• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主要非心脏手术后的饮水、进食和活动(DrEaMing)的实施及其与住院时间的关系:观察性队列研究。

Delivery of drinking, eating and mobilising (DrEaMing) and its association with length of hospital stay after major noncardiac surgery: observational cohort study.

机构信息

Centre for Perioperative Medicine, Research Department for Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.

Centre for Perioperative Medicine, Research Department for Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University College London Hospitals, London, UK; Health Services Research Centre, National Institute for Academic Anaesthesia, Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2022 Jul;129(1):114-126. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.021. Epub 2022 May 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.021
PMID:35568508
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9284668/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery pathways are associated with improved postoperative outcomes. However, as enhanced recovery pathways have become more complex and varied, compliance has reduced. The 'DrEaMing' bundle re-prioritises early postoperative delivery of drinking, eating, and mobilising. We investigated relationships between DrEaMing compliance, postoperative hospital length of stay (LOS), and complications in a prospective multicentre major surgical cohort.

METHODS

We interrogated the UK Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme dataset. Analyses were conducted in four stages. In an exploratory cohort, we identified independent predictors of DrEaMing. We quantified the association between delivery of DrEaMing (and its component variables) and prolonged LOS in a homogenous colorectal subgroup and assessed generalisability in multispecialty patients. Finally, LOS and complications were compared across hospitals, stratified by DrEaMing compliance.

RESULTS

The exploratory cohort comprised 22 218 records, the colorectal subgroup 7230, and the multispecialty subgroup 5713. DrEaMing compliance was 59% (13 112 patients), 60% (4341 patients), and 60% (3421), respectively, but varied substantially between hospitals. Delivery of DrEaMing predicted reduced odds of prolonged LOS in colorectal (odds ratio 0.51 [0.43-0.59], P<0.001) and multispecialty cohorts (odds ratio 0.47 [0.41-0.53], P<0.001). At the hospital level, complications were not the primary determinant of LOS after colorectal surgery, but consistent delivery of DrEaMing was associated with significantly shorter LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

Delivery of bundled and unbundled DrEaMing was associated with substantial reductions in postoperative LOS, independent of the effects of confounder variables. Consistency of process delivery, and not complications, predicted shorter hospital-level length of stay. DrEaMing may be adopted by perioperative health systems as a quality metric to support improved patient outcomes and reduced hospital length of stay.

摘要

背景

强化康复路径与改善术后结果相关。然而,随着强化康复路径变得更加复杂和多样化,其依从性降低。“DrEaMing”方案重新优先考虑术后早期饮水、进食和活动。我们在一个前瞻性多中心大手术队列中研究了 DrEaMing 依从性、术后住院时间(LOS)和并发症之间的关系。

方法

我们查询了英国围手术期质量改进计划数据集。分析分四个阶段进行。在探索性队列中,我们确定了 DrEaMing 的独立预测因素。我们量化了在同质结直肠亚组中提供 DrEaMing(及其组成变量)与延长 LOS 之间的关联,并评估了多专业患者的普遍性。最后,根据 DrEaMing 依从性对医院进行分层,比较 LOS 和并发症。

结果

探索性队列包括 22218 份记录、7230 份结直肠亚组和 5713 份多专业亚组。DrEaMing 的依从性分别为 59%(13112 例)、60%(4341 例)和 60%(3421 例),但医院之间差异很大。在结直肠(比值比 0.51 [0.43-0.59],P<0.001)和多专业队列(比值比 0.47 [0.41-0.53],P<0.001)中,提供 DrEaMing 预测了 LOS 延长的可能性降低。在医院层面,结直肠手术后 LOS 的主要决定因素不是并发症,而是 DrEaMing 的一致提供与 LOS 显著缩短相关。

结论

捆绑和非捆绑 DrEaMing 的提供与术后 LOS 的显著减少相关,独立于混杂变量的影响。流程提供的一致性,而不是并发症,预测了医院层面的住院时间缩短。DrEaMing 可被围手术期卫生系统采用作为质量指标,以支持改善患者结局和缩短住院时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/465e/9284668/5288df756939/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/465e/9284668/5288df756939/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/465e/9284668/5288df756939/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Delivery of drinking, eating and mobilising (DrEaMing) and its association with length of hospital stay after major noncardiac surgery: observational cohort study.主要非心脏手术后的饮水、进食和活动(DrEaMing)的实施及其与住院时间的关系:观察性队列研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Jul;129(1):114-126. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.021. Epub 2022 May 12.
2
Protein intakes are associated with reduced length of stay: a comparison between Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) and conventional care after elective colorectal surgery.蛋白质摄入量与住院时间缩短相关:择期结直肠手术后加速康复外科(ERAS)与传统护理的比较。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Jul;106(1):44-51. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.148619. Epub 2017 May 3.
3
Is ERAS in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer changing risk factors for delayed recovery?结直肠癌腹腔镜手术中的加速康复外科(ERAS)是否正在改变延迟恢复的风险因素?
Med Oncol. 2016 Mar;33(3):25. doi: 10.1007/s12032-016-0738-8. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
4
Enhanced recovery after surgery in colorectal surgery: Impact of protocol adherence on patient outcomes.结直肠外科手术中的术后加速康复:方案依从性对患者结局的影响。
J Clin Anesth. 2019 Aug;55:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.12.034. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
5
Greater intravenous fluid volumes are associated with prolonged recovery after colorectal surgery: a retrospective cohort study.静脉补液量越大,结直肠手术后恢复时间越长:一项回顾性队列研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jun;116(6):804-10. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew125.
6
The association between preoperative fatigue and instrumental activities in daily living with complications and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.术前疲劳与接受结直肠手术患者的日常生活活动工具性能力、并发症及住院时间的相关性。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Feb;32(2):257-264. doi: 10.1007/s40520-019-01199-2. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
7
Enhanced Recovery Program in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: An Observational Controlled Trial.腹腔镜结直肠手术中的加速康复方案:一项观察性对照试验。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Apr;31(4):363-370. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0716. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
8
The Association Between Modifiable Lifestyle Factors and Postoperative Complications of Elective Surgery in Patients With Colorectal Cancer.可改变的生活方式因素与择期结直肠癌手术患者术后并发症的关系。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Nov 1;64(11):1342-1353. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001976.
9
Colorectal surgical outcomes following implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery programme in Cape Town.开普敦实施术后加速康复方案后结直肠手术的结果。
S Afr J Surg. 2021 Dec;59(4):157-163.
10
Outcomes of a Colorectal Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol Modified for a Diverse and Urban Community.针对多元化城市社区改良的结直肠手术后加速康复方案的效果
J Surg Res. 2023 Jun;286:74-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.12.044. Epub 2023 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
PROMOTE: A patient-centred poster to support engagement in post-operative recovery - A quality improvement initiative.推广:一张以患者为中心的海报,以支持术后康复参与——一项质量改进举措。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2025 Sep 10:17511437251372019. doi: 10.1177/17511437251372019.
2
The 7 Pillars of Pain Management for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery.微创心脏手术疼痛管理的七大支柱
Innovations (Phila). 2025 Jul-Aug;20(4):331-335. doi: 10.1177/15569845251358225. Epub 2025 Jul 27.
3
Perioperative Quality Initiative consensus statement recommendations on the definition, development, implementation and outcomes of pre-operative surgery schools.

本文引用的文献

1
The Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP patient study): protocol for a UK multicentre, prospective cohort study to measure quality of care and outcomes after major surgery.围手术期质量改进计划(PQIP患者研究):一项英国多中心前瞻性队列研究的方案,旨在评估大手术后的护理质量和结果。
Perioper Med (Lond). 2022 Aug 9;11(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13741-022-00262-3.
2
Barriers and facilitators to the successful development, implementation and evaluation of care bundles in acute care in hospital: a scoping review.在医院急性护理中成功开发、实施和评估护理捆绑包的障碍和促进因素:范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2019 May 6;14(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0894-2.
3
围手术期质量倡议关于术前手术培训学校的定义、发展、实施及结果的共识声明建议
Anaesthesia. 2025 Sep;80(9):1115-1133. doi: 10.1111/anae.16648. Epub 2025 Jun 21.
4
Hospital length of stay, 30-day emergency readmissions and the role of the DrEaMing enhanced recovery pathways in colonic and rectal surgery in England.住院时间、30天内紧急再入院情况以及英格兰结肠直肠手术中DrEaMing强化康复路径的作用。
Br J Anaesth. 2025 Jun;134(6):1765-1772. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.02.034. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
5
Unlocking opportunities to transform patient care: an expert insight on limitations and opportunities in patient monitoring.开启改变患者护理的机遇:关于患者监测局限性与机遇的专家见解
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2025 Feb 22;13(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40635-025-00733-z.
6
Transforming in-clinic post-operative and intermediate care with cosinuss°.借助cosinuss°变革临床术后及中期护理。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024 Oct 5;24:630-638. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.10.002. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Challenges and opportunities in enhanced recovery after surgery programs: An overview.手术后加速康复计划中的挑战与机遇:综述
Indian J Anaesth. 2024 Nov;68(11):951-958. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_546_24. Epub 2024 Oct 26.
8
Estimated Carbon Savings from Changing Surgical Trends in Primary Elective Total Hip Arthroplasty in England: A Retrospective Observational Study.英格兰初次择期全髋关节置换术手术趋势变化带来的碳减排估算:一项回顾性观察研究
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Jan;23(1):85-92. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00916-x. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
9
Associations between ondansetron and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and food intake in Japanese female undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery: a retrospective study.昂丹司琼与日本女性腹腔镜妇科手术后恶心呕吐和食物摄入发生率的关系:一项回顾性研究。
J Anesth. 2024 Apr;38(2):185-190. doi: 10.1007/s00540-023-03295-0. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
10
Wearable in-ear pulse oximetry validly measures oxygen saturation between 70% and 100%: A prospective agreement study.可穿戴式入耳式脉搏血氧仪在70%至100%之间能有效测量血氧饱和度:一项前瞻性一致性研究。
Digit Health. 2023 Nov 7;9:20552076231211169. doi: 10.1177/20552076231211169. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
Effectiveness of a national quality improvement programme to improve survival after emergency abdominal surgery (EPOCH): a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial.
国家质量改进计划对提高急诊腹部手术后生存的效果(EPOCH):一项阶梯式楔形集群随机试验。
Lancet. 2019 Jun 1;393(10187):2213-2221. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32521-2. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
4
Evaluation of the Collaborative Use of an Evidence-Based Care Bundle in Emergency Laparotomy.评价基于循证的护理捆绑在急诊剖腹术中的联合应用。
JAMA Surg. 2019 May 1;154(5):e190145. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0145. Epub 2019 May 15.
5
Nurse-Led Mobility Program: Driving a Culture of Early Mobilization in Medical-Surgical Nursing.护士主导的活动计划:推动外科护理中早期活动的文化
J Nurs Care Qual. 2020 Jan/Mar;35(1):20-26. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000404.
6
Randomized clinical trial of selective decontamination of the digestive tract in elective colorectal cancer surgery (SELECT trial).选择性消化道去污染在择期结直肠手术中的随机临床试验(SELECT 试验)。
Br J Surg. 2019 Mar;106(4):355-363. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11117. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
7
The Role of Oral Antibiotic Preparation in Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Meta-analysis.口服抗生素准备在择期结直肠手术中的作用:一项荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2019 Jul;270(1):43-58. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003145.
8
Improving care at scale: process evaluation of a multi-component quality improvement intervention to reduce mortality after emergency abdominal surgery (EPOCH trial).规模化改善医疗服务:一项多环节质量改进干预措施以降低急诊腹部手术后死亡率的效果评价(EPOCH 试验)。
Implement Sci. 2018 Nov 13;13(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0823-9.
9
The role of mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics for left-sided laparoscopic and open elective restorative colorectal surgery with and without faecal diversion.机械性肠道准备和口服抗生素在有或无粪便转流的左侧腹腔镜和开放性择期结直肠修复手术中的作用。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Dec;33(12):1781-1791. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3166-8. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
10
Reference effect measures for quantifying, comparing and visualizing variation from random and fixed effects in non-normal multilevel models, with applications to site variation in medical procedure use and outcomes.参考效应度量,用于量化、比较和可视化非正态多水平模型中的随机和固定效应差异,应用于医疗程序使用和结果中的部位差异。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Jul 6;18(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0517-7.