Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Chair of Medical Informatics.
Medical Data Integration Center, Dept. for IT and Applied Medical Informatics, University Hospital Tübingen, Translational Bioinformatics, University of Tübingen.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 May 16;292:28-33. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220315.
Many patient portals have been introduced and evaluated in recent years. The results of evaluation studies are difficult to compare, however, as the evaluated patient portal is often not clearly or only incompletely described in the publication. This problem is common to evaluations in health informatics. We evaluated the completeness of descriptions of patient portals in 15 exemplary evaluation publications using the TOPCOP taxonomy. Our results show that core functionalities such as portal design, patient communication, educational features, or system notifications were quite clearly described in all 15 evaluation studies. Other descriptions, such as web accessibility or data management, were often not provided. We conclude that taxonomies such as TOPCOP should be used and even required for describing interventions in evaluation papers.
近年来,已经引入并评估了许多患者门户。然而,评估研究的结果难以进行比较,因为在出版物中,评估的患者门户往往描述得不够清晰或只是不完整。这个问题在健康信息学的评估中很常见。我们使用 TOPCOP 分类法评估了 15 篇有代表性的评估出版物中患者门户描述的完整性。我们的结果表明,门户设计、患者沟通、教育功能或系统通知等核心功能在所有 15 项评估研究中都得到了相当清晰的描述。其他描述,如网络可访问性或数据管理,往往没有提供。我们得出结论,评估论文中应该使用 TOPCOP 等分类法,甚至需要使用。