• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三维有限元分析比较全口 4 颗种植体即刻负重治疗概念中不同种植体材料和后牙种植体角度的生物力学差异。

Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic materials and posterior implant angles in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite element analysis.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bursa Uludağ University, Bursa, Turkey.

出版信息

Biomed Tech (Berl). 2022 May 20;67(4):307-315. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2022-0109. Print 2022 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1515/bmt-2022-0109
PMID:35587648
Abstract

The study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical behaviors of different prosthetic materials and posterior implant angles in All-on-4 implant-supported fixed maxillary prostheses with three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis. The model of complete edentulous maxilla was created using the Rhinoceros and VRMesh Studio programs. Anterior vertical and 17°- and 30°-angled posterior implants were positioned with All-on-4 design. Straigth and angled multi-unit abutments scanned using a 3D scanner. Two different prosthetic superstructures (monolithic zirconia framework and lithium disilicate veneer (ZL) and monolithic zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS)) were modeled. Four models designed according to the prosthetic structure and posterior implant angles. Posterior vertical bilateral loading and frontal oblique loading was performed. The principal stresses (bone tissues-Pmax and Pmin) and von Mises equivalent stresses (implant and prosthetic structures) were analyzed. In all models, the highest Pmax stress values were calculated under posterior bilateral loading in cortical bone. The highest von Mises stress levels occured in the posterior implants under posterior bilateral load (260.33 and 219.50 MPa) in the ZL-17 and ZL-30 models, respectively. Under both loads, higher stress levels in prosthetic structures were shown in the ZLS models compared with ZL models. There was no difference between posterior implant angles on stress distribution occurred in implant material and alveolar bone tissue. ZLS and ZL prosthetic structures can be reliably used in maxillary All-on-4 rehabilitation.

摘要

本研究旨在通过三维有限元分析评估不同种植体材料和后牙种植体角度对全口 4 种植体支持式固定上颌义齿的生物力学行为。使用 Rhinoceros 和 VRMesh Studio 程序创建完整无牙上颌模型。在前牙垂直和 17°和 30°后牙种植体角度下,采用 All-on-4 设计定位种植体。使用 3D 扫描仪扫描直型和角度型多单位基台。制作两种不同的修复体上部结构(整体氧化锆框架和锂硅二硅酸酯贴面(ZL)和整体氧化锆增强锂硅(ZLS))。根据修复体结构和后牙种植体角度设计了四个模型。进行后牙双侧垂直加载和前牙斜向加载。分析主要应力(骨组织-Pmax 和 Pmin)和 von Mises 等效应力(种植体和修复体结构)。在所有模型中,皮质骨下后牙双侧加载时计算出的 Pmax 应力值最高。在 ZL-17 和 ZL-30 模型中,后牙双侧加载下后牙种植体的 von Mises 应力水平最高(分别为 260.33 和 219.50 MPa)。在两种载荷下,ZLS 模型的修复体结构的应力水平均高于 ZL 模型。后牙种植体角度对种植体材料和牙槽骨组织的应力分布无影响。ZLS 和 ZL 修复体结构可可靠地用于上颌全口 4 种植体修复。

相似文献

1
Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic materials and posterior implant angles in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite element analysis.三维有限元分析比较全口 4 颗种植体即刻负重治疗概念中不同种植体材料和后牙种植体角度的生物力学差异。
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2022 May 20;67(4):307-315. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2022-0109. Print 2022 Aug 26.
2
Mechanical response of different frameworks for maxillary all-on-four implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: 3D finite element analysis.上颌骨全口种植体支持固定义齿不同支架的机械响应:三维有限元分析。
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2022 Aug 17;67(5):419-428. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2022-0176. Print 2022 Oct 26.
3
Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.通过三维有限元分析比较All-on-4治疗理念中不同种植体倾斜度和悬臂长度的生物力学特性
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Jan/Feb;33(1):64-71. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6201.
4
Biomechanical behavior of implant retained prostheses in the posterior maxilla using different materials: a finite element study.种植体支持的上颌后部修复体不同材料的生物力学行为:有限元研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Apr 15;24(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04142-8.
5
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of two angled narrow-diameter implant designs for an all-on-4 prosthesis.三种不同角度的窄直径种植体设计用于全口 4 颗种植体即刻负重的三维有限元分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Oct;124(4):477-484. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.015. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
6
Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.上颌前部区域不同连接方式、长度和直径种植体生物力学行为的三维有限元分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jan-Feb;31(1):101-10. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4120. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
7
Comparison of Stress Distribution Among Standard Dental Implants Placed in Grafted Bone, Zygomatic Implants, and Subperiosteal Implants in the Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla: 3D Finite Element Analysis.在牙槽骨萎缩的无牙上颌中,标准牙种植体、颧骨种植体和骨膜下种植体的应力分布比较:三维有限元分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2023 Mar-Apr;38(2):347-356. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9987.
8
Effects of all-on-four implant designs in mandible on implants and the surrounding bone: A 3-D finite element analysis.下颌骨全口四颗种植体设计对种植体及周围骨组织的影响:三维有限元分析
Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;23(4):456-463. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_471_19.
9
Evaluation of stresses occurring on three different zirconia dental implants: three-dimensional finite element analysis.三种不同氧化锆牙科种植体的受力评估:三维有限元分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Jan-Feb;25(1):95-103.
10
Effect of Implant Diameter and Bruxism on Biomechanical Performance in Maxillary All-on-4 Treatment: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.种植体直径和磨牙症对上颌 All-on-4 治疗中的生物力学性能的影响:三维有限元分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 Jul-Aug;37(4):709-721. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9419.