Suppr超能文献

住院成瘾筛查和干预对再入院的影响。

The effect of inpatient addiction screening and intervention on readmissions.

机构信息

Center for Nursing Innovation and Research, Morristown Medical Center, United States of America.

Behavioral Health Department, Morristown Medical Center, United States of America.

出版信息

Appl Nurs Res. 2022 Jun;65:151573. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2022.151573. Epub 2022 Mar 19.

Abstract

AIM

The number of individuals in the United States (US) needing treatment for substance use disorder (SUD) but not receiving treatment at a specialty facility was reported to be almost 18 million in 2019. This study measured the difference in subsequent hospital visits between groups, one receiving screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) and one receiving usual care.

BACKGROUND

There are studies that discuss SBIRT in terms of process evaluation, staff training, reduced readmission rates, and self-reported reductions in substance use. However, the interrelationship between components of SBIRT implementation, such as feasibility, cost, and sustainability need additional investigation. This study compared readmissions between groups receiving SBIRT counseling (n = 101) and those receiving usual care (n = 99).

RESULTS

The overall total number of subsequent visits for SUD for the group receiving SBIRT (53) was significantly lower than for the group receiving usual care (128). The overall total number of non-SUD subsequent visits was not significantly different between groups. The study also identified differences between sexes that require further investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study demonstrate a measure of difference based on SBIRT intervention. The SBIRT program can be incorporated into daily practice in the acute care setting through nursing education and utilization of the electronic health platform.

摘要

目的

据报道,2019 年美国(US)有近 1800 万人需要接受物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗,但未在专业机构接受治疗。本研究旨在衡量接受筛查、简短干预和转介治疗(SBIRT)的组与接受常规护理的组之间随后的医院就诊次数的差异。

背景

有研究讨论了 SBIRT 在流程评估、员工培训、降低再入院率和自我报告的物质使用减少方面的情况。然而,SBIRT 实施的各个组成部分(如可行性、成本和可持续性)之间的相互关系需要进一步调查。本研究比较了接受 SBIRT 咨询的组(n=101)和接受常规护理的组(n=99)之间的再入院情况。

结果

接受 SBIRT 治疗的组(53 次)随后因 SUD 就诊的总次数明显低于接受常规护理的组(128 次)。两组随后非 SUD 就诊的总次数没有显著差异。研究还发现了性别差异,需要进一步调查。

结论

本研究的结果表明,SBIRT 干预措施可以衡量差异。SBIRT 方案可以通过护理教育和利用电子健康平台纳入急性护理环境中的日常实践。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验