• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应激性高血糖对行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者无复流现象的影响。

Impact of Stress Hyperglycemia on No-Reflow Phenomenon in Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

机构信息

Cardiovascular department, Tanta University, EG.

出版信息

Glob Heart. 2022 Mar 29;17(1):23. doi: 10.5334/gh.1111. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.5334/gh.1111
PMID:35586740
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8973831/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stress hyperglycemia is a common finding during acute myocardial infarction and associated with poor prognosis. To reduce the occurrence of no-reflow, prognostic factors must be identified before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Our objective was to investigate the impact of stress hyperglycemia in non-diabetic and diabetic patients on no-reflow phenomenon after PPCI.

METHODS

The study comprised 480 patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who were managed by PPCI. Patients were classified into two groups according to thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade: Group I (Patients with normal flow, TIMI 3 flow) and Group II (Patients with no-reflow, TIMI 0-2 flow). Patients were analyzed for clinical outcomes including mortality and major adverse cardiac events.

RESULTS

Incidence of stress hyperglycemia was 14.8% in non-diabetic patients and 22.2% in diabetic patients; the incidence of no-reflow phenomenon was 13.5% and no-reflow was significantly higher in patients with stress hyperglycemia. Multivariate regression analysis identified the independent predictors of no-reflow phenomenon: stress hyperglycemia OR 3.247 (CI95% 1.656-6.368, P = 0.001), Killip class >1 OR 1.893 (CI95% 1.004-3.570, P = 0.049) and cardiogenic shock OR 3.778 (CI95% 1.458-9.790, P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Stress hyperglycemia was associated with higher incidence of no-reflow phenomenon. The independent predictors of no-reflow were stress hyperglycemia, Killip class >1 and cardiogenic shock.

摘要

背景

应激性高血糖在急性心肌梗死中很常见,与预后不良有关。为了减少无复流的发生,必须在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)前确定预后因素。我们的目的是研究非糖尿病和糖尿病患者应激性高血糖对 PPCI 后无复流现象的影响。

方法

本研究纳入了 480 例接受 PPCI 治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者。根据心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TIMI)血流分级将患者分为两组:组 I(血流正常,TIMI 3 级血流)和组 II(无复流,TIMI 0-2 级血流)。分析患者的临床结局,包括死亡率和主要不良心脏事件。

结果

非糖尿病患者应激性高血糖发生率为 14.8%,糖尿病患者为 22.2%;无复流现象的发生率为 13.5%,应激性高血糖患者的无复流发生率明显更高。多变量回归分析确定了无复流现象的独立预测因素:应激性高血糖 OR 3.247(95%CI 1.656-6.368,P = 0.001),Killip 分级>1 OR 1.893(95%CI 1.004-3.570,P = 0.049)和心源性休克 OR 3.778(95%CI 1.458-9.790,P = 0.006)。

结论

应激性高血糖与无复流现象发生率升高相关。无复流的独立预测因素是应激性高血糖、Killip 分级>1 和心源性休克。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64da/8973831/63e053412c6a/gh-17-1-1111-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64da/8973831/d437b97458b9/gh-17-1-1111-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64da/8973831/cb4f8b839e90/gh-17-1-1111-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64da/8973831/63e053412c6a/gh-17-1-1111-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64da/8973831/d437b97458b9/gh-17-1-1111-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64da/8973831/cb4f8b839e90/gh-17-1-1111-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64da/8973831/63e053412c6a/gh-17-1-1111-g3.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of Stress Hyperglycemia on No-Reflow Phenomenon in Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.应激性高血糖对行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者无复流现象的影响。
Glob Heart. 2022 Mar 29;17(1):23. doi: 10.5334/gh.1111. eCollection 2022.
2
Incidence, predictors and outcomes of stress hyperglycemia in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后应激性高血糖的发生率、预测因素和转归。
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2020 Jan-Feb;17(1):1479164119883983. doi: 10.1177/1479164119883983. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
3
Association of monocyte count on admission with angiographic no-reflow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者入院时单核细胞计数与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后血管造影无复流的相关性。
Kardiol Pol. 2016;74(10):1160-1166. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2016.0065. Epub 2016 May 10.
4
Impact of the Total Ischemia Time on No-Reflow Phenomenon in Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.总缺血时间对行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者无复流现象的影响。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2022 May;26(5):382-387. doi: 10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2021.846.
5
The relationship between serum rheumatoid factor level and no-reflow phenomenon in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时血清类风湿因子水平与无复流现象的关系
J Clin Lab Anal. 2018 Nov;32(9):e22598. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22598. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
6
The Elevated Soluble ST2 Predicts No-Reflow Phenomenon in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.可溶性 ST2 水平升高可预测行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死无复流现象。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2019 Nov 1;26(11):970-978. doi: 10.5551/jat.48413. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
7
Usefulness of Mean Platelet Volume-to-Lymphocyte Ratio for Predicting Angiographic No-Reflow and Short-Term Prognosis After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.平均血小板体积与淋巴细胞比值对预测ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后血管造影无复流及短期预后的价值
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Aug 15;120(4):534-541. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.05.020. Epub 2017 May 30.
8
Heterogeneity of the No-Reflow Group After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Due to ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction - Are There Sex Differences?ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后无复流现象的组间差异:是否存在性别差异?
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Apr;37:97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.06.014. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
9
Predictive value of admission red cell distribution width-platelet ratio for no-reflow phenomenon in acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.入院时红细胞分布宽度-血小板比值对接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者无复流现象的预测价值
Cardiol J. 2016;23(1):84-92. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2015.0070. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
10
No reflow phenomenon in percutaneous coronary interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的无复流现象
Indian Heart J. 2016 Jul-Aug;68(4):539-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Stress Hyperglycemia Ratio as a Predictor of In-Hospital Stent Thrombosis in STEMI Patients Undergoing Primary PCI: A Retrospective Cohort Study.应激性高血糖比值作为接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者院内支架血栓形成的预测指标:一项回顾性队列研究
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jun 26;61(7):1158. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071158.
2
The association between stress hyperglycemia ratio and 1-year outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a retrospective large sample cohort study.应激性高血糖比值与急性心肌梗死患者1年预后的关联:一项回顾性大样本队列研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 15;16:1586541. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1586541. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Incidence, Predictors and Outcomes of Contrast Induced Nephropathy in Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后对比剂肾病的发生率、预测因素和转归。
Glob Heart. 2021 Aug 31;16(1):57. doi: 10.5334/gh.1071. eCollection 2021.
2
Association of stress hyperglycemia ratio with intracoronary thrombus burden in diabetic patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.应激性高血糖比值与ST段抬高型心肌梗死糖尿病患者冠状动脉内血栓负荷的相关性
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Nov;12(11):6598-6608. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-2111.
3
Predictive value of the triglyceride-glucose index for no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated by metabolic syndrome.
急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并代谢综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数对无复流现象的预测价值
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Oct 15;16(10):5539-5551. doi: 10.62347/HQVS4428. eCollection 2024.
4
Impact of smoking on procedural outcomes and all-cause mortality following acute myocardial infarction: A misleading early-stage pseudoparadox with ultimately reduced survival.吸烟对急性心肌梗死后手术结局和全因死亡率的影响:一个具有误导性的早期假悖论,最终导致生存率降低。
Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2024 Sep 27;23:200336. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2024.200336. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Long-Term Prognostic Impact of Stress Hyperglycemia in Non-Diabetic Patients Treated with Successful Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.成功接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的非糖尿病患者应激性高血糖的长期预后影响
J Pers Med. 2024 May 31;14(6):591. doi: 10.3390/jpm14060591.
6
Could Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value be a Marker for the Diagnosis of Coronary Slow Flow Phenomenon?全免疫炎症值能否成为冠状动脉慢血流现象诊断的标志物?
Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2024 May;24(5):519-526. doi: 10.1007/s12012-024-09855-4. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
7
Stress Hyperglycemia Drives the Risk of Hospitalization for Chest Pain in Patients With Ischemia and Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries (INOCA).应激性高血糖导致有缺血但无阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(INOCA)的胸痛患者住院风险增加。
Diabetes Care. 2023 Feb 1;46(2):450-454. doi: 10.2337/dc22-0783.
Very Early Versus Early Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Decreased e-GFR after Successful Fibrinolytic Therapy.
成功溶栓治疗后 eGFR 降低的患者中,非常早期与早期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较。
Glob Heart. 2020 Apr 16;15(1):34. doi: 10.5334/gh.794.
4
Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者新发心房颤动的发生率、预测因素和转归。
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2020 Jul;25(4):e12746. doi: 10.1111/anec.12746. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
5
Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Is it Affected by Treatment Strategy?ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的对比剂肾病:治疗策略是否有影响?
Glob Heart. 2019 Sep;14(3):295-302. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2019.07.001.
6
2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: .2. 糖尿病的分类和诊断:
Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(Suppl 1):S13-S28. doi: 10.2337/dc19-S002.
7
Very Early Versus Early Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Successful Fibrinolytic Therapy in Pharmacoinvasive Strategy.药物介入策略下溶栓治疗成功后即刻与早期行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较。
Glob Heart. 2018 Dec;13(4):261-265. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
8
Prognostic Value of the Acute-to-Chronic Glycemic Ratio at Admission in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Prospective Study.入院时急性血糖与慢性血糖比值对急性心肌梗死的预后价值:一项前瞻性研究。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Apr;41(4):847-853. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1732. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
9
Clinical impact of admission hyperglycemia on in-hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction patients.入院时高血糖对急性心肌梗死患者院内死亡率的临床影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Jun 1;236:9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.01.095. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
10
No reflow phenomenon in percutaneous coronary interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的无复流现象
Indian Heart J. 2016 Jul-Aug;68(4):539-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Apr 19.