Victorian Paediatric Palliative Care Program, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2022 May 16;12(5):e060077. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060077.
Advance care planning (ACP) helps families and paediatricians prepare and plan for end-of-life decision-making. However, there remains inconsistency in its practice with the limited literature describing what this preparation involves, and whether paediatricians recognise a difference between the process of ACP and its outcomes, such as resuscitation plans. This study aims to understand how paediatricians conceptualise ACP when caring for children with life-limiting conditions (LLC) who are unable to participate in decision-making for his/herself.
Individual, semistructured, vignette-based qualitative interviews.
Acute inpatient and long-term outpatient paediatric care in three secondary and two tertiary centres in Victoria, Australia.
25 purposively sampled paediatricians who treat children with LLC, outside the neonatal period. Paediatricians were excluded if they worked within specialist palliative care teams or assisted in this study's design.
Four key themes were identified when approaching end-of-life decision-making discussions: (1) there is a process over time, (2) there are three elements, (3) the role of exploring parental values and (4) the emotional impact. The three elements of this process are: (1) communicating the child's risk of death, (2) moving from theoretical concepts to practice and (3) documenting decisions about resuscitation or intensive technologies. However, not all paediatricians recognised all elements as ACP, nor are all elements consistently or intentionally used. Some paediatricians considered ACP to be only documentation of decisions in advance.
There is a preparatory process of discussions for end-of-life decision-making, with elements in this preparation practised within therapeutic relationships. Complexity in what constitutes ACP needs to be captured in guidance and training to include intentional exploration of parental values, and recognition and management of the emotional impact of ACP could increase its consistency and value.
预先医疗照护计划(advance care planning,ACP)有助于家属和儿科医生为临终决策做准备和计划。然而,在实践中,其做法并不一致,相关文献也有限,无法描述这种准备工作具体涉及哪些内容,以及儿科医生是否能够认识到 ACP 过程与其结果(如复苏计划)之间的区别。本研究旨在了解当照顾无法为自己做出决策的患有生命末期疾病(life-limiting conditions,LLC)的儿童时,儿科医生如何理解 ACP。
个体、半结构式、基于案例的定性访谈。
澳大利亚维多利亚州的三个二级和两个三级中心的急性住院和长期门诊儿科护理。
25 名经专门挑选的、治疗 LLC 儿童的儿科医生,且他们不在新生儿期工作。如果儿科医生在专门的姑息治疗团队工作或协助本研究的设计,则将其排除在外。
在进行临终决策讨论时,确定了四个关键主题:(1)这是一个随时间推移的过程,(2)有三个要素,(3)探索父母价值观的作用,(4)情绪影响。这个过程的三个要素是:(1)沟通儿童死亡的风险,(2)将理论概念转化为实践,以及(3)记录关于复苏或强化治疗的决策。然而,并非所有儿科医生都将所有要素都视为 ACP,也并非所有要素都始终或有意使用。一些儿科医生认为 ACP 仅是预先做出决策的记录。
存在一个针对临终决策的讨论准备过程,该过程的要素在治疗关系中得到实践。需要在指导和培训中捕捉到 ACP 的构成要素的复杂性,包括对父母价值观的有意探索,以及认识和管理 ACP 的情绪影响,这可以提高其一致性和价值。