• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知洞察对从精神病前期到早期精神病阶段的临床洞察的影响。

Effect of cognitive insight on clinical insight from pre-morbid to early psychosis stages.

机构信息

Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Depatment of Psychiatry, Bejing Changping Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2022 Jul;313:114613. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114613. Epub 2022 May 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114613
PMID:35569423
Abstract

Poor cognitive insight, including low self-reflectiveness and high self-certainty, contributes to poor clinical insight, which includes awareness of illness, relabelling of specific symptoms, and treatment compliance. However, inconsistent results regarding cognitive insight among individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis (CHR) have been reported. This study investigated the difference in cognitive insight among groups with different severity of positive symptoms and analysed the effect of cognitive insight on clinical insight in each group. All participants, including CHR individuals with 3 or 4 points (L-P, n = 85) and 5 points (H-P, n = 37) on any positive-symptom item of the Scale of Prodromal Syndromes, and patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP, n = 59), were measured cognitive and clinical insight using the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale and the Schedule of Assessment of Insight, respectively. The self-reflectiveness of cognitive insight was highest in the L-P group and lowest in the FEP group. Self-reflectiveness was positively associated with awareness of illness in the L-P and FEP groups; both self-reflectiveness and self-certainty was positively associated with treatment compliance in the L-P group. Improving self-reflectiveness of cognitive insight may conduce to good clinical insight. Self-certainty may have different implication to individuals with mild prodromal symptoms.

摘要

认知洞察力差,包括自我反思能力低和自我确信度高,会导致临床洞察力差,包括对疾病的认识、对特定症状的重新标记以及治疗依从性。然而,在精神病高危人群(CHR)中,个体的认知洞察力存在不一致的结果。本研究调查了不同阳性症状严重程度的个体之间认知洞察力的差异,并分析了认知洞察力对每个组临床洞察力的影响。所有参与者,包括阳性症状项目中任何一项得 3 分或 4 分(L-P,n=85)和 5 分(H-P,n=37)的 CHR 个体,以及首发精神病患者(FEP,n=59),分别使用贝克认知洞察力量表和评估洞察力时间表来测量认知和临床洞察力。认知洞察力的自我反思在 L-P 组中最高,在 FEP 组中最低。自我反思与 L-P 和 FEP 组的疾病意识呈正相关;在 L-P 组中,自我反思和自我确信与治疗依从性呈正相关。提高认知洞察力的自我反思能力可能有助于获得良好的临床洞察力。自我确信对轻度前驱症状的个体可能有不同的影响。

相似文献

1
Effect of cognitive insight on clinical insight from pre-morbid to early psychosis stages.认知洞察对从精神病前期到早期精神病阶段的临床洞察的影响。
Psychiatry Res. 2022 Jul;313:114613. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114613. Epub 2022 May 10.
2
Relationships between self-reflectiveness and clinical symptoms in individuals during pre-morbid and early clinical stages of psychosis.精神病发病前和临床早期个体的自我反思能力与临床症状之间的关系。
Gen Psychiatr. 2022 May 31;35(3):e100696. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2021-100696. eCollection 2022.
3
A longitudinal study of cognitive insight and cortical thickness in first-episode psychosis.首发精神病认知洞察与皮质厚度的纵向研究。
Schizophr Res. 2018 Mar;193:251-260. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.06.048. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
4
Cognitive insight in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis compared to patients with first-episode psychosis and non-psychotic help-seeking youths.与首发精神病患者和非精神病求医者青年相比,超高精神病风险个体的认知洞察力。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2022 Jul;73:103107. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2022.103107. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
5
Can cognitive insight predict symptom remission in a first episode psychosis cohort?认知洞察力能否预测首发精神病队列中的症状缓解情况?
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Feb 6;17(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1210-9.
6
Cognitive insight in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis.精神病高危个体的认知洞察力。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2014 May;8(2):130-7. doi: 10.1111/eip.12023. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
7
Cognitive insight is associated with cortical thickness in first-episode psychosis.认知洞察力与首发精神病的皮质厚度相关。
Schizophr Res. 2016 Apr;172(1-3):16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.02.026. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
8
Understanding sex differences in cognitive insight across first-and-multiple episode psychosis.理解首发精神分裂症与反复发作精神分裂症患者认知洞察的性别差异。
Schizophr Res. 2020 Apr;218:276-282. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.12.024. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
9
The influence of gender in cognitive insight and cognitive bias in people with first-episode psychosis: an uncontrolled exploratory analysis.首发精神病患者认知洞察和认知偏差中的性别影响:一项未控制的探索性分析。
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2024 Oct;27(5):669-678. doi: 10.1007/s00737-024-01425-5. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
10
Differential associations of cognitive insight components with pretreatment characteristics in first-episode psychosis.首发精神病患者认知洞察成分与治疗前特征的差异关联。
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Feb 28;215(2):308-13. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.12.003. Epub 2013 Dec 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of aripiprazole on neurocognitive function in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis: A comparison with olanzapine and non-antipsychotic treatment.阿立哌唑对临床高危精神病个体神经认知功能的影响:与奥氮平和非抗精神病治疗的比较。
Eur Psychiatry. 2025 May 22;68(1):e69. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2459.
2
Timeframe for Conversion to Psychosis From Individuals at Clinical High-Risk: A Quantile Regression.临床高危个体发展为精神病的时间框架:分位数回归分析
Schizophr Bull. 2024 Jul 25. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbae129.
3
Cognitive complaint inversely associated to UHR transition.
认知主诉与超高风险转化呈负相关。
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2024 Jun 19;38:100319. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2024.100319. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Advancements and Future Directions in Prevention Based on Evaluation for Individuals With Clinical High Risk of Psychosis: Insights From the SHARP Study.基于对临床高风险精神病个体评估的预防进展与未来方向:来自SHARP研究的见解
Schizophr Bull. 2025 Mar 14;51(2):343-351. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbae066.
5
Duration of Untreated Prodromal Psychosis and Cognitive Impairments.未经治疗的前驱期精神病和认知障碍的持续时间。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2353426. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.53426.