• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COVID-19 大流行期间乳胶过敏患者的临床和生活质量评估:持续乳胶免疫治疗的可能保护作用。

Clinical and quality of life assessment in patients with latex allergy during COVID-19 pandemic: Possible protective role of continuous latex immunotherapy.

机构信息

18654Allergy Unit of Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2022 Jan-Dec;36:3946320221100367. doi: 10.1177/03946320221100367.

DOI:10.1177/03946320221100367
PMID:35575237
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9111907/
Abstract

During COVID-19 pandemic, the massive use of Personal Protective Equipment could provoke severe adverse reactions in latex allergy patients and could negatively affect their quality of life. Trough a survey the study aimed: (a) to evaluate the incidence of allergic reactions in patients with latex allergy during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic; (b) to evaluate the protective role of continuous latex sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) during this period; and (c) to evaluate quality of life of natural rubber latex allergy (NRLA) patients during the pandemic. 67 patients (9 males and 58 females, mean age of 45.9 ± 11.4 years) suffering from latex allergy were included in the present study. We recorded among our patients 13 cases (34.2%) of urticarial/angioedema (U/A), 9 cases (23.6%) of respiratory symptoms (dyspnoea, shortness of breath and wheezing) and 7 cases (18.4%) of anaphylaxis. In patients who underwent continuous SLIT, we observed less cases of U/A ( < 0.001), respiratory symptoms ( < 0.001), anaphylaxis ( = 0.003), hospitalizations ( = 0.014) and a lower therapy administration. We compared the results of SF-36 questionnaire in patients who underwent continuous and not-continuous SLIT with a significance differences score between these two groups. Our study is the first that investigated the clinical and quality of life effects of COVID-19 pandemic in NRLA patients.

摘要

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,大量使用个人防护设备可能会在乳胶过敏患者中引发严重的不良反应,并可能对他们的生活质量产生负面影响。通过一项调查,本研究旨在:(a)评估 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间乳胶过敏患者的过敏反应发生率;(b)评估在此期间连续乳胶舌下免疫疗法(SLIT)的保护作用;(c)评估天然橡胶乳胶过敏(NRLA)患者在大流行期间的生活质量。本研究纳入了 67 名(9 名男性和 58 名女性,平均年龄 45.9±11.4 岁)乳胶过敏患者。我们记录了我们患者中的 13 例(34.2%)荨麻疹/血管性水肿(U/A)、9 例(23.6%)呼吸道症状(呼吸困难、呼吸急促和喘息)和 7 例(18.4%)过敏反应。在接受连续 SLIT 的患者中,我们观察到较少的 U/A(<0.001)、呼吸道症状(<0.001)、过敏反应(=0.003)、住院(=0.014)和较低的治疗管理。我们比较了接受连续和非连续 SLIT 的患者的 SF-36 问卷结果,两组之间存在显著差异分数。本研究是第一项调查 NRLA 患者在 COVID-19 大流行期间的临床和生活质量影响的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fe8/9112681/69bd72978803/10.1177_03946320221100367-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fe8/9112681/69bd72978803/10.1177_03946320221100367-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fe8/9112681/69bd72978803/10.1177_03946320221100367-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical and quality of life assessment in patients with latex allergy during COVID-19 pandemic: Possible protective role of continuous latex immunotherapy.COVID-19 大流行期间乳胶过敏患者的临床和生活质量评估:持续乳胶免疫治疗的可能保护作用。
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2022 Jan-Dec;36:3946320221100367. doi: 10.1177/03946320221100367.
2
Sublingual immunotherapy with a latex extract in paediatric patients: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.儿童患者舌下含服乳胶提取物免疫疗法:一项双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Aug;22(8):1515-22. doi: 10.1185/030079906X115711.
3
Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of sublingual immunotherapy in patients with latex-induced urticaria: a 12-month study.乳胶诱导性荨麻疹患者舌下免疫疗法的双盲、安慰剂对照研究:一项为期12个月的研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2007 Apr;156(4):674-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07738.x.
4
Tolerance and effects on skin reactivity to latex of sublingual rush immunotherapy with a latex extract.舌下速发型乳胶提取物免疫疗法对乳胶耐受性及皮肤反应性的影响
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2004;14(1):17-25.
5
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of sublingual immunotherapy in natural rubber latex allergic patients.随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验舌下免疫治疗天然橡胶乳胶过敏患者。
Trials. 2011 Aug 9;12:191. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-191.
6
[Failure of sublingual immunotherapy to treat latex allergy. A report of a case].[舌下免疫疗法治疗乳胶过敏失败。1例报告]
Rev Alerg Mex. 2008 Mar-Apr;55(2):76-81.
7
The safety of a novel sublingual rush induction phase for latex desensitization.新型舌下冲击诱导期用于乳胶脱敏的安全性。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Aug;26(8):1855-9. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.490671.
8
Assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on latex glove usage and latex allergy complaints among nurses: A descriptive study.
Work. 2024;78(3):579-589. doi: 10.3233/WOR-230235.
9
[Recommendations for the management of latex allergy in pediatrics].[儿童乳胶过敏管理建议]
Arch Argent Pediatr. 2024 Dec 1;122(6):e202410431. doi: 10.5546/aap.2024-10431. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
10
Anaphylaxis by latex sublingual immunotherapy.
Allergy. 2006 Oct;61(10):1236-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.01155.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Latex Allergy in Children.儿童乳胶过敏
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 25;13(1):124. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010124.

本文引用的文献

1
Occupational hand dermatitis web survey in a university hospital during COVID-19 pandemic: the SHIELD study.新冠疫情期间大学附属医院职业性手部皮炎网络调查:SHIELD 研究。
Med Lav. 2021 Aug 26;112(4):320-326. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v112i4.11670.
2
Latex allergy: advantages of molecular diagnostics during coronavirus.
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2021 May-Jun;35(3):1145-1149. doi: 10.23812/21-09-L.
3
The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic and Lockdown Measures on Quality of Life among Italian General Population.新冠疫情及封锁措施对意大利普通民众生活质量的影响
J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 14;10(2):289. doi: 10.3390/jcm10020289.
4
Latex Allergy: Current Status and Future Perspectives.乳胶过敏:现状与未来展望
J Asthma Allergy. 2020 Sep 28;13:385-398. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S242058. eCollection 2020.
5
The adverse skin reactions of health care workers using personal protective equipment for COVID-19.医护人员使用新冠病毒病个人防护装备时的皮肤不良反应
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 12;99(24):e20603. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020603.
6
Contact urticaria and protein contact dermatitis in the Finnish Register of Occupational Diseases in a period of 12 years.接触性荨麻疹和蛋白接触性皮炎在芬兰职业病登记册中 12 年的发病情况。
Contact Dermatitis. 2020 Jul;83(1):1-7. doi: 10.1111/cod.13547. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
7
A novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) causing pneumonia-associated respiratory syndrome.一种导致肺炎相关呼吸综合征的新型冠状病毒(2019 - 新型冠状病毒)
Cell Mol Immunol. 2020 May;17(5):554. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-0372-4. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
8
Latex immunotherapy: evidence of effectiveness.乳胶免疫疗法:有效性证据。
Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2018 Apr;35(2):145-150. doi: 10.5114/ada.2018.75235. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
9
[Self-reported prevalence of latex allergy and associated factors in healthcare workers].[医护人员中自我报告的乳胶过敏患病率及相关因素]
Rev Alerg Mex. 2017 Oct-Dec;64(4):430-438. doi: 10.29262/ram.v64i4.289.
10
Latex Allergy: Where Are We Now and How Did We Get There?乳胶过敏:我们现在在哪里,我们是如何走到这一步的?
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Sep-Oct;5(5):1212-1216. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.05.029.