Compassion Research Lab, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Section of Palliative Care, Department of Family Medicine, Alberta Health Services, Zone, Calgary, Canada.
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 May 18;21(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-00942-3.
A previous review on compassion in healthcare (1988-2014) identified several empirical studies and their limitations. Given the large influx and the disparate nature of the topic within the healthcare literature over the past 5 years, the objective of this study was to provide an update to our original scoping review to provide a current and comprehensive map of the literature to guide future research and to identify gaps and limitations that remain unaddressed.
Eight electronic databases along with the grey literature were searched to identify empirical studies published between 2015 and 2020. Of focus were studies that aimed to explore compassion within the clinical setting, or interventions or educational programs for improving compassion, sampling clinicians and/or patient populations. Following title and abstract review, two reviewers independently screened full-text articles, and performed data extraction. Utilizing a narrative synthesis approach, data were mapped onto the categories, themes, and subthemes that were identified in the original review. Newly identified categories were discussed among the team until consensus was achieved.
Of the 14,166 number of records identified, 5263 remained after removal of duplicates, and 50 articles were included in the final review. Studies were predominantly conducted in the UK and were qualitative in design. In contrast to the original review, a larger number of studies sampled solely patients (n = 12), and the remainder focused on clinicians (n = 27) or a mix of clinicians and other (e.g. patients and/or family members) (n = 11). Forty-six studies explored perspectives on the nature of compassion or compassionate behaviours, traversing six themes: nature of compassion, development of compassion, interpersonal factors related to compassion, action and practical compassion, barriers and enablers of compassion, and outcomes of compassion. Four studies reported on the category of educational or clinical interventions, a notable decrease compared to the 10 studies identified in the original review.
Since the original scoping review on compassion in healthcare, while a greater number of studies incorporated patient perspectives, clinical or educational interventions appeared to be limited. More efficacious and evidence-based interventions or training programs tailored towards improving compassion for patients in healthcare is required.
先前关于医疗保健中的同情心的综述(1988-2014 年)确定了几项实证研究及其局限性。鉴于过去 5 年来,医疗保健文献中该主题的大量涌入和性质的不同,本研究的目的是对我们最初的范围综述进行更新,为文献提供当前和全面的图谱,以指导未来的研究,并确定仍未解决的差距和局限性。
检索了八个电子数据库以及灰色文献,以确定 2015 年至 2020 年期间发表的实证研究。重点是旨在探索临床环境中的同情心的研究,或改善同情心的干预或教育计划,抽样临床医生和/或患者人群。在标题和摘要审查后,两名审查员独立筛选全文文章,并进行数据提取。利用叙述性综合方法,将数据映射到原始综述中确定的类别、主题和子主题上。新确定的类别在团队中进行讨论,直到达成共识。
在去除重复项后,从 14166 条记录中保留了 5263 条,最终综述包括 50 篇文章。研究主要在英国进行,设计为定性。与原始综述相比,更多的研究仅抽样患者(n=12),其余研究主要集中在临床医生(n=27)或临床医生和其他(例如患者和/或家庭成员)的混合(n=11)。46 项研究探讨了对同情心或同情行为本质的看法,跨越了六个主题:同情心的本质、同情心的发展、与同情心相关的人际关系因素、行动和实际同情心、同情心的障碍和促进因素、以及同情心的结果。四项研究报告了教育或临床干预类别的情况,与原始综述中确定的 10 项研究相比,这一数字明显减少。
自医疗保健中的同情心最初的范围综述以来,虽然更多的研究纳入了患者观点,但临床或教育干预似乎受到限制。需要更有效和基于证据的干预措施或培训计划,以改善医疗保健中患者的同情心。