Yu Xin, Chu Xiangling, Wu Yan, Zhou Juan, Zhao Jing, Zhou Fei, Han Chaonan, Su Chunxia
Authors contributed equally.
Department of Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital & Thoracic Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200433, China.
Cancer Drug Resist. 2021 May 24;4(3):728-739. doi: 10.20517/cdr.2021.28. eCollection 2021.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically changed the treatment paradigm in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, progression patterns with immunotherapy are currently unclear and therapeutic options beyond resistance remain challenging. We reviewed advanced NSCLC patients between January 2016 and December 2019 who were treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in our center and identified those who developed disease progression. Later-line treatment strategies were collected and objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Of the 118 patients, 46 (39.0%) showed oligoprogression and 72 (61.0%) showed systemic progression. No difference in progression patterns was observed between monotherapy and combination therapy. Systemic progression was strongly associated with never-smokers (51.4% 21.7%, = 0.001) and ECOG PS = 2 (13.9% 2.2%, = 0.048) at baseline. The distribution of progression sites was roughly similar between oligoprogression and systemic progression, and the most commonly affected anatomic site was lung (66.9%), followed by bone (12.7%) and lymph nodes (11.0%). For patients beyond first disease progression, checkpoint inhibitor-based combinations could lead to a significantly longer PFS2 compared with ICIs monotherapy (9.63 months 4.23 months, = 0.004, HR = 0.394, 95%CI: 0.174-0.893) and other therapy (9.63 months 4.07 months, = 0.046, HR = 0.565, 95%CI: 0.326-0.980). Median OS of the ICIs combination group was not reached but was significantly longer than other therapy group (NR 14.37 months, = 0.010, HR = 0.332, 95%CI: 0.167-0.661). Systemic progression occurs more frequently among NSCLC patients receiving ICIs. Checkpoint inhibitor-based combinations show favorable outcomes as subsequent treatment strategies after the failure of previous ICIs treatment.
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)显著改变了非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的治疗模式。然而,目前免疫治疗的进展模式尚不清楚,且耐药后的治疗选择仍具有挑战性。我们回顾了2016年1月至2019年12月在本中心接受抗PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂治疗的晚期NSCLC患者,并确定了出现疾病进展的患者。收集了后续治疗策略,并评估了客观缓解率、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。118例患者中,46例(39.0%)表现为寡进展,72例(61.0%)表现为全身进展。单药治疗和联合治疗之间在进展模式上未观察到差异。全身进展与基线时从不吸烟者(51.4%对21.7%,P = 0.001)和东部肿瘤协作组体能状态(ECOG PS)=2(13.9%对2.2%,P = 0.048)密切相关。寡进展和全身进展之间进展部位的分布大致相似,最常受累的解剖部位是肺(66.9%),其次是骨(12.7%)和淋巴结(11.0%)。对于首次疾病进展后的患者,与ICIs单药治疗(9.63个月对4.23个月,P = 0.004,HR = 0.394,95%CI:0.174 - 0.893)和其他治疗(9.63个月对4.07个月,P = 0.046,HR = 0.565,95%CI:0.326 - 0.980)相比,基于检查点抑制剂的联合治疗可导致显著更长的PFS2。ICIs联合治疗组的中位OS未达到,但显著长于其他治疗组(未达到对14.37个月,P = 0.010,HR = 0.332,95%CI:0.167 - 0.661)。全身进展在接受ICIs的NSCLC患者中更频繁发生。基于检查点抑制剂的联合治疗作为先前ICIs治疗失败后的后续治疗策略显示出良好的疗效。