• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

再次腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠手术后早期并发症:是否存在学习曲线?

Re-laparoscopy to Treat Early Complications After Colorectal Surgery: Is There a Learning Curve?

机构信息

Department of Surgery.

Division of Colorectal Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2022 Jun 1;32(3):362-367. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001052.

DOI:10.1097/SLE.0000000000001052
PMID:35583576
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopy for treating complications after laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) is still controversial. Moreover, its learning curve has not been evaluated yet. The aim of this study was to analyze whether operative outcomes were influenced by the learning curve of re-laparoscopy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing LCS and reoperated by a laparoscopic approach during the period 2000-2019 was performed. A cumulative sum analysis was done to determine the number of operations that must be performed to achieve a stable operative time. Based on this analysis, the cohort was divided in 3 groups. Demographics and operative variables were compared between groups.

RESULTS

From a total of 1911 patients undergoing LCS, 132 (7%) were included. Based on the cumulative sum analysis, the cohort was divided into the first 50 (G1), the following 52 (G2), and the last 30 (G3) patients. Less computed tomography scans were performed in G3 (G1: 72% vs. G2: 63% vs. G3: 43%; P=0.03). There were no differences in the type of operation performed between the groups. The conversion rate (G1: 18% vs. G2: 4% vs. G3: 3%; P=0.02) and the mean operative time (G1: 104 min vs. G2: 80 min vs. G3: 78 min; P=0.003) were higher in G1. Overall morbidity was lower in G3 (G1: 46% vs. G2: 63% vs. G3: 33%; P=0.01). Major morbidity, mortality, and mean length of stay remained similar in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A total of 50 laparoscopic reoperations might be needed to achieve an appropriate learning curve with reduced operative time and lower conversion rates. Further research is needed to determine the learning process of re-laparoscopy for treating complications after colorectal surgery.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜治疗腹腔镜结直肠手术后并发症仍存在争议。此外,其学习曲线尚未得到评估。本研究旨在分析腹腔镜再手术的手术结果是否受学习曲线的影响。

方法

对 2000 年至 2019 年期间行腹腔镜结直肠手术并再次接受腹腔镜治疗的患者进行回顾性分析。采用累积和分析来确定必须进行的手术次数,以达到稳定的手术时间。根据这项分析,将队列分为 3 组。比较组间的一般资料和手术变量。

结果

共纳入 1911 例行腹腔镜结直肠手术的患者,其中 132 例(7%)符合条件。根据累积和分析,将队列分为前 50 例(G1)、接下来 52 例(G2)和最后 30 例(G3)。G3 组进行的计算机断层扫描较少(G1:72%比 G2:63%比 G3:43%;P=0.03)。各组间手术类型无差异。G1 组中转率(G1:18%比 G2:4%比 G3:3%;P=0.02)和平均手术时间(G1:104 分钟比 G2:80 分钟比 G3:78 分钟;P=0.003)更高。G3 组总并发症发生率较低(G1:46%比 G2:63%比 G3:33%;P=0.01)。各组间主要并发症、死亡率和平均住院时间无差异。

结论

需要总共 50 例腹腔镜再手术,才能达到缩短手术时间和降低中转率的适当学习曲线。需要进一步研究确定腹腔镜治疗结直肠手术后并发症的再手术学习过程。

相似文献

1
Re-laparoscopy to Treat Early Complications After Colorectal Surgery: Is There a Learning Curve?再次腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠手术后早期并发症:是否存在学习曲线?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2022 Jun 1;32(3):362-367. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001052.
2
Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections.腹腔镜结直肠手术学习曲线的评估:右侧与左侧切除术的比较
Ann Surg. 2005 Jul;242(1):83-91. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000167857.14690.68.
3
"Early" Reoperation to Treat Complications Following Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: The Sooner the Better.腹腔镜结直肠手术后并发症的“早期”再次手术治疗:越早越好。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2021 Aug 18;31(6):756-759. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000984.
4
Postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing colorectal surgery with anastomotic leak before and after hospital discharge.结直肠手术患者出院前后发生吻合口漏的术后结局
Updates Surg. 2020 Jun;72(2):463-468. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00754-1. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
5
Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic sigmoid resection without diversion in perforated diverticulitis.腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术治疗穿孔性憩室炎的安全性和可行性。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar;34(3):1336-1342. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06910-y. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
6
"Relaparoscopy" to treat early complications following colorectal surgery.采用“再次腹腔镜检查”治疗结直肠手术后的早期并发症。
Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):3136-3140. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08616-6. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
7
Consecutive Laparoscopic Colorectal Resections in a Single Workday by the Same Surgeon: Efficient or Risky?同一位外科医生在单个工作日内连续进行腹腔镜结直肠切除术:高效还是有风险?
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022 Sep;32(9):969-973. doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0818. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
8
Analysis of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Learning Curve and Its Influence on Procedure Safety and Perioperative Complications.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术学习曲线及其对手术安全性和围手术期并发症影响的分析
Obes Surg. 2018 Jun;28(6):1672-1680. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-3075-x.
9
Laparoscopic Appendectomy Performed by Surgical Interns: Is it Too Early?外科实习生进行腹腔镜阑尾切除术:为时过早?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020 Oct 16;31(2):223-226. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000870.
10
[Safety and prognosis analysis of transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic mesorectal excision for mid-low rectal cancer].经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与腹腔镜直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的安全性及预后分析
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 25;25(6):522-530. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20210811-00321.

引用本文的文献

1
Cesena guidelines: WSES consensus statement on laparoscopic-first approach to general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma.切塞纳指南:WSES 关于普通外科急症和腹部创伤腹腔镜优先方法的共识声明。
World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Dec 8;18(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00520-9.
2
Training curriculum in minimally invasive emergency digestive surgery: 2022 WSES position paper.微创急诊消化外科学培训课程:2022 WSES 立场文件。
World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Jan 27;18(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00476-w.