• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在苏格兰和澳大利亚开展的 EMPOWER 混合数字干预预防精神分裂症复发的可行性聚类随机对照试验。

The EMPOWER blended digital intervention for relapse prevention in schizophrenia: a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial in Scotland and Australia.

机构信息

Glasgow Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Glasgow Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;9(6):477-486. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00103-1.

DOI:10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00103-1
PMID:35569503
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early warning signs monitoring by service users with schizophrenia has shown promise in preventing relapse but the quality of evidence is low. We aimed to establish the feasibility of undertaking a definitive randomised controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of a blended digital intervention for relapse prevention in schizophrenia.

METHODS

This multicentre, feasibility, cluster randomised controlled trial aimed to compare Early signs Monitoring to Prevent relapse in psychosis and prOmote Well-being, Engagement, and Recovery (EMPOWER) with treatment as usual in community mental health services (CMHS) in Glasgow and Melbourne. CMHS were the unit of randomisation, selected on the basis of those that probably had five or more care coordinators willing to participate. Participants were eligible if they were older than 16 years, had a schizophrenia or related diagnosis confirmed via case records, were able to provide informed consent, had contact with CMHS, and had had a relapse within the previous 2 years. Participants were randomised within stratified clusters to EMPOWER or to continue their usual approach to care. EMPOWER blended a smartphone for active monitoring of early warning signs with peer support to promote self-management and clinical triage to promote access to relapse prevention. Main outcomes were feasibility, acceptability, usability, and safety, which was assessed through face-to-face interviews. App usage was assessed via the smartphone and self-report. Primary end point was 12 months. Participants, research assistants and other team members involved in delivering the intervention were not masked to treatment conditions. Assessment of relapse was done by an independent adjudication panel masked to randomisation group. The study is registered at ISRCTN (99559262).

FINDINGS

We identified and randomised eight CMHS (six in Glasgow and two in Melbourne) comprising 47 care coordinators. We recruited 86 service users between Jan 19 and Aug 8, 2018; 73 were randomised (42 [58%] to EMPOWER and 31 [42%] to treatment as usual). There were 37 (51%) men and 36 (49%) women. At 12 months, main outcomes were collected for 32 (76%) of service users in the EMPOWER group and 30 (97%) of service users in the treatment as usual group. Of those randomised to EMPOWER, 30 (71%) met our a priori criterion of more than 33% adherence to daily monitoring that assumed feasibility. Median time to discontinuation of these participants was 31·5 weeks (SD 14·5). There were 29 adverse events in the EMPOWER group and 25 adverse events in the treatment as usual group. There were 13 app-related adverse events, affecting 11 people, one of which was serious. Fear of relapse was lower in the EMPOWER group than in the treatment as usual group at 12 months (mean difference -7·53 (95% CI -14·45 to 0·60; Cohen's d -0·53).

INTERPRETATION

A trial of digital technology to monitor early warning signs blended with peer support and clinical triage to detect and prevent relapse appears to be feasible, safe, and acceptable. A further main trial is merited.

FUNDING

UK National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

摘要

背景

服务使用者对精神分裂症的早期预警信号监测显示,该方法有望预防复发,但证据质量较低。我们旨在确定开展一项确定的随机对照试验的可行性,以确定针对精神分裂症复发预防的混合数字干预的有效性。

方法

这项多中心、可行性、集群随机对照试验旨在比较早期预警信号监测以预防精神病复发和促进幸福感、参与度和康复(EMPOWER)与常规社区精神卫生服务(CMHS)中的常规治疗。CMHS 是随机分组的单位,根据可能有五个或更多护理协调员愿意参与的单位进行选择。如果参与者年龄在 16 岁以上,通过病历记录确认患有精神分裂症或相关诊断,能够提供知情同意,与 CMHS 有联系,并且在过去 2 年内有过复发,则有资格参加。参与者按照分层聚类随机分配到 EMPOWER 组或继续接受常规护理。EMPOWER 将智能手机用于主动监测早期预警信号,并结合同伴支持来促进自我管理和临床分诊,以促进预防复发。主要结局是可行性、可接受性、可用性和安全性,这些都是通过面对面访谈来评估的。应用程序的使用情况通过智能手机和自我报告进行评估。主要终点是 12 个月。参与提供干预措施的参与者、研究助理和其他团队成员没有对治疗条件进行屏蔽。复发的评估是由一个独立的裁决小组进行的,该小组对随机分组情况进行了屏蔽。该研究在 ISRCTN 注册(ISRCTN99559262)。

结果

我们确定并随机分配了包括 47 名护理协调员在内的 8 个 CMHS(6 个在格拉斯哥,2 个在墨尔本)。我们在 2018 年 1 月 19 日至 8 月 8 日期间招募了 86 名服务使用者;73 名被随机分配(42[58%]为 EMPOWER,31[42%]为常规治疗)。其中 37 名(51%)为男性,36 名(49%)为女性。在 12 个月时,EMPOWER 组的 32 名(76%)和常规治疗组的 30 名(97%)服务使用者都收集了主要结局。在被分配到 EMPOWER 的参与者中,有 30 名(71%)达到了我们假设可行的每日监测超过 33%的依从性的预先确定标准。这些参与者的中位停药时间为 31.5 周(SD 14.5)。EMPOWER 组有 29 例不良事件,常规治疗组有 25 例不良事件。EMPOWER 组有 13 例与应用程序相关的不良事件,影响 11 人,其中 1 例为严重不良事件。与常规治疗组相比,EMPOWER 组在 12 个月时的复发恐惧程度较低(平均差值-7.53[95%CI-14.45 至 0.60;Cohen's d-0.53)。

解释

一项针对精神分裂症早期预警信号监测的数字技术试验,结合同伴支持和临床分诊,以检测和预防复发,似乎是可行的、安全的和可接受的。值得开展进一步的主要试验。

资助

英国国家卫生研究院卫生技术评估计划和澳大利亚国家卫生与医学研究理事会。

相似文献

1
The EMPOWER blended digital intervention for relapse prevention in schizophrenia: a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial in Scotland and Australia.在苏格兰和澳大利亚开展的 EMPOWER 混合数字干预预防精神分裂症复发的可行性聚类随机对照试验。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;9(6):477-486. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00103-1.
2
Digital smartphone intervention to recognise and manage early warning signs in schizophrenia to prevent relapse: the EMPOWER feasibility cluster RCT.数字化智能手机干预识别和管理精神分裂症早期预警信号以预防复发:EMPOWER 可行性聚类 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 May;26(27):1-174. doi: 10.3310/HLZE0479.
3
Early Signs Monitoring to Prevent Relapse in Psychosis and Promote Well-Being, Engagement, and Recovery: Protocol for a Feasibility Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Harnessing Mobile Phone Technology Blended With Peer Support.早期症状监测以预防精神病复发并促进幸福感、参与度和康复:一项利用手机技术与同伴支持相结合的可行性整群随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Jan 9;9(1):e15058. doi: 10.2196/15058.
4
A targeted psychological treatment for sleep problems in young people at ultra-high risk of psychosis in England (SleepWell): a parallel group, single-blind, randomised controlled feasibility trial.英格兰针对极早期精神病风险青年睡眠问题的靶向心理治疗(SleepWell):一项平行分组、单盲、随机对照可行性试验。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2023 Sep;10(9):706-718. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00203-1. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
5
Nicotine replacement treatment, e-cigarettes and an online behavioural intervention to reduce relapse in recent ex-smokers: a multinational four-arm RCT.尼古丁替代疗法、电子烟和在线行为干预减少近期戒烟者复吸:一项多国家四臂 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Dec;24(68):1-82. doi: 10.3310/hta24680.
6
A contingency management intervention to reduce cannabis use and time to relapse in early psychosis: the CIRCLE RCT.一项旨在减少早期精神病患者大麻使用和复发时间的权变管理干预措施:CIRCLE RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Aug;23(45):1-108. doi: 10.3310/hta23450.
7
Antipsychotic medication versus psychological intervention versus a combination of both in adolescents with first-episode psychosis (MAPS): a multicentre, three-arm, randomised controlled pilot and feasibility study.抗精神病药物与心理干预及两者联合用于首发精神病青少年(MAPS):一项多中心、三臂、随机对照试验性及可行性研究
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;7(9):788-800. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30248-0. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
8
Smartphone-Enhanced Symptom Management In Psychosis: Open, Randomized Controlled Trial.智能手机增强精神病症状管理:开放、随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 13;22(8):e17019. doi: 10.2196/17019.
9
Clinical effectiveness of an online psychoeducational and psychotherapeutic programme for caregivers of children newly diagnosed as autistic: a parallel, assessor-masked, randomised controlled trial in the UK (REACH-ASD).一项针对新诊断为自闭症儿童的照料者的在线心理教育与心理治疗项目的临床疗效:英国的一项平行、评估者设盲、随机对照试验(REACH-ASD)
Lancet Psychiatry. 2025 Apr;12(4):289-302. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(25)00036-7. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
10
A smoking cessation smartphone app that delivers real-time 'context aware' behavioural support: the Quit Sense feasibility RCT.一款能提供实时“情境感知”行为支持的戒烟智能手机应用:Quit Sense 可行性 RCT。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Apr;12(4):1-99. doi: 10.3310/KQYT5412.

引用本文的文献

1
The ILIA study: protocol for a randomized-controlled multicenter clinical trial on smartphone- and web-based relapse monitoring for patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.ILIA研究:一项针对精神分裂症或精神分裂情感性障碍患者基于智能手机和网络的复发监测的随机对照多中心临床试验方案。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Aug 19. doi: 10.1007/s00406-025-02089-7.
2
"Who blends in and why (not)?" A qualitative study on psychotherapists' patient inclusion in blended care.“谁融入其中以及为何(不)融入?”一项关于心理治疗师在混合式照护中接纳患者情况的定性研究。
Internet Interv. 2025 Jun 18;41:100847. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2025.100847. eCollection 2025 Sep.
3
A Novel Digital Intervention to Facilitate Diabetes Self-Management Among People with Schizophrenia and Related Disorders: Development and Acceptability Testing of SMART.
一种促进精神分裂症及相关障碍患者糖尿病自我管理的新型数字干预措施:SMART的开发与可接受性测试
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2025 Jun 26;21:1289-1305. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S513272. eCollection 2025.
4
[Youth mental health: early detection and early intervention of mental disorders].[青少年心理健康:精神障碍的早期发现与早期干预]
Nervenarzt. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s00115-025-01847-1.
5
Practical AI application in psychiatry: historical review and future directions.人工智能在精神病学中的实际应用:历史回顾与未来方向。
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 3. doi: 10.1038/s41380-025-03072-3.
6
The evolving field of digital mental health: current evidence and implementation issues for smartphone apps, generative artificial intelligence, and virtual reality.数字心理健康的发展领域:智能手机应用程序、生成式人工智能和虚拟现实的当前证据及实施问题
World Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;24(2):156-174. doi: 10.1002/wps.21299.
7
The era of digital mental health interventions: we know they can be effective but are they also safe?数字心理健康干预时代:我们知道它们可能有效,但它们也安全吗?
BJPsych Open. 2025 Apr 21;11(3):e89. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2025.42.
8
Mental Health Professionals' Technology Usage and Attitudes Toward Digital Health for Psychosis: Comparative Cross-Sectional Survey Study.精神卫生专业人员对精神病数字健康的技术使用及态度:比较横断面调查研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Mar 31;12:e68362. doi: 10.2196/68362.
9
Clusters of Patient Empowerment and Mental Health Literacy Differentiate Professional Help-Seeking Attitudes in Online Mental Health Communities Users.患者赋权与心理健康素养集群区分在线心理健康社区用户的专业求助态度。
Health Expect. 2025 Feb;28(1):e70153. doi: 10.1111/hex.70153.
10
Utility of Consumer-Grade Wearable Devices for Inferring Physical and Mental Health Outcomes in Severe Mental Illness: Systematic Review.消费级可穿戴设备在推断严重精神疾病患者身心健康结果方面的效用:系统评价
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Jan 7;12:e65143. doi: 10.2196/65143.