Suppr超能文献

基于贝叶斯方法的已确诊心力衰竭患者中 SGLT2 抑制剂的间接比较。

Indirect comparison of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with established heart failure: evidence based on Bayesian methods.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510317.

Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510515.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Apr;10(2):1231-1241. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14297. Epub 2023 Jan 26.

Abstract

AIMS

Head-to-head comparisons among SGLT2 inhibitors treatments in established heart failure remain absent. We conducted a systematic review of dedicated heart failure trials to assess indirectly the composite outcomes and individual clinical endpoints among SGLT2 inhibitor treatments.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials comparing SGLT2 inhibitors versus placebo in patients with established heart failure. A Bayesian approach to network meta-analysis was applied. Five trials including four treatment strategies were included in this study. The composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure showed no significant difference in the comparison between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.66-1.55), dapagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.91-2.65), and empagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 1.53, 95% CI 0.90-2.69). All-cause mortality showed no significant difference in the comparison between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.711-1.18), dapagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.68-1.59), and empagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.74-1.73). Cardiovascular death showed no significant difference in the comparison between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.71-1.23), dapagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.61-1.55), and empagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.64-1.66). Hospitalization for heart failure showed no significant difference in the comparison between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.64-1.97), dapagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 1.56, 95% CI 0.74-3.15), and empagliflozin and sotagliflozin (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.68-2.78).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with established heart failure, there was no significant difference of the major efficacy outcomes among SGLT2 inhibitor treatments; however, sotagliflozin may be associated with the lowest risk of the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure, and dapagliflozin may be associated with the lowest risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.

摘要

目的

在已确立的心力衰竭患者中,SGLT2 抑制剂治疗的头对头比较仍然缺乏。我们进行了一项专门针对心力衰竭试验的系统评价,以评估 SGLT2 抑制剂治疗之间的复合结局和个别临床终点的间接情况。

方法和结果

我们系统地审查了比较 SGLT2 抑制剂与安慰剂在已确立的心力衰竭患者中的随机对照试验。采用贝叶斯网络荟萃分析方法。本研究纳入了五项比较达格列净、恩格列净、索格列净治疗的试验,共涉及四种治疗策略。心血管死亡或心力衰竭住院的复合终点在达格列净与恩格列净(OR 1.00,95%CI 0.66-1.55)、达格列净与索格列净(OR 1.54,95%CI 0.91-2.65)以及恩格列净与索格列净(OR 1.53,95%CI 0.90-2.69)之间无显著差异。达格列净与恩格列净(OR 0.92,95%CI 0.711-1.18)、达格列净与索格列净(OR 1.05,95%CI 0.68-1.59)以及恩格列净与索格列净(OR 1.14,95%CI 0.74-1.73)之间的全因死亡率也无显著差异。达格列净与恩格列净(OR 0.94,95%CI 0.71-1.23)、达格列净与索格列净(OR 0.96,95%CI 0.61-1.55)以及恩格列净与索格列净(OR 1.03,95%CI 0.64-1.66)之间的心血管死亡率也无显著差异。达格列净与恩格列净(OR 1.13,95%CI 0.64-1.97)、达格列净与索格列净(OR 1.56,95%CI 0.74-3.15)以及恩格列净与索格列净(OR 1.39,95%CI 0.68-2.78)之间的心力衰竭住院率也无显著差异。

结论

在已确立的心力衰竭患者中,SGLT2 抑制剂治疗之间主要疗效结局无显著差异;然而,索格列净可能与心血管死亡或心力衰竭住院的复合终点风险最低相关,而达格列净可能与全因和心血管死亡率风险最低相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b3b/10053258/26d13ee88fb3/EHF2-10-1231-g002.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验