Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida; Yale University Eye Center, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Ophthalmol Retina. 2022 Nov;6(11):1001-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2022.05.004. Epub 2022 May 13.
To investigate the mechanical properties of 23-, 25-, and 27-gauge vitrectomy vitrectors across 3 different vitrectomy systems to inform surgical techniques.
An experimental study that did not involve any human subjects.
Nine vitrectors (3 each of 23-, 25-, and 27 gauge) from Alcon, Dutch Ophthalmic Research Center (DORC), and Bausch & Lomb (B/L) were measured. Measurements were performed using electroforce displacement at the tip and 15 mm from the tip. Five measurements were performed at each location, and fully elastic deformation was ensured.
The main parameter being measured was the force in grams (gf) necessary to deflect the vitrectors vertically downward by 1 mm, either at the tip of the vitrector or 15 mm from the tip.
A total of 90 measurements were performed. Across brands, B/L demonstrated the least stiffness at both the tip and at the 15-mm point for 23-gauge (8.0±0.3gf, 67.3±1.0gf), 25-gauge (6.8±0.3gf, 60.5±0.4gf), and 27-gauge (3.3±0.1gf, 33.9±0.5gf) vitrectors. Although there was only a small decrease in the stiffness in the 25-gauge vitrector compared with the 23-gauge vitrector at the 15-mm point, this difference was statistically significant for Alcon (P < 0.001), DORC (P < 0.001), and B/L (P < 0.001).
Based on this study, 25-gauge vitrectors, although larger than the 27-gauge vitrectors and less stiff than the 23-gauge vitrectors, may offer favorable compromise between stiffness and gauge size. However, surgeon experience, preference, and the type of surgery being performed should be paramount when making the final vitrector selection. Knowledge of these mechanical properties may aid surgeons in choosing between gauge size and vitrectomy system to optimize their comfort and efficiency.
研究 3 种不同玻璃体切割系统中 23、25 和 27 号玻璃体切割器的机械性能,为手术技术提供信息。
不涉及任何人体受试者的实验研究。
测量了来自爱尔康、荷兰眼科研究中心(DORC)和博士伦(B/L)的 9 个玻璃体切割器(每个 23、25 和 27 号各 3 个)。在尖端和距尖端 15 毫米处使用电动力位移进行测量。在每个位置进行了 5 次测量,确保完全弹性变形。
主要测量参数为使玻璃体切割器垂直向下偏转 1 毫米所需的力(gf),要么在玻璃体切割器的尖端,要么在距尖端 15 毫米处。
共进行了 90 次测量。在品牌方面,B/L 在 23 号(8.0±0.3gf,67.3±1.0gf)、25 号(6.8±0.3gf,60.5±0.4gf)和 27 号(3.3±0.1gf,33.9±0.5gf)玻璃体切割器的尖端和 15 毫米处表现出最小的刚度。尽管 25 号玻璃体切割器在 15 毫米处的刚度与 23 号玻璃体切割器相比只有微小的下降,但这一差异在 Alcon(P < 0.001)、DORC(P < 0.001)和 B/L(P < 0.001)方面均具有统计学意义。
基于这项研究,25 号玻璃体切割器虽然比 27 号玻璃体切割器大,但比 23 号玻璃体切割器刚度小,可能在刚度和口径尺寸之间提供有利的折衷。然而,在做出最终的玻璃体切割器选择时,外科医生的经验、偏好和所进行的手术类型应该是最重要的。了解这些机械性能可能有助于外科医生在选择口径尺寸和玻璃体切割系统之间做出选择,以优化他们的舒适度和效率。