Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3053, Australia
Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3053, Australia.
J Neurosci. 2022 Jun 22;42(25):5047-5057. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2181-21.2022. Epub 2022 May 16.
Safety learning generates associative links between neutral stimuli and the absence of threat, promoting the inhibition of fear and security-seeking behaviors. Precisely how safety learning is mediated at the level of underlying brain systems, particularly in humans, remains unclear. Here, we integrated a novel Pavlovian conditioned inhibition task with ultra-high field (7 Tesla) fMRI to examine the neural basis of safety learning in 49 healthy participants. In our task, participants were conditioned to two safety signals: a conditioned inhibitor that predicted threat omission when paired with a known threat signal (A+/AX-), and a standard safety signal that generally predicted threat omission (BC-). Both safety signals evoked equivalent autonomic and subjective learning responses but diverged strongly in terms of underlying brain activation ( whole-brain corrected). The conditioned inhibitor was characterized by more prominent activation of the dorsal striatum, anterior insular, and dorsolateral PFC compared with the standard safety signal, whereas the latter evoked greater activation of the ventromedial PFC, posterior cingulate, and hippocampus, among other regions. Further analyses of the conditioned inhibitor indicated that its initial learning was characterized by consistent engagement of dorsal striatal, midbrain, thalamic, premotor, and prefrontal subregions. These findings suggest that safety learning via conditioned inhibition involves a distributed cortico-striatal circuitry, separable from broader cortical regions involved with processing standard safety signals (e.g., CS). This cortico-striatal system could represent a novel neural substrate of safety learning, underlying the initial generation of "stimulus-safety" associations, distinct from wider cortical correlates of safety processing, which facilitate the behavioral outcomes of learning. Identifying safety is critical for maintaining adaptive levels of anxiety, but the neural mechanisms of human safety learning remain unclear. Using 7 Tesla fMRI, we compared learning-related brain activity for a conditioned inhibitor, which actively predicted threat omission, and a standard safety signal (CS), which was passively unpaired with threat. The inhibitor engaged an extended circuitry primarily featuring the dorsal striatum, along with thalamic, midbrain, and premotor/PFC regions. The CS exclusively involved cortical safety-related regions observed in basic safety conditioning, such as the vmPFC. These findings extend current models to include learning-specific mechanisms for encoding stimulus-safety associations, which might be distinguished from expression-related cortical mechanisms. These insights may suggest novel avenues for targeting dysfunctional safety learning in psychopathology.
安全学习在中性刺激和无威胁之间产生联想联系,促进了恐惧的抑制和寻求安全的行为。确切地说,安全学习在潜在的大脑系统水平上是如何被介导的,特别是在人类中,仍然不清楚。在这里,我们结合了一种新的条件性抑制任务和超高场(7 特斯拉) fMRI,以检查 49 名健康参与者中安全学习的神经基础。在我们的任务中,参与者被条件化到两种安全信号:一种条件性抑制剂,当与已知的威胁信号(A+/AX-)配对时,预测威胁的缺失,另一种标准安全信号,通常预测威胁的缺失(BC-)。两种安全信号都引起了相当的自主和主观学习反应,但在潜在的大脑激活方面存在很大差异(全脑校正)。条件抑制剂的特征是与标准安全信号相比,背侧纹状体、前岛叶和背外侧前额叶的激活更为显著,而后者则引起了腹内侧前额叶、后扣带回和海马等区域的更大激活。对条件抑制剂的进一步分析表明,其初始学习的特征是背侧纹状体、中脑、丘脑、运动前和前额叶亚区的一致参与。这些发现表明,通过条件性抑制的安全学习涉及到一个分布式的皮质-纹状体电路,与处理标准安全信号(如 CS)的更广泛的皮质区域分离。这个皮质-纹状体系统可能代表了安全学习的一个新的神经基质,是“刺激-安全”关联的初始产生的基础,与安全处理的更广泛的皮质相关物不同,后者促进了学习的行为结果。识别安全对于维持适应性的焦虑水平是至关重要的,但人类安全学习的神经机制仍不清楚。使用 7 特斯拉 fMRI,我们比较了条件性抑制剂(主动预测威胁缺失)和标准安全信号(CS)的学习相关大脑活动,CS 与威胁被动地未配对。抑制剂参与了一个扩展的电路,主要由背侧纹状体以及丘脑、中脑和运动前/前额叶区域组成。CS 仅涉及到基本安全条件反射中观察到的皮质安全相关区域,如 vmPFC。这些发现将当前的模型扩展到包括用于编码刺激-安全关联的学习特异性机制,这些机制可能与表达相关的皮质机制区分开来。这些见解可能为靶向精神病理学中的功能失调的安全学习提供新的途径。