Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 Sep 9;114(9):1222-1227. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac099.
Recently developed clinical-benefit outcome scales by the European Society for Medical Oncology and the American Society of Clinical Oncology allow standardized objective evaluation of outcomes of randomized clinical trials. However, incorporation of clinical-benefit outcome scales into trial designs highlights a number of statistical issues: the relationship between minimal clinical benefit and the target treatment-effect alternative used in the trial design, designing trials to assess long-term benefit, potential problems with using a trial endpoint that is not overall survival, and how to incorporate subgroup analyses into the trial design. Using the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale as a basis for discussion, we review what these issues are and how they can guide the choice of trial-design target effects, appropriate endpoints, and prespecified subgroup analyses to increase the chances that the resulting trial outcomes can be appropriately evaluated for clinical benefit.
最近由欧洲肿瘤内科学会和美国临床肿瘤学会制定的临床获益结局量表允许对随机临床试验的结果进行标准化的客观评估。然而,将临床获益结局量表纳入试验设计凸显了许多统计学问题:最小临床获益与试验设计中使用的目标治疗效果替代之间的关系,设计评估长期获益的试验,使用非总生存作为试验终点可能存在的问题,以及如何将亚组分析纳入试验设计。本文以欧洲肿瘤内科学会临床获益量表为基础进行讨论,我们将回顾这些问题是什么,以及它们如何指导试验设计目标效果、适当的终点和预设亚组分析的选择,以增加试验结果能够得到适当的临床获益评估的机会。