Department of Pharmacy, Lakeland Regional Health, 1324 Lakeland Hills Blvd, Lakeland, FL 33805, United States of America.
Department of Pharmacy, Lakeland Regional Health, 1324 Lakeland Hills Blvd, Lakeland, FL 33805, United States of America.
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Jul;57:149-152. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.04.044. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
Patients experiencing an intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) on oral anticoagulants often require rapid reversal. This study evaluated patients taking factor Xa inhibitors or warfarin that received reversal with 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) for an ICH. The objective of the study was to determine if the efficacy of 4F-PCC for the reversal of factor Xa inhibitors is noninferior to its use in warfarin reversal in patients with ICH.
This was a retrospective, single center, noninferiority trial. Patients presenting to the emergency department with ICH were divided into two cohorts: those taking factor Xa inhibitors versus those taking warfarin. In each cohort, patients received anticoagulation reversal with weight-based 4F-PCC. The primary endpoint was hemostatic efficacy defined as ≤20% expansion in hematoma volume on repeat computed tomography imaging. A pre-specified noninferiority margin of -10% was selected to evaluate the difference between groups for the primary endpoint.
A total of 221 patients were included in the study (factor Xa inhibitors, n = 87; warfarin, n = 134). Effective hemostasis was achieved in 70 patients (81%) on factor Xa inhibitors compared to 111 patients (83%) on warfarin, (-2.4% difference, [95% confidence interval, -12.87 to 8.12]; p = 0.654). There was no statistically significant difference between groups with regards to the primary outcome; however, the use of 4F-PCC in factor Xa inhibitor reversal was not noninferior when compared to 4F-PCC use for warfarin reversal. Hospital length of stay and discharge disposition were similar between cohorts.
The efficacy of 4F-PCC in reversing factor Xa inhibitor-related ICH compared to warfarin-related ICH was not significantly different between groups; however, these results did not prove noninferiority. Further study is warranted to delineate 4F-PCC's role in reversing factor Xa inhibitors in patients with ICH.
接受口服抗凝剂治疗的颅内出血(ICH)患者常需要快速逆转抗凝。本研究评估了接受凝血因子 Xa 抑制剂或华法林治疗的 ICH 患者接受 4 因子凝血酶原复合物浓缩物(4F-PCC)逆转治疗的效果。本研究的目的是确定凝血因子 Xa 抑制剂逆转治疗中使用 4F-PCC 的效果是否不劣于华法林逆转治疗。
这是一项回顾性、单中心、非劣效性试验。因 ICH 就诊于急诊科的患者被分为两组:接受凝血因子 Xa 抑制剂治疗的患者和接受华法林治疗的患者。在每组中,患者均根据体重接受抗凝逆转治疗,给予基于体重的 4F-PCC。主要终点是止血效果,定义为重复计算机断层扫描成像显示血肿体积扩张≤20%。为评估主要终点两组间的差异,选择了一个预先指定的非劣效性边界为-10%。
共有 221 例患者纳入本研究(凝血因子 Xa 抑制剂组,n=87;华法林组,n=134)。凝血因子 Xa 抑制剂组有 70 例(81%)患者达到有效止血,而华法林组有 111 例(83%)患者达到有效止血,两组间差异为-2.4%([95%置信区间,-12.87 至 8.12];p=0.654)。两组在主要结局方面无统计学差异,但与华法林逆转治疗相比,凝血因子 Xa 抑制剂逆转治疗中使用 4F-PCC 并不具有非劣效性。两组的住院时间和出院去向相似。
与华法林相关 ICH 相比,4F-PCC 逆转凝血因子 Xa 抑制剂相关 ICH 的效果在两组间无显著差异;然而,这些结果并未证明非劣效性。需要进一步研究来阐明 4F-PCC 在治疗 ICH 患者凝血因子 Xa 抑制剂逆转中的作用。