• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1.5T 与 3.0T MRI 诊断胎盘植入谱系疾病的比较。

Comparison between 1.5-T and 3.0-T MRI for the diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum disorders.

机构信息

First Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Aretaieion Hospital, Athens 11528, Greece.

First Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Aretaieion Hospital, Athens 11528, Greece.

出版信息

Diagn Interv Imaging. 2022 Sep;103(9):408-417. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2022.04.005. Epub 2022 May 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.diii.2022.04.005
PMID:35568666
Abstract

PURPOSE

Accurate antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is important for optimal management. The purpose of this study was to compare the respective capabilities of 1.5-T and 3.0-T MRI in the diagnosis of PAS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between March 2016-March 2021, 190 pregnant women at high risk for PAS underwent dedicated prenatal MRI with either 1.5-T or 3.0-T units at a tertiary imaging center. Cesarian section and MRI were performed less than 6 weeks from each other. Prospectively collected data were evaluated by two experienced genitourinary radiologists for presence and extent of PAS. A comparative study was designed to investigate differences in predictive ability between 1.5-T and 3.0-T MRI groups. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, negative and positive prognostic values relative to intraoperative/histological findings, were computed for both groups and were compared with chi-square (χ 2) test. Interobserver agreement was estimated using Kappa test.

RESULTS

One hundred-eighty-two gravid women were included in the study; of these, 91/182 (50%) women were evaluated with 1.5-T (mean age, 35 ± 5.1 [SD] years; mean gestational age: 32.5 weeks) and 91/182 (50%) with 3.0-T MRI (mean age, 34.9 ± 4.9 [SD] years; mean gestational age, 32.1 weeks). 1.5-T MRI yielded 95.7% sensitivity (95% CI: 87.8-99.1) and 81.8% specificity (95% CI: 59.8) and 3.0-T MRI 93.8% sensitivity (95% CI: 86.0-97.9) and 83.3% specificity (95% CI: 48.2-97.7) for PAS identification, with no differences between the two groups (P = 0.725 and P >0.999, respectively). MRI showed excellent predictive ability for detecting extrauterine placental spread with 100% sensitivity (95% CI: 89.4-100.0), 96.7% specificity (95% CI: 88.1-99.6) for 1.5-T and 97% sensitivity (95% CI: 84.2-99.9), 96.7% specificity (95% CI: 88.1-99.6) for 3.0-T without differences between the two groups (P > 0.999). Interobserver agreement was excellent for both groups. The most frequently detected MRI signs of PAS for both 1.5-T and 3.0-T groups were placental heterogeneity (n = 85, 93.5% vs. n = 90, 98.9%; P = 0.413), and intraplacental fetal vessels (n = 64, 70.3% vs. n = 65, 71.4%; P = 0.870).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that 3.0-T MRI and 1.5-T MRI are equivalent for the diagnosis of PAS.

摘要

目的

准确的产前胎盘植入谱系(PAS)诊断对于优化管理很重要。本研究旨在比较 1.5-T 和 3.0-T MRI 在 PAS 诊断中的各自能力。

材料和方法

2016 年 3 月至 2021 年 3 月,在一家三级影像中心,190 名高危 PAS 的孕妇分别在 1.5-T 或 3.0-T 设备上进行了专门的产前 MRI。剖宫产术和 MRI 的时间间隔小于 6 周。前瞻性收集的数据由两位有经验的泌尿生殖放射科医生对 PAS 的存在和程度进行评估。设计了一项对比研究,以调查 1.5-T 和 3.0-T MRI 组之间预测能力的差异。计算了两组的敏感性、特异性、准确性、阴性和阳性预测值,相对于术中/组织学发现,并通过卡方(χ 2)检验进行比较。采用 Kappa 检验估计观察者间的一致性。

结果

182 名孕妇纳入研究;其中,91/182(50%)名孕妇接受 1.5-T(平均年龄 35 ± 5.1[SD]岁;平均妊娠周数:32.5 周)评估,91/182(50%)名孕妇接受 3.0-T MRI(平均年龄 34.9 ± 4.9[SD]岁;平均妊娠周数 32.1 周)。1.5-T MRI 对 PAS 识别的敏感性为 95.7%(95%CI:87.8-99.1),特异性为 81.8%(95%CI:59.8),3.0-T MRI 的敏感性为 93.8%(95%CI:86.0-97.9),特异性为 83.3%(95%CI:48.2-97.7),两组间无差异(P = 0.725 和 P >0.999)。MRI 对检测子宫外胎盘扩散具有出色的预测能力,1.5-T 和 3.0-T 的敏感性均为 100%(95%CI:89.4-100.0),特异性均为 96.7%(95%CI:88.1-99.6),差异无统计学意义(P >0.999)。观察者间的一致性在两组中均为极好。两组最常发现的 PAS MRI 征象是胎盘不均匀(n = 85,93.5% vs. n = 90,98.9%;P = 0.413)和胎盘内胎儿血管(n = 64,70.3% vs. n = 65,71.4%;P = 0.870)。

结论

本研究表明,3.0-T MRI 和 1.5-T MRI 对 PAS 的诊断具有等效性。

相似文献

1
Comparison between 1.5-T and 3.0-T MRI for the diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum disorders.1.5T 与 3.0T MRI 诊断胎盘植入谱系疾病的比较。
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2022 Sep;103(9):408-417. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2022.04.005. Epub 2022 May 12.
2
Intraplacental Fetal Vessel Diameter May Help Predict for Placental Invasiveness in Pregnant Women at High Risk for Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders.胎盘内胎儿血管直径可能有助于预测胎盘侵入性在胎盘植入谱系疾病高危孕妇中的作用。
Radiology. 2021 Feb;298(2):403-412. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200273. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
3
Interobserver agreement in MRI assessment of severity of placenta accreta spectrum disorders.磁共振成像评估胎盘植入谱系疾病严重程度的观察者间一致性
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;55(4):467-473. doi: 10.1002/uog.20381.
4
Role of Ultrasound and MRI in Diagnosis of Severe Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder: An Intraindividual Assessment With Emphasis on Placental Bulge.超声和 MRI 在严重胎盘植入谱系疾病诊断中的作用:强调胎盘膨出的个体内评估。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Dec;217(6):1377-1388. doi: 10.2214/AJR.21.25581. Epub 2021 May 26.
5
MRI prognosticators for adverse maternal and neonatal clinical outcome in patients at high risk for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders.MRI 预测指标在胎盘部位滋养细胞疾病谱(PAS)高危患者中对母婴不良临床结局的影响。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Aug;50(2):602-618. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26592. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
6
Development and validation of MRI-based scoring models for predicting placental invasiveness in high-risk women for placenta accreta spectrum.基于 MRI 的评分模型的开发和验证,用于预测胎盘植入疾病谱高危人群的胎盘侵袭性。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Feb;34(2):957-969. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10058-8. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
7
Prenatal planning of placenta previa: diagnostic accuracy of a novel MRI-based prediction model for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) and clinical outcome.胎盘前置的产前规划:一种新型 MRI 胎盘植入谱系疾病(PAS)预测模型的诊断准确性及其临床结局。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 May;44(5):1873-1882. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1882-8.
8
Intraplacental T2-hypointense bands may help predict placental invasion depth and postpartum hemorrhage in placenta accrete spectrum disorders in high-risk gravid patients.胎盘内 T2 低信号带有助于预测高危妊娠患者胎盘植入谱系疾病的胎盘侵犯深度和产后出血。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Dec;94:73-79. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2022.09.005. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
9
Diagnostic performance of radiologists with different levels of experience in the interpretation of MRI of the placenta accreta spectrum disorder.不同经验水平的放射科医生在解读胎盘植入谱系疾病 MRI 中的诊断性能。
Br J Radiol. 2021 Dec;94(1128):20210827. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210827. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
10
Accuracy and Interobserver Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders.磁共振成像诊断胎盘植入谱系疾病的准确性和观察者间可靠性。
Am J Perinatol. 2021 Jul;38(9):960-967. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701196. Epub 2020 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in Prenatal Diagnosis of Placenta Accreta Spectrum.胎盘植入谱系疾病的产前诊断进展
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Feb 24;61(3):392. doi: 10.3390/medicina61030392.
2
MRI Assessed Placental Location as a Diagnostic Tool of Placental Invasiveness and Maternal Peripartum Morbidity.磁共振成像评估胎盘位置作为胎盘植入和产妇围产期发病率的诊断工具。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Apr 29;14(9):925. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14090925.
3
Fetal MRI: what's new? A short review.胎儿磁共振成像:有哪些新进展?一篇简短的综述。
Eur Radiol Exp. 2023 Aug 10;7(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s41747-023-00358-5.