Suppr超能文献

种植体螺纹和直径如何影响“all-on-four”(全口四颗种植)技术的成功率?一项三维有限元分析研究。

How do implant threads and diameters affect the all-on-four success? A 3D finite element analysis study.

作者信息

Zor Zeynep Fatma, Kılınç Yeliz, Erkmen Erkan, Kurt Ahmet

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Atılım University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Technol Health Care. 2022;30(5):1031-1042. doi: 10.3233/THC-213072.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effect of different thread designs and diameters on the all-on-four concept is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to clarify the differences in stress distribution of dental implants with various thread designs and diameters based on the all-on-four concept with three dimensional (3D) finite element analysis (FEA).

METHODS

A 3D model of a totally edentulous mandible was used to perform the FEA. Four different models (M1, M2, M3, and M4) including 3.5 and 4.3 mm diameter dental implants with active and passive threaded designs were generated. The dental implants were positioned according to the all-on-four concept. The Von Mises stresses on dental implants and maximum and minimum principal stresses (Pmax and Pmin) on bony structures were calculated under vertical, oblique and horizontal loads.

RESULTS

For Von Mises stresses, the highest stress values were detected on the distal implants for all models. Distal implants had also the highest stress values for vertical loading. The Von Mises stresses were found to be concentrated around the implant's neck. In all models the highest Pmax and Pmin stresses occurred in the bone surrounding the distal implant. It was noted that the active threaded implants showed the highest Pmax and Pmin stress values.

CONCLUSION

The implant thread design and diameter might have a strong influence on the stress values in the all-on-four concept.

摘要

背景

不同螺纹设计和直径对全口四种植体理念的影响尚不清楚。

目的

本研究的目的是基于全口四种植体理念,通过三维(3D)有限元分析(FEA)阐明不同螺纹设计和直径的牙种植体应力分布的差异。

方法

使用无牙颌下颌骨的3D模型进行有限元分析。生成了四个不同的模型(M1、M2、M3和M4),包括直径为3.5和4.3mm的具有主动和被动螺纹设计的牙种植体。根据全口四种植体理念定位牙种植体。在垂直、倾斜和水平载荷下计算牙种植体上的冯·米塞斯应力以及骨结构上的最大和最小主应力(Pmax和Pmin)。

结果

对于冯·米塞斯应力,所有模型中远端种植体上检测到的应力值最高。远端种植体在垂直载荷下也具有最高的应力值。发现冯·米塞斯应力集中在种植体颈部周围。在所有模型中,最高的Pmax和Pmin应力出现在远端种植体周围的骨中。值得注意的是,主动螺纹种植体显示出最高的Pmax和Pmin应力值。

结论

种植体螺纹设计和直径可能对全口四种植体理念中的应力值有很大影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验