Suppr超能文献

单腿机械性能和双侧反向跳跃中的双腿不对称性:不同计算方法的比较。

Single-leg mechanical performance and inter-leg asymmetries during bilateral countermovement jumps: A comparison of different calculation methods.

机构信息

Research Academy of Human Biomechanics, The Affiliated Hospital of Medical School of Ningbo University, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China; Faculty of Sports Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China; University of Belgrade, Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, The Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia.

University of Primorska, Faculty of Health Sciences, Izola, Slovenia; InnoRenew CoE, Human Health Department, Izola, Slovenia; S2P, Science to Practice, Ltd., Laboratory for Motor Control and Motor Behavior, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Gait Posture. 2022 Jul;96:47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.05.012. Epub 2022 May 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The possibility to selectively assess the force exerted by each leg during bilateral jumps has allowed sport scientists to explore inter-leg asymmetries, this metric being a rich source of research due to its potential applications to improve sports performance and reduce the risk of injury. The purpose of this study was to explore the reliability and agreement of single-leg mechanical performance and inter-leg asymmetry variables obtained by two procedures of analysis (Synchronous [simultaneous jump detection for both legs] and Asynchronous [specific jump detection for each leg]) during bilateral countermovement jumps (CMJs).

METHOD

During a single testing session, 74 participants performed 5 maximal height bilateral CMJs on dual force platforms (Kistler, model 9260AA6, Winterthur, Switzerland), and the 2 trials that differed the least in terms of squat depth and jump height were considered for statistical analyses. The following mechanical variables were calculated separately for each leg using the Synchronous and Asynchronous procedures: mean force, peak force, and propulsive impulse.

RESULTS

The procedures showed comparable reliability, except for mean force and propulsive impulse of the left leg (higher for the Asynchronous procedure). The agreement between the procedures was very high, while the most reliable mechanical variable was mean force (CV≈2.9%, ICC≈0.98), followed by peak force (CV≈4.4%, ICC≈0.96) and propulsive impulse (CV≈6.4%, ICC≈0.91). Reliability of inter-leg asymmetries was greater using mean and peak force (ICC range=0.74-0.82) than using propulsive impulse (ICC range = 0.65-0.66).

SIGNIFICANCE

Both Synchronous and Asynchronous procedures can be used to evaluate single-leg mechanical performance (mean force, peak force, and propulsive impulse) and asymmetries, whereas mean force should be used to evaluate single-leg mechanical performance and mean or peak force to assess asymmetries.

摘要

背景

通过选择性评估双腿在双侧跳跃过程中所施加的力,运动科学家得以探究双腿之间的不对称性。该指标具有丰富的研究价值,因为它可能有助于提高运动表现并降低受伤风险。本研究旨在探究两种分析程序(同步[同时检测双腿跳跃]和异步[分别检测双腿跳跃])获取的单腿机械性能和双腿不对称变量的可靠性和一致性,这些变量是在双侧反向跳跃(CMJ)中获得的。

方法

在单次测试中,74 名参与者在双力平台(Kistler,型号 9260AA6,瑞士温特图尔)上完成了 5 次最大高度的双侧 CMJ,并且在深蹲深度和跳跃高度方面差异最小的 2 次试验被用于统计分析。使用同步和异步程序分别计算每条腿的以下机械变量:平均力、峰值力和推进冲量。

结果

两种程序的可靠性相当,除了左腿的平均力和推进冲量(异步程序更高)。两种程序之间的一致性非常高,而最可靠的机械变量是平均力(变异系数≈2.9%,组内相关系数≈0.98),其次是峰值力(变异系数≈4.4%,组内相关系数≈0.96)和推进冲量(变异系数≈6.4%,组内相关系数≈0.91)。使用平均力和峰值力(组内相关系数范围=0.74-0.82)评估双腿不对称性的可靠性大于使用推进冲量(组内相关系数范围=0.65-0.66)。

意义

同步和异步程序均可用于评估单腿机械性能(平均力、峰值力和推进冲量)和不对称性,但平均力应用于评估单腿机械性能,而平均力或峰值力应用于评估不对称性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验