• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cortico-Striatal Activity Characterizes Human Safety Learning via Pavlovian Conditioned Inhibition.皮质纹状体活动通过条件性 Pavlovian 抑制来表征人类的安全学习。
J Neurosci. 2022 Jun 22;42(25):5047-5057. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2181-21.2022. Epub 2022 May 16.
2
Clarifying the neural substrates of threat and safety reversal learning in humans.阐明人类威胁和安全反转学习的神经基质。
Neuroimage. 2020 Feb 15;207:116427. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116427. Epub 2019 Dec 1.
3
Revaluing the Role of vmPFC in the Acquisition of Pavlovian Threat Conditioning in Humans.重新评估 vmPFC 在人类条件性恐惧反应获得中的作用。
J Neurosci. 2020 Oct 28;40(44):8491-8500. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0304-20.2020. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
4
Neural mediators of subjective and autonomic responding during threat learning and regulation.威胁学习和调节过程中的主观和自主反应的神经介质。
Neuroimage. 2021 Dec 15;245:118643. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118643. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
5
Neural mechanisms underlying the conditioned diminution of the unconditioned fear response.条件性减弱无条件恐惧反应的神经机制。
Neuroimage. 2012 Mar;60(1):787-99. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.048. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
6
Effects of Experiencing CS-US Pairings on Instructed Fear Reversal.体验条件性刺激-非条件刺激配对对指令性恐惧反转的影响。
J Neurosci. 2023 Jul 26;43(30):5546-5558. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0665-22.2023. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
7
Active Avoidance: Neural Mechanisms and Attenuation of Pavlovian Conditioned Responding.主动回避:神经机制与巴甫洛夫条件反应的减弱
J Neurosci. 2017 May 3;37(18):4808-4818. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3261-16.2017. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
8
Neural mechanisms of human temporal fear conditioning.人类颞叶恐惧条件反射的神经机制。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2016 Dec;136:97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2016.09.019. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
9
Temporal dynamics of fMRI signal changes during conditioned interoceptive pain-related fear and safety acquisition and extinction.条件性内脏痛相关恐惧和安全获得及消退期间 fMRI 信号变化的时程动态。
Behav Brain Res. 2022 Jun 3;427:113868. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2022.113868. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
10
Response to learned threat: An FMRI study in adolescent and adult anxiety.回应有学问的威胁:青少年和成人焦虑的 fMRI 研究。
Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Oct;170(10):1195-204. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12050651.

引用本文的文献

1
Subregions in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex integrate threat and protective information to meta-represent safety.腹内侧前额叶皮质的亚区域整合威胁和保护信息以元表征安全性。
PLoS Biol. 2025 Jan 13;23(1):e3002986. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002986. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Event Segmentation Promotes the Reorganization of Emotional Memory.事件分割促进情绪记忆的重组。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2025 Jan 2;37(1):110-134. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02244.
3
Pavlovian safety learning: An integrative theoretical review.巴甫洛夫式安全学习:一项综合性理论综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb;32(1):176-202. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02559-4. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
4
Adaptive Safety Coding in the Prefrontal Cortex.前额叶皮质中的适应性安全编码
bioRxiv. 2024 Jul 23:2024.07.19.604228. doi: 10.1101/2024.07.19.604228.
5
Translational approaches to the neurobiological study of conditional discrimination and inhibition: Implications for psychiatric disease.条件辨别和抑制的神经生物学研究的转化方法:对精神疾病的影响。
Behav Neurosci. 2024 Aug;138(4):244-259. doi: 10.1037/bne0000594. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
6
Disease-specific alterations in central fear network engagement during acquisition and extinction of conditioned interoceptive fear in inflammatory bowel disease.炎症性肠病条件性内脏恐惧获得和消退过程中中枢恐惧网络参与的疾病特异性改变。
Mol Psychiatry. 2024 Nov;29(11):3527-3536. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02612-7. Epub 2024 May 27.
7
Hippocampal Involvement in Safety Signal Learning Varies With Anxiety Among Healthy Adults.海马体在安全信号学习中的参与程度因健康成年人的焦虑水平而异。
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2023 Jun 8;4(1):155-164. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2023.05.007. eCollection 2024 Jan.
8
Pattern separation of fear extinction memory.恐惧消退记忆的模式分离。
Learn Mem. 2023 Jul 11;30(5-6):110-115. doi: 10.1101/lm.053760.123. Print 2023 May-Jun.
9
Neural circuitry involved in conditioned inhibition via safety signal learning is sensitive to trauma exposure.通过安全信号学习参与条件性抑制的神经回路对创伤暴露敏感。
Neurobiol Stress. 2022 Oct 17;21:100497. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2022.100497. eCollection 2022 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Meta-analysis of human prediction error for incentives, perception, cognition, and action.人类激励、感知、认知和行动预测误差的荟萃分析。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022 Jun;47(7):1339-1349. doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01264-3. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
2
Does the human ventromedial prefrontal cortex support fear learning, fear extinction or both? A commentary on subregional contributions.人类腹内侧前额叶皮层支持恐惧学习、恐惧消退还是两者皆支持?关于亚区域贡献的评论
Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;27(2):784-786. doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01326-4. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
3
Prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and threat processing: implications for PTSD.前额皮质、杏仁核和威胁处理:对 PTSD 的影响。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022 Jan;47(1):247-259. doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01155-7. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
4
Dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core signals perceived saliency.伏隔核核心中的多巴胺释放信号表示感知显著性。
Curr Biol. 2021 Nov 8;31(21):4748-4761.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.08.052. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
5
L-DOPA modulates activity in the vmPFC, nucleus accumbens, and VTA during threat extinction learning in humans.L-DOPA 调节人类在威胁消退学习过程中 vmPFC、伏隔核和 VTA 的活动。
Elife. 2021 Sep 2;10:e65280. doi: 10.7554/eLife.65280.
6
Learning safety to reduce fear: Recent insights and potential implications.学习安全以减少恐惧:近期见解与潜在影响
Behav Brain Res. 2021 Aug 6;411:113402. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113402. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
7
Safety learning and the Pavlovian conditioned inhibition of fear in humans: Current state and future directions.人类的安全学习和巴甫洛夫条件恐惧抑制:现状和未来方向。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Aug;127:659-674. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.05.014. Epub 2021 May 21.
8
Safety learning during development: Implications for development of psychopathology.安全学习的发展过程:对精神病理学发展的影响。
Behav Brain Res. 2021 Jun 25;408:113297. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113297. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
9
The Reward System and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: Does Trauma Affect the Way We Interact With Positive Stimuli?奖励系统与创伤后应激障碍:创伤会影响我们与积极刺激的互动方式吗?
Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks). 2021 Feb 25;5:2470547021996006. doi: 10.1177/2470547021996006. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
10
The Neural Correlates of Cued Reward Omission.线索性奖励缺失的神经关联
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Feb 11;15:615313. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.615313. eCollection 2021.

皮质纹状体活动通过条件性 Pavlovian 抑制来表征人类的安全学习。

Cortico-Striatal Activity Characterizes Human Safety Learning via Pavlovian Conditioned Inhibition.

机构信息

Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3053, Australia

Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3053, Australia.

出版信息

J Neurosci. 2022 Jun 22;42(25):5047-5057. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2181-21.2022. Epub 2022 May 16.

DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2181-21.2022
PMID:35577553
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9233447/
Abstract

Safety learning generates associative links between neutral stimuli and the absence of threat, promoting the inhibition of fear and security-seeking behaviors. Precisely how safety learning is mediated at the level of underlying brain systems, particularly in humans, remains unclear. Here, we integrated a novel Pavlovian conditioned inhibition task with ultra-high field (7 Tesla) fMRI to examine the neural basis of safety learning in 49 healthy participants. In our task, participants were conditioned to two safety signals: a conditioned inhibitor that predicted threat omission when paired with a known threat signal (A+/AX-), and a standard safety signal that generally predicted threat omission (BC-). Both safety signals evoked equivalent autonomic and subjective learning responses but diverged strongly in terms of underlying brain activation ( whole-brain corrected). The conditioned inhibitor was characterized by more prominent activation of the dorsal striatum, anterior insular, and dorsolateral PFC compared with the standard safety signal, whereas the latter evoked greater activation of the ventromedial PFC, posterior cingulate, and hippocampus, among other regions. Further analyses of the conditioned inhibitor indicated that its initial learning was characterized by consistent engagement of dorsal striatal, midbrain, thalamic, premotor, and prefrontal subregions. These findings suggest that safety learning via conditioned inhibition involves a distributed cortico-striatal circuitry, separable from broader cortical regions involved with processing standard safety signals (e.g., CS). This cortico-striatal system could represent a novel neural substrate of safety learning, underlying the initial generation of "stimulus-safety" associations, distinct from wider cortical correlates of safety processing, which facilitate the behavioral outcomes of learning. Identifying safety is critical for maintaining adaptive levels of anxiety, but the neural mechanisms of human safety learning remain unclear. Using 7 Tesla fMRI, we compared learning-related brain activity for a conditioned inhibitor, which actively predicted threat omission, and a standard safety signal (CS), which was passively unpaired with threat. The inhibitor engaged an extended circuitry primarily featuring the dorsal striatum, along with thalamic, midbrain, and premotor/PFC regions. The CS exclusively involved cortical safety-related regions observed in basic safety conditioning, such as the vmPFC. These findings extend current models to include learning-specific mechanisms for encoding stimulus-safety associations, which might be distinguished from expression-related cortical mechanisms. These insights may suggest novel avenues for targeting dysfunctional safety learning in psychopathology.

摘要

安全学习在中性刺激和无威胁之间产生联想联系,促进了恐惧的抑制和寻求安全的行为。确切地说,安全学习在潜在的大脑系统水平上是如何被介导的,特别是在人类中,仍然不清楚。在这里,我们结合了一种新的条件性抑制任务和超高场(7 特斯拉) fMRI,以检查 49 名健康参与者中安全学习的神经基础。在我们的任务中,参与者被条件化到两种安全信号:一种条件性抑制剂,当与已知的威胁信号(A+/AX-)配对时,预测威胁的缺失,另一种标准安全信号,通常预测威胁的缺失(BC-)。两种安全信号都引起了相当的自主和主观学习反应,但在潜在的大脑激活方面存在很大差异(全脑校正)。条件抑制剂的特征是与标准安全信号相比,背侧纹状体、前岛叶和背外侧前额叶的激活更为显著,而后者则引起了腹内侧前额叶、后扣带回和海马等区域的更大激活。对条件抑制剂的进一步分析表明,其初始学习的特征是背侧纹状体、中脑、丘脑、运动前和前额叶亚区的一致参与。这些发现表明,通过条件性抑制的安全学习涉及到一个分布式的皮质-纹状体电路,与处理标准安全信号(如 CS)的更广泛的皮质区域分离。这个皮质-纹状体系统可能代表了安全学习的一个新的神经基质,是“刺激-安全”关联的初始产生的基础,与安全处理的更广泛的皮质相关物不同,后者促进了学习的行为结果。识别安全对于维持适应性的焦虑水平是至关重要的,但人类安全学习的神经机制仍不清楚。使用 7 特斯拉 fMRI,我们比较了条件性抑制剂(主动预测威胁缺失)和标准安全信号(CS)的学习相关大脑活动,CS 与威胁被动地未配对。抑制剂参与了一个扩展的电路,主要由背侧纹状体以及丘脑、中脑和运动前/前额叶区域组成。CS 仅涉及到基本安全条件反射中观察到的皮质安全相关区域,如 vmPFC。这些发现将当前的模型扩展到包括用于编码刺激-安全关联的学习特异性机制,这些机制可能与表达相关的皮质机制区分开来。这些见解可能为靶向精神病理学中的功能失调的安全学习提供新的途径。