Macaudiere P, Tambute A, Caude M, Rosset R, Alembik M A, Wainer I W
J Chromatogr. 1986 Dec 26;371:177-93. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9673(01)94704-1.
Subcritical and supercritical fluid chromatography (SubFC and SFC) have been evaluated for the resolution of an homologous series of enantiomeric amides. The solutes were the 2-naphthoyl amides of an homologous series of amines, ranging from 2-aminobutane to 2-aminoctane, and the p-methyl-, p-methoxy- and p-chlorophenylamides of 2-aminoheptane. The chiral stationary phase (CSP) used was the covalent form of (R)-N-(3,5-dinitrobenzoyl)phenylglycine. In liquid chromatography (LC) the mobile phase comprised hexane-2-propanol--acetonitrile (97:3:0.5) at a flow-rate of 2 ml/min and temperatures of 20-35 degrees C. In SFC, the mobile were various mixtures of carbon dioxide and polar modifiers, such as alcohols, chloroform and water. For the best conditions in LC, the chiral resolution, alpha, increased through the homologous series from alpha = 1.03 for the amide derived from 2-aminobutane to alpha = 1.11 for the 2-aminooctane amide. The values of alpha observed for the pi-basic amides of 2-aminoheptane (p-methyl and p-methoxy) were greater than that observed for the pi-acidic amide (p-chloro), i.e., alpha = 1.08 versus 1.04. The selectivities, resolutions and efficiencies obtained by LC and SubFC were similar. These results indicate that the mechanism of chiral recognition is the same in LC and SubFC and that the methods should be interchangeable. The actual analysis time for SubFC was significantly shorter than that required for LC: as short as 2 min for the 2-aminooctane amide, whereas LC takes over 10 min under the best conditions.
已对亚临界流体色谱法和超临界流体色谱法(SubFC和SFC)用于拆分一系列对映体酰胺的效果进行了评估。溶质为一系列胺的2-萘甲酰胺,范围从2-氨基丁烷到2-氨基辛烷,以及2-氨基庚烷的对甲基、对甲氧基和对氯苯甲酰胺。所使用的手性固定相(CSP)为(R)-N-(3,5-二硝基苯甲酰基)苯甘氨酸的共价形式。在液相色谱法(LC)中,流动相由己烷-2-丙醇-乙腈(97:3:0.5)组成,流速为2 ml/min,温度为20-35摄氏度。在SFC中,流动相为二氧化碳与极性改性剂(如醇类、氯仿和水)的各种混合物。对于LC的最佳条件,手性拆分度α在同系物系列中逐渐增加,从2-氨基丁烷衍生的酰胺的α = 1.03增加到2-氨基辛烷酰胺的α = 1.11。2-氨基庚烷的π-碱性酰胺(对甲基和对甲氧基)的α值大于π-酸性酰胺(对氯)的α值,即α = 1.08对1.04。LC和SubFC获得的选择性、拆分度和效率相似。这些结果表明,LC和SubFC中的手性识别机制相同,且这两种方法应可互换。SubFC的实际分析时间明显短于LC所需的时间:对于2-氨基辛烷酰胺,短至2分钟,而LC在最佳条件下需要超过10分钟。