• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成功溶栓治疗后 eGFR 降低的患者中,非常早期与早期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较。

Very Early Versus Early Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Decreased e-GFR after Successful Fibrinolytic Therapy.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, EG.

出版信息

Glob Heart. 2020 Apr 16;15(1):34. doi: 10.5334/gh.794.

DOI:10.5334/gh.794
PMID:32489807
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7218786/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pharmacoinvasive strategy (PIS) is the alternative approach to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) if PCI capable center isn't available especially in the developing countries. Our objective of the current study was to investigate the incidence of contrast induced nephropathy (CIN), the occurrence of no reflow phenomenon and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate (e-GFR) after successful fibrinolytic therapy in order to assess the benefit from very early PCI strategy (within 3-12 hours) or early PCI strategy (within 12-24 hours).

METHODS

This randomized clinical trial included 420 patients with STEMI. All participants were classified randomly into two groups according to the time of intervention; Group I patients were subjected to very early PCI (within 3-12 hours) and Group II patients were subjected to early PCI (within 12-24 hours) after receiving successful fibrinolytic therapy.

RESULTS

The incidence of CIN in Group I was slightly higher than Group II (23 patients [10.7%] versus 19 patients [9.3%]) respectively, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P value = 0.625). The incidence of no-reflow phenomenon (TIMI 0-2 flow) after the procedure was higher in Group II, while TIMI 3 flow (normal flow) was significantly higher in Group I than Group II (184 [85.6%] vs. 153 [74.6%], respectively) with P value = 0.044. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding mortality and MACE.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of CIN was nearly equal in very early PCI (within 3-12 hours) versus early PCI (within 12-24 hours); however, the incidence of no-reflow phenomenon was significantly higher in patients subjected to early PCI (within 12-24 hours).

摘要

背景

如果没有可进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的中心,尤其是在发展中国家,那么药物侵入性策略(PIS)是替代的方法。我们目前的研究目的是评估在成功溶栓治疗后肾小球滤过率(e-GFR)降低的患者中,早期 PCI 策略(3-12 小时内)或即刻 PCI 策略(12-24 小时内)的对比剂肾病(CIN)发生率、无复流现象的发生和主要不良心脏事件(MACE)。

方法

这是一项随机临床试验,纳入了 420 例 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者。所有患者根据干预时间随机分为两组;I 组患者接受早期 PCI(3-12 小时内),II 组患者接受即刻 PCI(12-24 小时内)。

结果

I 组的 CIN 发生率略高于 II 组(分别为 23 例[10.7%]和 19 例[9.3%]),但两组间无统计学差异(P 值=0.625)。术后 II 组无复流现象(TIMI 0-2 级血流)发生率较高,而 I 组 TIMI 3 级血流(正常血流)明显高于 II 组(分别为 184 例[85.6%]和 153 例[74.6%]),P 值=0.044。两组死亡率和 MACE 无统计学差异。

结论

早期 PCI(3-12 小时内)与即刻 PCI(12-24 小时内)的 CIN 发生率几乎相等;然而,早期 PCI(12-24 小时内)患者无复流现象发生率明显更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d51/7218786/ca5ac188c3c0/gh-15-1-794-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d51/7218786/72ccd1727152/gh-15-1-794-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d51/7218786/ca5ac188c3c0/gh-15-1-794-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d51/7218786/72ccd1727152/gh-15-1-794-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d51/7218786/ca5ac188c3c0/gh-15-1-794-g2.jpg

相似文献

1
Very Early Versus Early Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Decreased e-GFR after Successful Fibrinolytic Therapy.成功溶栓治疗后 eGFR 降低的患者中,非常早期与早期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较。
Glob Heart. 2020 Apr 16;15(1):34. doi: 10.5334/gh.794.
2
Very Early Versus Early Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Successful Fibrinolytic Therapy in Pharmacoinvasive Strategy.药物介入策略下溶栓治疗成功后即刻与早期行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较。
Glob Heart. 2018 Dec;13(4):261-265. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
3
Efficacy and Safety of a Pharmaco-Invasive Strategy With Half-Dose Alteplase Versus Primary Angioplasty in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: EARLY-MYO Trial (Early Routine Catheterization After Alteplase Fibrinolysis Versus Primary PCI in Acute ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction).半剂量阿替普酶与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死中的疗效和安全性:EARLY-MYO 试验(阿替普酶溶栓后早期常规冠状动脉造影与急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较)。
Circulation. 2017 Oct 17;136(16):1462-1473. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030582. Epub 2017 Aug 27.
4
Left ventricular global longitudinal strain following revascularization in acute ST elevation myocardial infarction - A comparison of primary angioplasty and Streptokinase-based pharmacoinvasive strategy.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死血管重建术后左心室整体纵向应变——直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与基于链激酶的药物介入策略的比较
Indian Heart J. 2017 Nov-Dec;69(6):695-699. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2017.04.010. Epub 2017 May 9.
5
Relationship Between Arterial Access and Outcomes in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With a Pharmacoinvasive Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategy: Insights From the STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM) Study.药物介入与直接经皮冠状动脉介入策略治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的动脉入路与结局的关系:来自心肌梗死后早期强化再灌注策略(STREAM)研究的见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jun 13;5(6):e003559. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003559.
6
Bleeding complications after contemporary pharmacoinvasive therapy for ST elevation myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死当代药物侵入性治疗后的出血并发症
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2004 Dec;18(3):187-92. doi: 10.1007/s11239-005-0344-7.
7
Pharmacoinvasive and Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategies in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (from the Mayo Clinic STEMI Network).ST段抬高型心肌梗死的药物侵入性与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗策略(来自梅奥诊所ST段抬高型心肌梗死网络)
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jun 15;117(12):1904-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.03.036. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
8
Pharmacoinvasive Strategy Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者药物介入策略与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的倾向评分匹配分析
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Sep;9(9). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003508.
9
Safety and Efficacy of a Pharmacoinvasive Strategy in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Patient Population Study Comparing a Pharmacoinvasive Strategy With a Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategy Within a Regional System.药物侵入性策略在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死中的安全性和疗效:比较区域性系统内药物侵入性策略与直接经皮冠状动脉介入策略的患者人群研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct 10;9(19):2014-2020. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.004.
10
Outcomes of a pharmacoinvasive strategy for successful versus failed fibrinolysis and primary percutaneous intervention in acute myocardial infarction (from the STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction [STREAM] study).急性心肌梗死溶栓治疗成功与失败及直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的临床转归(来自心肌梗死溶栓后早期进行血运重建策略[STREAM]研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Sep 15;114(6):811-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.06.011. Epub 2014 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
The assessment of no-reflow phenomenon incidence in early versus delayed percutaneous coronary intervention following a primary fibrinolysis.在初次溶栓后早期与延迟经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中无复流现象发生率的评估。
ARYA Atheroscler. 2024 Mar-Apr;20(2):31-40. doi: 10.48305/arya.2024.42104.2921.
2
Impact of Patient Unawareness and Socioeconomic Factors on Patient Presentation to Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.患者认知度和社会经济因素对初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者就诊的影响。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2022 Jul;119(1):25-34. doi: 10.36660/abc.20210521.
3
Impact of Stress Hyperglycemia on No-Reflow Phenomenon in Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

本文引用的文献

1
Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Is it Affected by Treatment Strategy?ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的对比剂肾病:治疗策略是否有影响?
Glob Heart. 2019 Sep;14(3):295-302. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2019.07.001.
2
Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018).心肌梗死的第四次全球定义(2018年)。
Glob Heart. 2018 Dec;13(4):305-338. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
3
Very Early Versus Early Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Successful Fibrinolytic Therapy in Pharmacoinvasive Strategy.
应激性高血糖对行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者无复流现象的影响。
Glob Heart. 2022 Mar 29;17(1):23. doi: 10.5334/gh.1111. eCollection 2022.
4
Impact of the Total Ischemia Time on No-Reflow Phenomenon in Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.总缺血时间对行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者无复流现象的影响。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2022 May;26(5):382-387. doi: 10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2021.846.
5
Incidence, Predictors and Outcomes of Contrast Induced Nephropathy in Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后对比剂肾病的发生率、预测因素和转归。
Glob Heart. 2021 Aug 31;16(1):57. doi: 10.5334/gh.1071. eCollection 2021.
药物介入策略下溶栓治疗成功后即刻与早期行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较。
Glob Heart. 2018 Dec;13(4):261-265. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
4
2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理工作组
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-177. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393.
5
Contrast-induced nephropathy after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死直接血管成形术后的对比剂肾病
J Bras Nefrol. 2015 Oct-Dec;37(4):439-45. doi: 10.5935/0101-2800.20150070.
6
Coronary microvascular obstruction in acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死中的冠状动脉微血管阻塞。
Eur Heart J. 2016 Apr 1;37(13):1024-33. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv484. Epub 2015 Sep 12.
7
2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI).2014年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)和欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)心肌血运重建特别工作组编写,欧洲经皮心血管介入协会(EAPCI)提供特别贡献。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 1;35(37):2541-619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
8
Predictive factors of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing primary coronary angioplasty.接受初次冠状动脉血管成形术患者中造影剂肾病的预测因素。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2014 Aug-Sep;107(8-9):424-32. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2014.05.008. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
9
Contrast-induced acute kidney injury after primary percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the HORIZONS-AMI substudy.初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后对比剂诱导的急性肾损伤:HORIZONS-AMI 子研究结果。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Jun 14;35(23):1533-40. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu063. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
10
Myocardial reperfusion injury: looking beyond primary PCI.心肌再灌注损伤:超越直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的视角。
Eur Heart J. 2013 Jun;34(23):1714-22. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht090. Epub 2013 Mar 27.