• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[重度哮喘患者及表型中生物制剂的重叠适用性]

[THE OVERLAPPING ELIGIBILITY FOR BIOLOGICS IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE ASTHMA AND PHENOTYPES].

作者信息

Ito Ayaka, Miyoshi Shoki, Toyota Hikaru, Suzuki Yuki, Uehara Yuki, Hattori Saya, Takeshita Yuri, Sakasegawa Hirokazu, Kuramochi Michio, Kobayashi Konomi, Sugimoto Naoya, Nagase Hiroyuki

机构信息

Division of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Department of Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine.

出版信息

Arerugi. 2022;71(3):210-220. doi: 10.15036/arerugi.71.210.

DOI:10.15036/arerugi.71.210
PMID:35569943
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biologics are an important treatment option for patients with severe asthma. Four biologics are available in Japan, and an overlapping eligibility has been observed. The eligibility and availability of drugs depend on the local regulations of different countries. However, there is no precise information about the eligibility for biologics, including dupilumab, in Japan. The aim of the study was to investigate the overlapping eligibility and to analyze the phenotypes of patients with multiple eligibility.

METHODS

In this observational study, a retrospective chart review of patients was performed. The eligibility criteria for omalizumab were IgE 30-1500IU/mL and positive IgE for perennial aeroallergen. The eligibility criteria for IL-5-targeted biologics (mepolizumab and benralizumab) were eosinophil counts (Eos) > 150μL, while those for dupilumab were Eos > 150μL or fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) > 150ppb or IgE > 167IU/mL. Severe asthma was defined by the severity criteria under treatment based on Japanese guidelines for adult asthma.

RESULTS

One hundred patients with severe asthma were identified. The eligibility for omalizumab, IL-5-targeted therapies, and dupilumab was 43%, 69%, and 82%, respectively. Thirty percent of the patients were eligible for all the four biologics and showed the lowest FEV1, frequent exacerbation history, and the highest levels of Eos, FeNO, and serum periostin. Only 11% of the patients were not indicated for any biologics.

CONCLUSION

A considerable portion of patients was eligible for all the biologics. Asthma control was poor, and type 2 inflammation was prominent in such patients.

摘要

背景

生物制剂是重度哮喘患者的重要治疗选择。日本有四种生物制剂可供使用,且已观察到存在重叠的适用资格情况。药物的适用资格和可获得性取决于不同国家的当地法规。然而,在日本,关于包括度普利尤单抗在内的生物制剂的适用资格尚无确切信息。本研究的目的是调查重叠的适用资格情况,并分析具有多种适用资格的患者的表型。

方法

在这项观察性研究中,对患者进行了回顾性病历审查。奥马珠单抗的适用标准为免疫球蛋白E(IgE)30 - 1500IU/mL且对常年性气传变应原IgE呈阳性。白细胞介素-5靶向生物制剂(美泊利单抗和贝那利珠单抗)的适用标准为嗜酸性粒细胞计数(Eos)>150μL,而度普利尤单抗的适用标准为Eos>150μL或呼出一氧化氮分数(FeNO)>150ppb或IgE>167IU/mL。重度哮喘根据日本成人哮喘指南中治疗时的严重程度标准来定义。

结果

共确定了100例重度哮喘患者。奥马珠单抗、白细胞介素-5靶向疗法和度普利尤单抗的适用率分别为43%、69%和82%。30%的患者符合所有四种生物制剂的适用标准,且其第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)最低,有频繁的加重病史,嗜酸性粒细胞、FeNO和血清骨膜蛋白水平最高。仅11%的患者未被推荐使用任何生物制剂。

结论

相当一部分患者符合所有生物制剂的适用标准。这些患者的哮喘控制不佳,且2型炎症突出。

相似文献

1
[THE OVERLAPPING ELIGIBILITY FOR BIOLOGICS IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE ASTHMA AND PHENOTYPES].[重度哮喘患者及表型中生物制剂的重叠适用性]
Arerugi. 2022;71(3):210-220. doi: 10.15036/arerugi.71.210.
2
Biologics for severe asthma: The real-world evidence, effectiveness of switching, and prediction factors for the efficacy.重度哮喘的生物制剂:真实世界证据、换药有效性及疗效预测因素
Allergol Int. 2023 Jan;72(1):11-23. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2022.11.008. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
3
Omalizumab as alternative to chronic use of oral corticosteroids in severe asthma.奥马珠单抗可作为严重哮喘中慢性口服皮质类固醇替代疗法。
Respir Med. 2019 Apr;150:51-62. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
4
Treatment Resistance in Severe Asthma Patients With a Combination of High Fraction of Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Low Blood Eosinophil Counts.呼出一氧化氮高分数与低血嗜酸性粒细胞计数相结合的重度哮喘患者的治疗抵抗
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Apr 20;13:836635. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.836635. eCollection 2022.
5
Clinical characteristics of complete responders versus non-complete responders to omalizumab, benralizumab and mepolizumab in patients with severe asthma: a long-term retrospective analysis.奥马珠单抗、贝那利珠单抗和美泊利珠单抗治疗重度哮喘患者中完全应答者与非完全应答者的临床特征:一项长期回顾性分析。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2317356. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2317356. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
6
Pragmatic Clinical Perspective on Biologics for Severe Refractory Type 2 Asthma.关于生物制剂治疗重度难治性2型哮喘的实用临床观点
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Nov-Dec;8(10):3363-3370. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.06.048. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
7
When sequential use of mepolizumab and dupilumab in a severe atopic eosinophilic asthmatic questions the role of eosinophils in mediating the clinical expression of the disease: a case report.美泊利珠单抗和度匹鲁单抗序贯治疗重度特应性嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘质疑嗜酸性粒细胞在介导疾病临床表型中的作用:病例报告。
J Med Case Rep. 2024 Jan 31;18(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13256-023-04255-8.
8
Pairwise indirect treatment comparison of dupilumab versus other biologics in patients with uncontrolled persistent asthma.在未控制的持续性哮喘患者中,度普利尤单抗与其他生物制剂的两两间接治疗比较。
Respir Med. 2022 Jan;191:105991. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2020.105991. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
9
Association between pre-biologic T2-biomarker combinations and response to biologics in patients with severe asthma.严重哮喘患者中 T2 生物标志物组合与生物制剂应答之间的关联。
Front Immunol. 2024 Apr 19;15:1361891. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1361891. eCollection 2024.
10
Biologic treatment eligibility for real-world patients with severe asthma: The IDEAL study.重度哮喘真实世界患者的生物治疗适用性:理想研究
J Asthma. 2018 Feb;55(2):152-160. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2017.1322611. Epub 2017 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Biologics in T2 Severe Asthma: Unveiling Different Effectiveness by Real-World Indirect Comparison.2型重度哮喘中的生物制剂:通过真实世界间接比较揭示不同疗效
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 13;13(16):4750. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164750.