• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同的钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂:它们能预防死亡吗?

Different Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors: Can They Prevent Death?

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Department of Medicine, KPC Medical College & Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

出版信息

Endocr Pract. 2022 Aug;28(8):795-801. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2022.05.005. Epub 2022 May 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.eprac.2022.05.005
PMID:35569736
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) in cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) demonstrate cardiovascular (CV) safety and benefits. Some dedicated randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrate benefit in terms of renal outcomes and hospitalization due to heart failure (HF). RCTs report differences in the secondary outcomes with respect to mortality (CV and/or all-cause). We undertook a meta-analysis of all SGLT2is for which in addition to CVOT, HF outcome/renal outcome studies are available to establish whether individual SGLT2is were able to prevent death.

METHODS

We included available event-driven randomized, placebo-controlled CVOTs and dedicated RCTs of SGLT2is exploring renal outcomes and HF. We included 3 trials of empagliflozin, 3 of dapagliflozin, 2 of canagliflozin, and 2 of sotagliflozin. The efficacy outcomes included all-cause mortality and CV mortality. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were pooled for individual molecules.

RESULTS

The HR for all-cause mortality including all trials was 0.86 (0.80-0.93). The HRs for all-cause mortality in empagliflozin (N = 16 738), dapagliflozin (N = 26 208), canagliflozin (N = 14 543), and sotagliflozin (N = 11 806) were 0.86 (0.69-1.08), 0.83 (0.72-0.97), 0.86 (0.75-0.97), and 0.95 (0.81-1.11), respectively. The HR for CV mortality including all trials was 0.85 (0.78-0.92). The HRs for CV mortality in empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, sotagliflozin, and canagliflozin were 0.81 (0.63-1.03), 0.88 (0.78-1.00), 0.89 (0.74-1.07), and 0.84 (0.72-0.98), respectively.

CONCLUSION

SGLT2is as a class reduce both all-cause mortality and CV mortality. Canagliflozin possibly reduces both all-cause mortality and CV mortality, whereas dapagliflozin may reduce all-cause mortality but not CV mortality. Empagliflozin and sotagliflozin may reduce neither.

摘要

目的

钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂(SGLT2is)在心血管结局试验(CVOTs)中显示出心血管(CV)安全性和益处。一些专门的随机对照试验(RCTs)证明了在肾脏结局和心力衰竭(HF)住院方面的获益。RCT 报告了次要结局方面死亡率(CV 和/或全因)的差异。我们对所有 SGLT2is 进行了荟萃分析,这些 SGLT2is 除了 CVOT 外,还可获得心力衰竭/肾脏结局研究的结果,以确定个别 SGLT2is 是否能够预防死亡。

方法

我们纳入了可用的事件驱动型随机、安慰剂对照的 SGLT2is CVOTs 和专门探索肾脏结局和 HF 的 RCTs。我们纳入了恩格列净的 3 项试验、达格列净的 3 项试验、卡格列净的 2 项试验和索格列净的 2 项试验。疗效结局包括全因死亡率和 CV 死亡率。个体分子的汇总风险比(HRs)及其 95%置信区间(CIs)。

结果

包括所有试验在内的全因死亡率的 HR 为 0.86(0.80-0.93)。恩格列净(N=16738)、达格列净(N=26208)、卡格列净(N=14543)和索格列净(N=11806)的全因死亡率 HR 分别为 0.86(0.69-1.08)、0.83(0.72-0.97)、0.86(0.75-0.97)和 0.95(0.81-1.11)。包括所有试验在内的 CV 死亡率的 HR 为 0.85(0.78-0.92)。恩格列净、达格列净、索格列净和卡格列净的 CV 死亡率 HR 分别为 0.81(0.63-1.03)、0.88(0.78-1.00)、0.89(0.74-1.07)和 0.84(0.72-0.98)。

结论

SGLT2is 作为一类药物可降低全因死亡率和 CV 死亡率。卡格列净可能降低全因死亡率和 CV 死亡率,而达格列净可能降低全因死亡率但不降低 CV 死亡率。恩格列净和索格列净可能都无法降低这两种死亡率。

相似文献

1
Different Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors: Can They Prevent Death?不同的钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂:它们能预防死亡吗?
Endocr Pract. 2022 Aug;28(8):795-801. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2022.05.005. Epub 2022 May 13.
2
Comparative cardiovascular benefits of individual SGLT2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes and heart failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.比较 2 型糖尿病和心力衰竭患者中不同 SGLT2 抑制剂的心血管获益:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Dec 20;14:1216160. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1216160. eCollection 2023.
3
Use of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Clinical Practice for Heart Failure Prevention and Treatment: Beyond Type 2 Diabetes. A Narrative Review.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂在心力衰竭预防和治疗中的临床应用:超越 2 型糖尿病。一篇叙述性综述。
Adv Ther. 2022 Feb;39(2):845-861. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01989-z. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
4
Comparative efficacy of 5 sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor and 7 glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists interventions on cardiorenal outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients: A network meta-analysis based on cardiovascular or renal outcome trials.基于心血管或肾脏结局试验的 2 型糖尿病患者中 5 种钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂和 7 种胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂干预措施对心肾结局的比较疗效:网络荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jul 30;100(30):e26431. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026431.
5
Cardiovascular and renal outcomes with sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A system review and network meta-analysis.2型糖尿病患者使用钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂的心血管和肾脏结局:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Nov 24;13:986186. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.986186. eCollection 2022.
6
Influence of receptor selectivity on benefits from SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and head-to-head comparative efficacy network meta-analysis.受体选择性对心力衰竭患者 SGLT2 抑制剂获益的影响:系统评价和头对头比较疗效网络荟萃分析。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2022 Apr;111(4):428-439. doi: 10.1007/s00392-021-01913-z. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
7
Cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin versus canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, or standard of care in patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease.恩格列净与卡格列净、达格列净或标准治疗方案相比在2型糖尿病合并已确诊心血管疾病患者中的成本效益
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 May;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001313.
8
Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and cardiovascular clinical outcomes in acute heart failure: A narrative review.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与急性心力衰竭的心血管临床结局:叙事性综述。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2023 Jun 22;80(13):818-826. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxad061.
9
Impact of SGLT2 inhibitors on patient outcomes: a network meta-analysis.SGLT2 抑制剂对患者结局的影响:网状荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023 Oct 27;22(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-02035-8.
10
Indirect comparison of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with established heart failure: evidence based on Bayesian methods.基于贝叶斯方法的已确诊心力衰竭患者中 SGLT2 抑制剂的间接比较。
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Apr;10(2):1231-1241. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14297. Epub 2023 Jan 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Early Initiation of Sodium-Glucose Co-transporter-2 Inhibitors Following Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.急性心肌梗死后早期启动钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和Meta分析
touchREV Endocrinol. 2025 May;21(1):14-23. doi: 10.17925/EE.2025.21.1.1. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
2
SGLT2 Inhibitors: Paradigm Shift from Diabetes Care to Metabolic Care-An Indian Perspective.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂:从糖尿病护理到代谢护理的范式转变——印度视角
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2024 Jan-Feb;28(1):11-18. doi: 10.4103/ijem.ijem_377_23. Epub 2024 Feb 26.