• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

整合初级保健和儿童癌症生存者照护:范围综述方案。

Integrating primary care and childhood cancer survivorship care: a scoping review protocol.

机构信息

Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 May 16;12(5):e059050. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059050.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059050
PMID:35577464
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9115019/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Improved treatment regimens have led to increased survival rates among childhood cancer survivors (CCS), and more than 84% of all children diagnosed with cancer will experience long-term survival or cure. Survivors are susceptible to late effects of cancer treatment often requiring lifelong follow-up care, as many of these conditions can be prevented or mitigated with surveillance. Integrating primary care (PC) and childhood cancer survivorship care can improve follow-up for survivors, however, little integrative research exists. This scoping review aims to: identify and describe existing models of care that integrate PC and childhood cancer survivorship care, examine the effectiveness of these models of care, and characterise the barriers and facilitators for the integration of PC for CCS.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A comprehensive empirical literature search of three electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase) was employed to identify potentially relevant citations on 1 October 2020. The population, independent variables/intervention, comparator, outcomes, timing, setting and study design/other limiters (PICOTSS) framework was used to inform protocol development. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist and explanation will be used to report study findings. The search strategy will be completed again prior to publication to ensure recent empirical research is accounted for.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This research is exempt from Institutional Review Board (IRB) review. Approval from a research ethics board for this study was not required as it does not involve human participants or unpublished secondary data. The findings from this scoping review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts, clinical conference presentations, professional networks and digital communications using social media platforms such as Twitter. This study has been registered with Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/92xbg.

摘要

简介

儿童癌症幸存者(CCS)的治疗方案有所改进,生存率有所提高,所有被诊断患有癌症的儿童中,超过 84% 的人能够长期生存或治愈。幸存者易受癌症治疗的晚期影响,通常需要终身随访护理,因为许多此类疾病可以通过监测进行预防或缓解。将初级保健(PC)和儿童癌症生存者护理相结合可以改善幸存者的随访,但目前相关整合研究较少。本范围综述旨在:确定和描述将 PC 和儿童癌症生存者护理相结合的现有护理模式,检查这些护理模式的有效性,并描述将 PC 用于 CCS 整合的障碍和促进因素。

方法和分析

2020 年 10 月 1 日,我们对三个电子数据库(PubMed、CINAHL 和 Embase)进行了全面的实证文献检索,以确定可能与本研究相关的参考文献。采用人群、独立变量/干预、比较、结局、时间、地点和研究设计/其他限制(PICOTSS)框架来制定方案。将使用系统评价和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)清单和解释来报告研究结果。在发表前,我们将再次完成搜索策略,以确保纳入最新的实证研究。

伦理和传播

本研究豁免机构审查委员会(IRB)审查。由于本研究不涉及人类参与者或未发表的二次数据,因此不需要研究伦理委员会的批准。本范围综述的结果将通过同行评议的科学论文、临床会议演示、专业网络和数字通信(如使用 Twitter 等社交媒体平台)进行传播。本研究已在开放科学框架(Open Science Framework)上注册:https://osf.io/92xbg。

相似文献

1
Integrating primary care and childhood cancer survivorship care: a scoping review protocol.整合初级保健和儿童癌症生存者照护:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 16;12(5):e059050. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059050.
2
The integration of primary care and childhood cancer survivorship care: a scoping review.初级保健与儿童癌症生存者照护的整合:范围综述。
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Jun;18(3):635-650. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01296-8. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
3
Models of care and associated targeted implementation strategies for cancer survivorship support in Europe: a scoping review protocol.欧洲癌症幸存者支持的照护模式及相关针对性实施策略:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 16;15(2):e085456. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085456.
4
Impact of a cancer diagnosis on the income of adult cancer survivors: a scoping review protocol.癌症诊断对成年癌症幸存者收入的影响:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 16;11(9):e047315. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047315.
5
Interventions to integrate care for people with serious mental illness and substance use disorders: a systematic scoping review protocol.干预措施以整合严重精神疾病和物质使用障碍患者的护理:系统范围界定综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 30;9(10):e031122. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031122.
6
Measuring technology-facilitated sexual violence and abuse: a scoping review protocol of existing measurements.衡量技术助长的性暴力和虐待:现有衡量方法的范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 27;14(12):e089296. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089296.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Harm reduction for perinatal cannabis use: protocol for a scoping review of clinical practices.围产期大麻使用的危害减少:临床实践范围审查方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 10;14(12):e090453. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090453.
9
Assessment of the quality of services of reception with risk classification in obstetrics: a scoping review protocol.评估具有风险分类的产科接待服务质量:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 12;13(4):e066009. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066009.
10
An investigation of cultural influences in survivors of paediatric cancer: a systematic review protocol.儿童癌症幸存者的文化影响调查:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 22;12(11):e062452. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062452.

本文引用的文献

1
Transition from pediatric to adult follow-up care in childhood cancer survivors-a systematic review.儿童癌症幸存者从儿科到成人随访护理的过渡:系统评价。
J Cancer Surviv. 2021 Feb;15(1):151-162. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00920-9. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
2
Late mortality and chronic health conditions in long-term survivors of early-adolescent and young adult cancers: a retrospective cohort analysis from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.青少年期和青年期癌症长期幸存者的晚期死亡率和慢性健康状况:来自儿童癌症幸存者研究的回顾性队列分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Mar;21(3):421-435. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30800-9. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
3
Cancer statistics, 2020.癌症统计数据,2020 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
4
Life Expectancy of Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer Over 3 Decades.成年儿童癌症幸存者的预期寿命超过 3 个十年。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Mar 1;6(3):350-357. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.5582.
5
Primary Care Providers' Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs, and Practices Regarding Their Preparedness to Provide Cancer Survivorship Care.初级保健提供者对提供癌症生存者护理的准备情况的知识、态度、信念和实践。
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Dec;35(6):1219-1226. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01585-4.
6
The involvement of primary care physicians in care for childhood cancer survivors.初级保健医生参与儿童癌症幸存者的照护。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019 Aug;66(8):e27774. doi: 10.1002/pbc.27774. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
7
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.系统评价或范围综述?在选择系统评价或范围综述方法时,作者的指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
8
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
9
A mixed-methods analysis of the capacity of the Patient-Centered Medical Home to implement care coordination services for cancer survivors.一项混合方法分析,评估以患者为中心的医疗之家为癌症幸存者实施护理协调服务的能力。
Transl Behav Med. 2018 May 23;8(3):319-327. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx059.
10
Integrating primary care providers in the care of cancer survivors: gaps in evidence and future opportunities.将初级保健提供者纳入癌症幸存者护理:证据差距与未来机遇
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jan;18(1):e30-e38. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30570-8.