Brumer Nadav, Elkins Elizabeth, Hillyer Jake, Hazlewood Chantel, Parbery-Clark Alexandra
Auditory Research Laboratory, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.
College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 28;13:859722. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859722. eCollection 2022.
Previous studies examining the relationship between health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and speech perception ability in cochlear implant (CI) users have yielded variable results, due to a range of factors, such as a variety of different HRQoL questionnaires and CI speech testing materials in addition to CI configuration. In order to decrease inherent variability and better understand the relationship between these measures in CI users, we administered a commonly used clinical CI speech testing battery as well as two popular HRQoL questionnaires in bimodal and bilateral CI users.
The Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI), a modified five-factor version of the GBI (GBI-5F), and the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) were administered to 25 CI users (17 bimodal and 8 bilateral). Speech perception abilities were measured with the AzBio sentence test in several conditions (e.g., quiet and noise, binaural, and first-ear CI only).
Higher performance scores on the GBI general subscore were related to greater binaural speech perception ability in noise. There were no other relationships between the GBI or NCIQ and speech perception ability under any condition. Scores on many of the GBI-5F factors were substantially skewed and asymmetrical; therefore, correlational analyses could not be applied. Across all participants, binaural speech perception scores were greater than first-ear CI only scores.
The GBI general subscore was related to binaural speech perception, which is considered the everyday listening condition of bimodal and bilateral CI users, in noise; while the more CI-specific NCIQ did not relate to speech perception ability in any listening condition. Future research exploring the relationships between the GBI, GBI-5F, and NCIQ considering bimodal and bilateral CI configurations separately is warranted.
以往研究探讨人工耳蜗(CI)使用者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)与言语感知能力之间的关系,结果各异,原因包括一系列因素,如除CI配置外,还有各种不同的HRQoL问卷和CI言语测试材料。为了减少内在变异性并更好地理解CI使用者中这些指标之间的关系,我们对双模式和双侧CI使用者进行了常用的临床CI言语测试组合以及两份常用的HRQoL问卷。
对25名CI使用者(17名双模式和8名双侧)进行了格拉斯哥效益量表(GBI)、GBI的改良五因素版本(GBI - 5F)和奈梅亨人工耳蜗问卷(NCIQ)。在几种条件下(如安静和噪声环境、双耳聆听以及仅使用第一侧耳朵的CI),使用AzBio句子测试来测量言语感知能力。
GBI总体子量表上较高的表现得分与在噪声环境中更强的双耳言语感知能力相关。在任何条件下,GBI或NCIQ与言语感知能力之间均无其他关系。GBI - 5F的许多因素得分严重偏态且不对称;因此,无法进行相关性分析。在所有参与者中,双耳言语感知得分高于仅使用第一侧耳朵的CI得分。
GBI总体子量表与双耳言语感知相关,双耳言语感知被认为是双模式和双侧CI使用者的日常聆听条件,且是在噪声环境中;而更具CI特异性的NCIQ在任何聆听条件下均与言语感知能力无关。有必要开展未来研究,分别考虑双模式和双侧CI配置来探索GBI、GBI - 5F和NCIQ之间的关系。