Fewster Kayla M, Zehr Jackie D, Gooyers Chad E, Parkinson Robert J, Callaghan Jack P
Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON,Canada.
30 Forensic Engineering, Toronto, ON,Canada.
J Appl Biomech. 2022 May 17;38(3):155-163. doi: 10.1123/jab.2021-0189. Print 2022 Jun 1.
Recent work has demonstrated that low back pain is a common complaint following low-speed collisions. Despite frequent pain reporting, no studies involving human volunteers have been completed to examine the exposures in the lumbar spine during low-speed rear impact collisions.
Twenty-four participants were recruited and a custom-built crash sled simulated rear impact collisions, with a change in velocity of 8 km/h. Randomized collisions were completed with and without lumbar support. Inverse dynamics analyses were conducted, and outputs were used to generate estimates of peak L4/L5 joint compression and shear.
Average (SD) peak L4/L5 compression and shear reaction forces were not significantly different without lumbar support (compression = 498.22 N [178.0 N]; shear = 302.2 N [98.5 N]) compared to with lumbar support (compression = 484.5 N [151.1 N]; shear = 291.3 N [176.8 N]). Lumbar flexion angle at the time of peak shear was 36° (12°) without and 33° (11°) with lumbar support.
Overall, the estimated reaction forces were 14% and 30% of existing National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health occupational exposure limits for compression and shear during repeated lifting, respectively. Findings also demonstrate that, during a laboratory collision simulation, lumbar support does not significantly influence the total estimated L4/L5 joint reaction force.
近期研究表明,下背痛是低速碰撞后常见的主诉。尽管疼痛报告频繁,但尚未有涉及人类志愿者的研究来检查低速后碰撞时腰椎的受力情况。
招募了24名参与者,使用定制的碰撞雪橇模拟后碰撞,速度变化为8公里/小时。在有和没有腰部支撑的情况下完成随机碰撞。进行了逆动力学分析,并使用输出结果生成L4/L5关节峰值压缩和剪切力的估计值。
与有腰部支撑时(压缩力=484.5牛[151.1牛];剪切力=291.3牛[176.8牛])相比,没有腰部支撑时L4/L5的平均(标准差)峰值压缩和剪切反作用力无显著差异(压缩力=498.22牛[178.0牛];剪切力=302.2牛[98.5牛])。峰值剪切力出现时的腰椎前屈角度,没有腰部支撑时为36°(12°),有腰部支撑时为33°(11°)。
总体而言,估计的反作用力分别为美国国家职业安全与健康研究所规定的重复举升时压缩和剪切职业暴露限值的14%和30%。研究结果还表明,在实验室碰撞模拟中,腰部支撑对估计的L4/L5关节总反作用力没有显著影响。