Fleming M F, Bentz E J, McGaghie W C
Fam Med. 1986 Jul-Aug;18(4):201-4.
Family physicians frequently choose which elements of patient care to emphasize in order to balance the idealized principles of medical care with the real constraints of medical practice. Colleagues at several residency programs agreed to help us to find out if these choices can be quantified and whether personal characteristics of respondents or the acuteness or chronicity of the patient's illness influence these priorities. Two sets of 15 forced-choice item pairs, one set in reference to chronic illness and one set in reference to acute illness, were used in the study. Responses from 346 family physicians and non-physician colleagues ranked six hypothetical elements of patient care for acute and chronic illness: continuity, comprehensiveness, family orientation, community orientation, coordination and prevention. The data were analyzed using the psychometric scaling technique of paired comparisons. The analysis yielded a set of rankings which showed that these choices were quantifiable and made with a high degree of individual consistency and greater intragroup agreement than would result from chance. Patterns of choice differed for acute and chronic illness in a manner consistent with observed clinical practice.
家庭医生经常会选择在患者护理中强调哪些要素,以便在医疗护理的理想化原则与医疗实践的实际限制之间取得平衡。几个住院医师培训项目的同事同意帮助我们弄清楚这些选择是否可以量化,以及受访者的个人特征或患者疾病的急性或慢性是否会影响这些优先事项。该研究使用了两组15对强迫选择项目对,一组涉及慢性病,另一组涉及急性病。346名家庭医生和非医生同事的回答对急性病和慢性病患者护理的六个假设要素进行了排序:连续性、全面性、家庭导向、社区导向、协调性和预防性。使用配对比较的心理测量量表技术对数据进行了分析。分析得出了一组排名,表明这些选择是可以量化的,并且做出这些选择时具有高度的个体一致性,且组内一致性高于随机结果。急性病和慢性病的选择模式有所不同,这与观察到的临床实践一致。