• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

按共付比率划分的义齿使用的收入不平等差异:一项 JAGES 横断面研究。

Difference of income inequalities of denture use by co-payment rates: A JAGES cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Department of International and Community Oral Health, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai, Japan.

Department of Oral Health Promotion, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Japan.

出版信息

Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2023 Jun;51(3):557-564. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12749. Epub 2022 May 15.

DOI:10.1111/cdoe.12749
PMID:35569009
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Studies suggest that wearing dentures to restore missing teeth can have a positive impact on health status. However, income inequalities in denture wearing exist. The aim of this study was to investigate how differing co-payment rates under the current Japanese Universal Health Insurance Coverage System affect income inequalities in denture non-use among older adults with severe tooth loss.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study used data from the 2019 Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study (JAGES). Self-administered questionnaires were mailed to 345 356 independent people who did not receive long-term care insurance benefits and were aged ≥65 years. The dependent variable was denture non-use, and the independent variable was the equivalent annual household income. The Slope Index of Inequality (SII) and Relative Index of Inequality (RII) were used with regression-based approaches to determine both absolute and relative inequalities in denture non-use by co-payment rates. The covariates were sex, age, years of education, number of teeth and comorbidities.

RESULTS

Of the 240 889 responses received (response rate =69.9%), we analysed 21 594 participants who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 72.8 years (standard deviation =4.1), and 57.6% were men. For 30 per cent, 20 per cent and 10 per cent co-payment rates, the percentages of people who did not use dentures and had severe tooth loss (≤9 teeth) were 18.3%, 13.3%, and 8.5%, respectively. All analyses confirmed significant inequalities in denture non-use. The lower the co-payment rate, the smaller the inequalities. SIIs for each co-payment rate were as follows: 30 per cent =13.35% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 9.61-17.09); 20 per cent =7.85% (95% CI = 4.88-10.81); and 10 per cent =4.85% (95% CI = 2.55-7.16). Inclusion of interaction term between income and co-payment rate significantly lowered the inequalities by co-payment rate in logistic regression analysis and SII. For RII, although the interaction was not statistically significant, a similar trend was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Income inequalities in denture use existed among older adults with severe tooth loss in Japan, and the inequalities appeared to be greater when the co-payment rate was higher.

摘要

目的

研究表明,佩戴义齿修复缺失的牙齿可以对健康状况产生积极影响。然而,在佩戴义齿方面存在收入不平等现象。本研究旨在调查在现行日本全民健康保险覆盖制度下,不同共付率如何影响严重缺牙的老年人中不使用义齿的收入不平等。

方法

本横断面研究使用了 2019 年日本老年评估研究(JAGES)的数据。向 345356 名未享受长期护理保险福利且年龄≥65 岁的独立人群邮寄了自我管理问卷。因变量为不使用义齿,自变量为等效家庭年收入。使用基于回归的方法,采用不平等斜率指数(SII)和相对不平等指数(RII)来确定不同共付率下义齿不使用率的绝对和相对不平等。协变量为性别、年龄、受教育年限、牙齿数量和合并症。

结果

在收到的 240889 份回复中(回复率为 69.9%),我们分析了符合纳入标准的 21594 名参与者。平均年龄为 72.8 岁(标准差为 4.1),其中 57.6%为男性。对于 30%、20%和 10%的共付率,不使用义齿且严重缺牙(≤9 颗)的人数百分比分别为 18.3%、13.3%和 8.5%。所有分析均证实了义齿不使用率存在显著的不平等现象。共付率越低,不平等程度越小。每个共付率的 SII 如下:30%=13.35%(95%置信区间[CI]:9.61-17.09);20%=7.85%(95%CI:4.88-10.81);10%=4.85%(95%CI:2.55-7.16)。在逻辑回归分析和 SII 中,包含收入和共付率之间的交互项显著降低了共付率的不平等。对于 RII,尽管交互项没有统计学意义,但观察到了类似的趋势。

结论

在日本严重缺牙的老年人中,使用义齿存在收入不平等现象,而且当共付率较高时,不平等现象似乎更为严重。

相似文献

1
Difference of income inequalities of denture use by co-payment rates: A JAGES cross-sectional study.按共付比率划分的义齿使用的收入不平等差异:一项 JAGES 横断面研究。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2023 Jun;51(3):557-564. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12749. Epub 2022 May 15.
2
Co-Payments and Inequality in Gingival Bleeding and Dental Visits.共付额与牙龈出血和牙科就诊的不平等。
Int Dent J. 2023 Oct;73(5):628-635. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.11.009. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
3
Inequalities of dental prosthesis use under universal healthcare insurance.全民健康保险制度下的义齿使用不平等。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;42(2):122-8. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12074. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
4
Education-related inequalities in oral health among older adults: Comparing Singapore and Japan.老年人口腔健康的教育相关不平等:新加坡与日本的比较。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2023 Aug;51(4):671-679. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12846. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
5
Does public transportation reduce inequalities in access to dental care among older adults? Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study.公共交通是否能减少老年人获得牙科护理方面的不平等?日本老年评估研究。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2020 Apr;48(2):109-118. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12508. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
6
Community Social Capital, Built Environment, and Income-Based Inequality in Depressive Symptoms Among Older People in Japan: An Ecological Study From the JAGES Project.社区社会资本、建成环境与日本老年人抑郁症状的收入不平等:JAGES 项目的生态研究。
J Epidemiol. 2018 Mar 5;28(3):108-116. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20160216. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
7
Education and income-based inequality in tooth loss among Brazilian adults: does the place you live make a difference?巴西成年人因教育和收入导致的牙齿缺失不平等:居住地点有影响吗?
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Sep 4;20(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01238-9.
8
Wider Dental Care Coverage Associated with Lower Oral Health Inequalities: A Comparison Study between Japan and England.更广泛的牙科保健覆盖范围与较低的口腔健康不平等相关:日本和英国的比较研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 31;17(15):5539. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155539.
9
Insurance coverage expansion and inequalities in unmet oral healthcare needs in Korea: Repeated cross-sectional analysis, 2007-2015.保险覆盖范围扩大与韩国未满足口腔保健需求的不平等:2007-2015 年重复横断面分析。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;49(3):232-239. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12594. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
10
Social inequalities in adult oral health in 40 low- and middle-income countries.40个低收入和中等收入国家成人口腔健康方面的社会不平等现象。
Int Dent J. 2016 Oct;66(5):295-303. doi: 10.1111/idj.12243. Epub 2016 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Contribution of dental prostheses on the association between dental visits and self- reported chewing ability among older Japanese adults: a cross-sectional study.假牙对日本老年人就诊牙科与自我报告的咀嚼能力之间关联的影响:一项横断面研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Aug 23;25(1):1363. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06673-0.
2
Understanding poor oral health among older adults in Türkiye: socioeconomic and healthcare access challenges.了解土耳其老年人口腔健康状况不佳的情况:社会经济和医疗保健获取方面的挑战。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 18;25(1):598. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05986-4.
3
Oral health inequalities among geriatric population: A systematic review.
老年人群口腔健康不平等状况:一项系统综述。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 Oct;13(10):4135-4144. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_328_24. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
4
Childhood Socioeconomic Status Affects Dental Pain in Later Life.童年时期的社会经济地位会影响日后的牙齿疼痛。
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2025 Apr;10(2):135-145. doi: 10.1177/23800844241271740. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
5
Edentulous disparities among geriatric population according to the sexual difference in South Korea: a nationwide population-based study.韩国老年人群中根据性别存在的无牙颌差异:一项全国性基于人群的研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 15;13(1):7854. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35029-3.
6
Co-Payments and Inequality in Gingival Bleeding and Dental Visits.共付额与牙龈出血和牙科就诊的不平等。
Int Dent J. 2023 Oct;73(5):628-635. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.11.009. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
7
Hypothetical Model of How a Clinical Remount Procedure Benefits Patients with Existing Dentures: A Narrative Literature Review.临床重衬程序如何使现有义齿患者受益的假设模型:一项叙述性文献综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jun 9;10(6):1067. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10061067.