Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany.
Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 1;79(7):677-689. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.1163.
Approaches are needed to stratify individuals in early psychosis stages beyond positive symptom severity to investigate specificity related to affective and normative variation and to validate solutions with premorbid, longitudinal, and genetic risk measures.
To use machine learning techniques to cluster, compare, and combine subgroup solutions using clinical and brain structural imaging data from early psychosis and depression stages.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A multisite, naturalistic, longitudinal cohort study (10 sites in 5 European countries; including major follow-up intervals at 9 and 18 months) with a referred patient sample of those with clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P), recent-onset psychosis (ROP), recent-onset depression (ROD), and healthy controls were recruited between February 1, 2014, to July 1, 2019. Data were analyzed between January 2020 and January 2022.
A nonnegative matrix factorization technique separately decomposed clinical (287 variables) and parcellated brain structural volume (204 gray, white, and cerebrospinal fluid regions) data across CHR-P, ROP, ROD, and healthy controls study groups. Stability criteria determined cluster number using nested cross-validation. Validation targets were compared across subgroup solutions (premorbid, longitudinal, and schizophrenia polygenic risk scores). Multiclass supervised machine learning produced a transferable solution to the validation sample.
There were a total of 749 individuals in the discovery group and 610 individuals in the validation group. Individuals included those with CHR-P (n = 287), ROP (n = 323), ROD (n = 285), and healthy controls (n = 464), The mean (SD) age was 25.1 (5.9) years, and 702 (51.7%) were female. A clinical 4-dimensional solution separated individuals based on positive symptoms, negative symptoms, depression, and functioning, demonstrating associations with all validation targets. Brain clustering revealed a subgroup with distributed brain volume reductions associated with negative symptoms, reduced performance IQ, and increased schizophrenia polygenic risk scores. Multilevel results distinguished between normative and illness-related brain differences. Subgroup results were largely validated in the external sample.
The results of this longitudinal cohort study provide stratifications beyond the expression of positive symptoms that cut across illness stages and diagnoses. Clinical results suggest the importance of negative symptoms, depression, and functioning. Brain results suggest substantial overlap across illness stages and normative variation, which may highlight a vulnerability signature independent from specific presentations. Premorbid, longitudinal, and genetic risk validation suggested clinical importance of the subgroups to preventive treatments.
需要采用方法来对早期精神病阶段的个体进行分层,超出阳性症状严重程度,以研究与情感和正常变化相关的特异性,并使用发病前、纵向和遗传风险措施验证解决方案。
使用机器学习技术使用来自早期精神病和抑郁症阶段的临床和大脑结构成像数据对亚组解决方案进行聚类、比较和组合。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项多地点、自然主义、纵向队列研究(来自 5 个欧洲国家的 10 个地点;包括 9 个月和 18 个月的主要随访间隔),研究对象为有临床高风险精神病(CHR-P)、近期发病精神病(ROP)、近期发病抑郁症(ROD)和健康对照组的患者样本,于 2014 年 2 月 1 日至 2019 年 7 月 1 日招募。数据分析于 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 1 月进行。
非负矩阵分解技术分别分解了临床(287 个变量)和分割的大脑结构体积(204 个灰质、白质和脑脊液区域)数据,涉及 CHR-P、ROP、ROD 和健康对照组研究组。嵌套交叉验证确定了稳定性标准的簇数。在亚组解决方案(发病前、纵向和精神分裂症多基因风险评分)之间比较了验证目标。多类监督机器学习对验证样本产生了可转移的解决方案。
发现组共有 749 人,验证组共有 610 人。研究对象包括 CHR-P(n=287)、ROP(n=323)、ROD(n=285)和健康对照组(n=464),平均(SD)年龄为 25.1(5.9)岁,702 人(51.7%)为女性。一个临床 4 维解决方案根据阳性症状、阴性症状、抑郁和功能将个体分开,与所有验证目标均相关。大脑聚类显示出与阴性症状、认知加工智商降低和精神分裂症多基因风险评分增加相关的大脑体积减少的亚组。多层次结果区分了正常和疾病相关的大脑差异。亚组结果在外部样本中得到了大部分验证。
这项纵向队列研究的结果提供了超出阳性症状表达的分层,跨越了疾病阶段和诊断。临床结果表明阴性症状、抑郁和功能的重要性。大脑结果表明疾病阶段之间存在大量重叠和正常变化,这可能突出了一种独立于特定表现的脆弱性特征。发病前、纵向和遗传风险验证表明,亚组对预防治疗具有临床重要性。