Waqas Muhammad, Mohib Khadija, Saleem Aniqa, Lnu Mahak, Arjumand Sabeen, Khalil Hafiz Habib Ur Rehman, Nosheen Rukhshanda, Abbas Sharmeen, Maqsood Kanza M, Abbas Kiran
Department of Gastroenterology, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
Department of Family Medicine, Tarzana Medical Group, Tarzana, USA.
Cureus. 2022 Apr 14;14(4):e24140. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24140. eCollection 2022 Apr.
Background infection (CDI) is a leading cause of hospital-acquired diarrhea. Rifaximin is an antibiotic that offers marginal resistance to bacteria. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of rifaximin in metronidazole non-responsive CDI patients. Methods A cross-sectional study was performed from August 2019 to May 2020 at the Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan. A total of 200 cases were included. Patients who developed diarrhea after receiving antibiotics for seven days and a positive toxin stool test as detected by the enzyme immunoassay (BioCheck, Inc., CA) were diagnosed with CDI. Only patients who were unresponsive to metronidazole therapy were enrolled in our analysis. Two groups were formed. The intervention group was administered 200 mg tablets of rifaximin three times a day for 10 days. For patients in the control group, no new treatment was started. The efficacy of rifaximin was defined in terms of the resolution of diarrhea after two weeks of therapy and a negative stool test. All data were recorded in a predefined pro forma. Results The mean age of 45.41 ± 8.54 years was found in the intervention group. The majority of the patients were aged 35-50 years. The majority of the patients had watery diarrhea, abdominal cramping, and loss of appetite on presentation. Rifaximin was found to be significantly effective in the resolution of symptoms of CDI, which was previously unresponsive to metronidazole (p<0.00001). it was found that the duration of diarrhea of more than three weeks was significantly associated with failure of therapy (p=0.03). Conclusion We concluded that rifaximin therapy is effective for patients of CDI non-responsive to metronidazole in more than 65% of the cases. Even though several new developments are made to address the concerned subject, such as microbiota transplantation, antibiotics, and immunotherapy, rifaximin can be considered for patients with metronidazole non-responsive CDI.
背景 艰难梭菌感染(CDI)是医院获得性腹泻的主要原因。利福昔明是一种对细菌耐药性较低的抗生素。本研究旨在评估利福昔明对甲硝唑治疗无效的CDI患者的疗效。方法 2019年8月至2020年5月在巴基斯坦拉合尔的拉合尔综合医院进行了一项横断面研究。共纳入200例病例。在接受抗生素治疗7天后出现腹泻且酶免疫测定(BioCheck公司,加利福尼亚州)检测粪便毒素呈阳性的患者被诊断为CDI。仅对甲硝唑治疗无反应的患者纳入我们的分析。分为两组。干预组每天三次服用200mg利福昔明片剂,共1天。对照组患者未开始新的治疗。利福昔明的疗效根据治疗两周后腹泻症状的缓解和粪便检测阴性来定义。所有数据记录在预定义的表格中。结果 干预组患者的平均年龄为45.41±8.54岁。大多数患者年龄在35 - 50岁之间。大多数患者就诊时出现水样腹泻、腹部绞痛和食欲不振。发现利福昔明对先前对甲硝唑无反应的CDI症状的缓解具有显著疗效(p<0.00001)。发现腹泻持续时间超过三周与治疗失败显著相关(p = 0.03)。结论 我们得出结论,利福昔明治疗对超过65%的甲硝唑治疗无效的CDI患者有效。尽管在解决相关问题方面有了一些新进展,如微生物群移植、抗生素和免疫疗法,但对于甲硝唑治疗无效的CDI患者,可以考虑使用利福昔明。