文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Mental Health Professionals' Technology Usage and Attitudes Toward Digital Health for Psychosis: Comparative Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

作者信息

Zhang Xiaolong, Berry Natalie, Di Basilio Daniela, Richardson Cara, Eisner Emily, Bucci Sandra

机构信息

Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom, 44 161 306 0422.

Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Mar 31;12:e68362. doi: 10.2196/68362.


DOI:10.2196/68362
PMID:40163639
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11975120/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Digital health technologies (DHTs) for psychosis have been developed and tested rapidly in recent years. However, research examining mental health professionals' views on the use of DHTs for people with psychosis is limited. Given the increased accessibility and availability of DHTs for psychosis, an up-to-date understanding of staff perception of DHTs for psychosis is warranted. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to investigate mental health professionals' usage of technology and their perception of service users' technology usage; their views toward the use of DHTs for psychosis, including their concerns; and barriers for implementing DHTs in a mental health setting. METHODS: Two cross-sectional surveys were distributed to mental health care staff who had experience of working with individuals experiencing psychosis in the United Kingdom. Survey 1 (from April 2018 to September 2020) was distributed to 3 local UK National Health Service (NHS) trusts in Northwest England; survey 2 was administered nationally across 31 UK NHS trusts or health boards (from November 2022 to March 2024). The COVID-19 pandemic occurred between the 2 survey periods. Data were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: A total of 155 and 352 participants completed surveys 1 and 2, respectively. Staff reported high levels of technology ownership and usage in both surveys. In general, staff expressed positive views regarding the use of DHTs for psychosis; however, barriers and concerns, including affordability, digital literacy, and potential negative effects on service users' mental health, were also reported. We did not find notable changes in terms of staff use of digital technology in clinical practice over time. CONCLUSIONS: Staff sampled from a broad and diverse range expressed consistent optimism about the potential implementation of DHTs in practice, though they also noted some concerns regarding safety and access. While the COVID-19 pandemic is frequently regarded as a catalyst for the adoption of digital health care tools, the sustainability of this transition from traditional to digital health care appeared to be suboptimal. To address staff concerns regarding safety and potentially facilitate the implementation of DHTs, systematic evaluation of adverse effects of using DHTs and dissemination of evidence are needed. Organizational support and training should be offered to staff to help address barriers and increase confidence in recommending and using DHTs with service users.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52ce/11975120/e3d432173a23/mental-v12-e68362-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52ce/11975120/e3d432173a23/mental-v12-e68362-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52ce/11975120/e3d432173a23/mental-v12-e68362-g001.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Mental Health Professionals' Technology Usage and Attitudes Toward Digital Health for Psychosis: Comparative Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

JMIR Ment Health. 2025-3-31

[2]
Mental health professionals views and the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on implementing digital mental health in China: A nationwide survey study.

Internet Interv. 2022-9-24

[3]
Facilitators and Barriers to the Implementation of Digital Health Technologies in Hospital Settings in Lower- and Middle-Income Countries Since the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2025-3-6

[4]
Current experience and future potential of facilitating access to digital NHS primary care services in England: the Di-Facto mixed-methods study.

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024-9

[5]
Technology use and attitudes towards digital mental health in people with severe mental health problems: a survey study in China.

Front Psychiatry. 2023-11-22

[6]
Usage, Attitudes, Facilitators, and Barriers Toward Digital Health Technologies in Musculoskeletal Care: Survey Among Primary Care Physiotherapists in Norway.

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024-9-16

[7]
Digital Transformation of Rheumatology Care in Germany: Cross-Sectional National Survey.

J Med Internet Res. 2025-1-6

[8]
A service-user digital intervention to collect real-time safety information on acute, adult mental health wards: the WardSonar mixed-methods study.

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024-5

[9]
Digital tools to support mental health: a survey study in psychosis.

BMC Psychiatry. 2023-10-7

[10]
The Resilience Hub approach for addressing mental health of health and social care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods evaluation.

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024-9

本文引用的文献

[1]
Barriers and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions for People With Psychosis or Bipolar Disorder: Systematic Review and Best-Fit Framework Synthesis.

JMIR Ment Health. 2025-1-20

[2]
Digital Mental Health for Schizophrenia and Other Severe Mental Illnesses: An International Consensus on Current Challenges and Potential Solutions.

JMIR Ment Health. 2024-5-8

[3]
Measurement of Adverse Events in Studies of Digital Health Interventions for Psychosis: Guidance and Recommendations Based on a Literature Search and Framework Analysis of Standard Operating Procedures.

Schizophr Bull. 2024-11-8

[4]
Adverse Events Reporting in Digital Interventions Evaluations for Psychosis: A Systematic Literature Search and Individual Level Content Analysis of Adverse Event Reports.

Schizophr Bull. 2024-11-8

[5]
Health Care Professionals' Views on the Use of Passive Sensing, AI, and Machine Learning in Mental Health Care: Systematic Review With Meta-Synthesis.

JMIR Ment Health. 2024-1-23

[6]
Digitalising mental health care: Practical recommendations from the European Psychiatric Association.

Eur Psychiatry. 2023-12-13

[7]
Using digital technology to promote physical health in mental healthcare: A sequential mixed-methods study of clinicians' views.

Early Interv Psychiatry. 2024-2

[8]
Digital mental health: challenges and next steps.

BMJ Ment Health. 2023-2

[9]
Effect of Technology-Enhanced Screening in Addition to Standard Targeted Clinician Education on the Duration of Untreated Psychosis: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA Psychiatry. 2023-2-1

[10]
Remote mental health care interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: An umbrella review.

Behav Res Ther. 2022-12

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索