School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia.
Centre for Learning & Research in Palliative Care, HammondCare, Sydney, Australia.
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Mar 6;18(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0411-z.
Advance care planning (ACP) can offer benefits to patients and their families, especially when delivered in outpatient settings, but uptake remains low. Common barriers for health professionals include a perceived lack of time and adequate training, experience, and confidence in conducting ACP. Patient-reported barriers include a lack of awareness of ACP or discomfort initiating or engaging in discussions about end-of-life.
We aimed to explore patients' perspectives of an ACP intervention designed to address common barriers to uptake in the general practice setting. We provided training and support to doctors and general practice nurses (GPNs) to initiate and lead ACP discussions at their respective practices (2014 to 2015). Following the intervention, we conducted interviews with patients to explore their experience of engaging in ACP in the general practice setting. Thematic analysis was used to inductively code transcripts and identify key themes from semi-structured interviews with patients.
Six major themes relating to patient experiences of GPN-facilitated ACP were identified: working through ideas, therapeutic relationship with nurses, significance of making wishes known, protecting family from burden, autonomy in decision-making, and challenges of family communication. The patients valued the opportunity to speak about issues that are important to them with the GPN who they found to be compassionate and caring. The patients felt that ACP would lead to significant benefits not only to themselves but also for their family. Despite encouragement to involve other family members, most patients attended the ACP discussions alone or as a couple; many did not see the relevance of their family being involved in the discussions. Some patients felt uncomfortable or reluctant in communicating the results of their discussion with their family.
With adequate training and support, GPNs are able to initiate and facilitate ACP conversations with patients. Their involvement in ACP can have significant benefits for patients. Psychosocial and relational elements of care are critical to patient satisfaction. Our findings show that some patients may feel uncomfortable or reluctant to communicate the results of their ACP discussions with their family. A future larger study is required to verify the findings of this pilot study.
预先医疗照护计划(ACP)可为患者及其家属带来益处,特别是在门诊环境下实施时,但接受度仍然较低。卫生专业人员常见的障碍包括认为缺乏时间、培训以及在实施 ACP 方面的经验和信心。患者报告的障碍包括对 ACP 的认识不足或不愿开始或参与有关临终问题的讨论。
我们旨在探讨患者对 ACP 干预措施的看法,该措施旨在解决一般实践环境中接受 ACP 的常见障碍。我们为医生和全科护士(GPN)提供培训和支持,以在各自的实践中启动和主导 ACP 讨论(2014 年至 2015 年)。干预措施后,我们对患者进行了访谈,以探讨他们在一般实践环境中参与 ACP 的体验。使用主题分析对患者的半结构化访谈记录进行归纳编码,并确定主要主题。
确定了与 GPN 协助 ACP 相关的患者体验的六个主要主题:想法的交流、与护士的治疗关系、表达意愿的重要性、保护家庭免受负担、决策的自主性以及家庭沟通的挑战。患者非常重视与他们认为富有同情心和关爱的 GPN 谈论对他们重要的问题。患者认为 ACP 不仅对自己,而且对他们的家人也会带来重大利益。尽管鼓励患者让其他家庭成员参与,但大多数患者独自或作为夫妻参加 ACP 讨论;许多患者认为他们的家人参与讨论并不相关。一些患者在与家人沟通讨论结果时感到不舒服或不愿意。
经过适当的培训和支持,GPN 能够与患者启动和促进 ACP 对话。他们参与 ACP 可以为患者带来重大利益。护理的心理社会和关系要素对患者满意度至关重要。我们的研究结果表明,一些患者可能会感到不舒服或不愿意与家人沟通 ACP 讨论的结果。需要进一步的大型研究来验证这项初步研究的结果。