wassenaarseweg 501, 2333 AL, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Department of Rehabilitation, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2022 Dec;31(12):3305-3315. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03149-4. Epub 2022 May 14.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-022-03149-4
PMID:35567674
Abstract

PURPOSE

Both the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement and the National Institutes of Health recommend the use of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) measures in clinical care and research for stroke patients. This study aimed to systematically review the literature on the measurement properties and interpretability of PROMIS measures in stroke patients.

METHODS

Nine databases were searched from January 1st, 2007 till April 12th, 2021 for studies concerning the measurement properties and interpretability of PROMIS measures in stroke patients. The findings of these studies were analyzed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs).

RESULTS

Ten studies were included. The PROMIS Global Health was studied the most: its two subscales had sufficient structural validity in one study of very good quality, sufficient construct validity with > 75% of hypotheses tested confirmed (high GRADE rating), sufficient internal consistency, i.e. α ≥ 0.70 in two studies (high GRADE rating), sufficient reliability, i.e. ICC ≥ 0.70 in one study of doubtful quality, and indeterminate responsiveness in one study of inadequate quality. For other PROMIS measures, the measurement properties and interpretability were limitedly studied.

CONCLUSION

The PROMIS Global Health showed sufficient structural and construct validity and internal consistency in stroke patients. There is a need for further research on content validity, structural validity, and measurement invariance of PROMIS measures in stroke patients. Trial Registration Information: CRD42020203044 (PROSPERO).

摘要

目的

国际健康结果测量联合会和美国国立卫生研究院均建议在脑卒中患者的临床护理和研究中使用患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS®)量表。本研究旨在系统地回顾关于脑卒中患者 PROMIS 量表测量特性和可解释性的文献。

方法

从 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 4 月 12 日,我们在 9 个数据库中搜索了有关脑卒中患者 PROMIS 量表测量特性和可解释性的研究。根据患者报告结局测量(PROMs)系统评价的共识基础标准选择健康测量仪器(COSMIN)指南,分析这些研究的结果。

结果

纳入了 10 项研究。PROMIS 全球健康量表研究最多:一项研究质量非常好,其两个分量表具有充分的结构有效性,超过 75%的假设得到证实(高 GRADE 评分),具有充分的构建有效性;两项研究的内部一致性较高,α≥0.70(高 GRADE 评分);一项研究的可靠性较高,ICC≥0.70(可疑质量);一项研究的反应度不确定(质量不足)。对于其他 PROMIS 量表,其测量特性和可解释性研究有限。

结论

PROMIS 全球健康量表在脑卒中患者中表现出充分的结构和构建有效性以及内部一致性。需要进一步研究 PROMIS 量表在脑卒中患者中的内容有效性、结构有效性和测量不变性。

试验注册信息

CRD42020203044(PROSPERO)。

相似文献

1
Measurement properties and interpretability of the PROMIS item banks in stroke patients: a systematic review.脑卒中患者 PROMIS 项目库的测量性能和可解释性:系统评价。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Dec;31(12):3305-3315. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03149-4. Epub 2022 May 14.
2
Measurement properties of the Dutch-Flemish patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) physical function item bank and instruments: a systematic review.荷兰-佛兰德斯患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)物理功能项目库和工具的测量特性:系统评价。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Feb 24;19(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01647-y.
3
The patient-reported outcomes measurement information systems (PROMIS®) physical function and its derivative measures in adults: a systematic review of content validity.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS®)成人版生理功能及其衍生指标的内容效度系统评价。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Dec;31(12):3317-3330. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03151-w. Epub 2022 May 27.
4
A systematic review of tools designed for teacher proxy-report of children's physical literacy or constituting elements.系统评价教师代理报告儿童身体素养或构成要素的工具。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Oct 8;18(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01162-3.
5
Evaluating measures of quality of life in adult scoliosis: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.评价成人脊柱侧弯生活质量的评估方法:系统评价和叙述性综合。
Spine Deform. 2022 Sep;10(5):991-1002. doi: 10.1007/s43390-022-00498-5. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
6
Tools for Evaluating the Content, Efficacy, and Usability of Mobile Health Apps According to the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments: Systematic Review.根据基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准评估移动健康应用程序的内容、疗效和可用性的工具:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Dec 1;9(12):e15433. doi: 10.2196/15433.
7
The measurement properties of assessment tools for chronic wounds: A systematic review.评估慢性伤口的工具的测量特性:系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Sep;121:103998. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103998. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
8
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function instruments compare favorably to legacy patient-reported outcome measures in spine patients: a systematic review of the literature.患者报告的结局测量信息系统身体功能工具与脊柱疾病患者传统的患者报告结局测量方法相比具有优势:一项文献系统评价
Spine J. 2022 Apr;22(4):646-659. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.10.009. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
9
Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in hyperhidrosis: a systematic review.多汗症患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)的测量特性:系统评价。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Mar;31(3):671-686. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02958-3. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
10
The Withdrawal Assessment Tool to identify iatrogenic withdrawal symptoms in critically ill paediatric patients: A COSMIN systematic review of measurement properties.《识别危重症儿科患者医源性戒断症状的戒断评估工具:一项针对测量特性的 COSMIN 系统评价》。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2021 Aug;27(4):976-988. doi: 10.1111/jep.13539. Epub 2021 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Task Practice With and Without Aerobic Exercise Improves Health-related Quality of Life and Social Participation Post-stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.有或没有有氧运动的任务练习可改善中风后与健康相关的生活质量和社会参与度:一项随机临床试验。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2025 Aug;39(8):591-601. doi: 10.1177/15459683251338784. Epub 2025 May 22.
2
Days Alive and Out of Hospital: Reframing Stroke Outcomes for Better Patient-Centered Care.存活天数与出院情况:重新构建中风结局以实现更好的以患者为中心的护理。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jul 16;13(14):e035849. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035849. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
3
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the ICHOM standard set for stroke: the Dutch version.

本文引用的文献

1
Generic PROMIS item banks in adults with hemophilia for patient-reported outcome assessment: Feasibility, measurement properties, and relevance.用于血友病成人患者报告结局评估的通用PROMIS条目库:可行性、测量特性及相关性
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2021 Nov 21;5(8):e12621. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12621. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Psychometric properties of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system scale v1.2: global health (PROMIS-GH) in a Dutch general population.患者报告结局测量信息系统量表 v1.2 的心理测量特性:荷兰一般人群中的全球健康状况(PROMIS-GH)。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Sep 27;19(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01855-0.
3
ICHOM 卒中标准集的翻译和跨文化调适:荷兰语版。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Sep 11;7(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00630-7.
4
Psychometric properties and general population reference values for PROMIS Global Health in Hungary.匈牙利 PROMIS 全球健康量表的心理测量学特性和一般人群参考值。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Jun;25(4):549-562. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01610-w. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
5
Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Measures in Clinical Research in Patients With Stroke: A Systematic Literature Review.患者报告结局测量信息系统测量方法在中风患者临床研究中的应用:一项系统文献综述
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2022 Mar 25;4(2):100191. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100191. eCollection 2022 Jun.
Self-reported quality of life following stroke: a systematic review of instruments with a focus on their psychometric properties.
脑卒中后自我报告的生活质量:关注其心理测量特性的工具的系统评价。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Feb;31(2):329-342. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02944-9. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
4
Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures.最小重要变化(MIC):对患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)指标的MIC估计值进行概念澄清和系统综述
Qual Life Res. 2021 Oct;30(10):2729-2754. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02925-y. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
5
Exploratory factor analysis of PROMIS-29 V1.0, PROMIS Global Health and the RAND SF-36 from chiropractic responders attending care in a practice-based research network.基于实践网络的脊椎按摩响应者接受治疗时,对 PROMIS-29 V1.0、PROMIS 全球健康和 RAND SF-36 进行探索性因素分析。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Mar 10;19(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01725-9.
6
Measurement properties of the Dutch-Flemish patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) physical function item bank and instruments: a systematic review.荷兰-佛兰德斯患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)物理功能项目库和工具的测量特性:系统评价。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Feb 24;19(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01647-y.
7
Responsiveness of PROMIS and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) Depression Scales in three clinical trials.在三项临床试验中,PROMIS 和患者健康问卷(PHQ)抑郁量表的反应性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Feb 4;19(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01674-3.
8
Minimally important differences and severity thresholds are estimated for the PROMIS depression scales from three randomized clinical trials.从三项随机临床试验中估计了 PROMIS 抑郁量表的最小有意义差异和严重程度阈值。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Apr 1;266:100-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.101. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
9
Clinical Utility of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Domain Scales.患者报告结局测量信息系统领域量表的临床效用
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Jan;12(1):e004753. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004753.
10
Comparative Responsiveness of the PROMIS Pain Interference Short Forms With Legacy Pain Measures: Results From Three Randomized Clinical Trials.PROMIS 疼痛干扰简短量表与传统疼痛测量方法的比较反应性:三项随机临床试验结果。
J Pain. 2019 Jun;20(6):664-675. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.11.010. Epub 2018 Dec 6.