• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

上颌骨全口种植体支持固定义齿不同支架的机械响应:三维有限元分析。

Mechanical response of different frameworks for maxillary all-on-four implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: 3D finite element analysis.

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Bursa Uludağ University, Bursa, Turkey.

出版信息

Biomed Tech (Berl). 2022 Aug 17;67(5):419-428. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2022-0176. Print 2022 Oct 26.

DOI:10.1515/bmt-2022-0176
PMID:35972416
Abstract

This study's purpose is to assess the stress distribution in the peri-implant bone, implants, and prosthetic framework using two different posterior implant angles. All-on-four maxillary prostheses fabricated from feldspathic-ceramic-veneered zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) and feldspathic-ceramic-veneered cobalt-chromium (CoCr) were designed with 17 or 30-degree-angled posterior implants. Posterior cantilever and frontal vertical loads were applied to all models. The distribution of maximum and minimum principal stresses (σmax and σmin) and von Mises stress (σVM) was evaluated. Under posterior cantilever load, with an increase in posterior implant angle, σmax decreased by 4 and 7 MPa in the cortical bone when ZLS and CoCr were used as a prosthetic framework, respectively. Regardless of the framework material, 17-degree-angled posterior implants showed the highest σVM (541.36 MPa under posterior cantilever load; 110.79 MPa under frontal vertical load) values. Regardless of the posterior implant angle, ZLS framework showed the highest σVM (91.59 MPa under posterior cantilever load; 218.99 MPa under frontal vertical load) values. Increasing implant angle from 17 to 30° caused a decrease in σmax values in the cortical bone. Designs with 30-degree posterior implant angles and ZLS framework material may be preferred in All-on-four implant-supported fixed complete dentures.

摘要

本研究旨在评估两种不同后牙种植体角度下种植体周围骨、种植体和修复体支架的应力分布。全上颌无牙颌种植体采用长石陶瓷贴面氧化锆增强硅酸锂(ZLS)和长石陶瓷贴面钴铬(CoCr)制作,设计有 17 度或 30 度后牙种植体。所有模型均施加后牙悬臂和前牙垂直载荷。评估最大和最小主应力(σmax 和 σmin)和 von Mises 应力(σVM)的分布情况。在后牙悬臂载荷下,随着后牙种植体角度的增加,当使用 ZLS 和 CoCr 作为修复体支架时,皮质骨中的 σmax 分别降低了 4 和 7 MPa。无论框架材料如何,17 度后牙种植体的 σVM 值最高(后牙悬臂载荷下为 541.36 MPa;前牙垂直载荷下为 110.79 MPa)。无论后牙种植体角度如何,ZLS 框架的 σVM 值最高(后牙悬臂载荷下为 91.59 MPa;前牙垂直载荷下为 218.99 MPa)。后牙种植体角度从 17 度增加到 30 度会导致皮质骨中的 σmax 值降低。在后牙种植体角度为 30 度和 ZLS 框架材料的设计中,可能更倾向于在全上颌四牙种植体支持的固定全口义齿中使用。

相似文献

1
Mechanical response of different frameworks for maxillary all-on-four implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: 3D finite element analysis.上颌骨全口种植体支持固定义齿不同支架的机械响应:三维有限元分析。
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2022 Aug 17;67(5):419-428. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2022-0176. Print 2022 Oct 26.
2
Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic materials and posterior implant angles in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite element analysis.三维有限元分析比较全口 4 颗种植体即刻负重治疗概念中不同种植体材料和后牙种植体角度的生物力学差异。
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2022 May 20;67(4):307-315. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2022-0109. Print 2022 Aug 26.
3
The effect of the design of a mandibular implant-supported zirconia prosthesis on stress distribution.下颌种植体支持氧化锆修复体设计对其应力分布的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Mar;125(3):502.e1-502.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.05.027. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
4
Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.通过三维有限元分析比较All-on-4治疗理念中不同种植体倾斜度和悬臂长度的生物力学特性
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Jan/Feb;33(1):64-71. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6201.
5
Biomechanical behavior of implant retained prostheses in the posterior maxilla using different materials: a finite element study.种植体支持的上颌后部修复体不同材料的生物力学行为:有限元研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Apr 15;24(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04142-8.
6
Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.上颌前部区域不同连接方式、长度和直径种植体生物力学行为的三维有限元分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jan-Feb;31(1):101-10. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4120. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
7
[Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different framework materials in implant-supported fixed mandibular prosthesis].种植体支持的下颌固定义齿中不同支架材料的三维有限元分析
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Feb 9;56(2):190-195. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20200430-00240.
8
Finite element analysis of implant-supported prosthesis with pontic and cantilever in the posterior maxilla.上颌后牙区带桥体和悬臂的种植支持式修复体的有限元分析
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2017 May;20(6):663-670. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2017.1287905. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
9
Comparison of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible--a computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis.不同设计的种植体固位覆盖义齿与固定全颌种植义齿修复体在下颌无牙颌骨应力分布的比较——基于 CT 的三维有限元分析。
J Biomech. 2013 Apr 26;46(7):1312-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.02.008. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
10
Effects of all-on-four implant designs in mandible on implants and the surrounding bone: A 3-D finite element analysis.下颌骨全口四颗种植体设计对种植体及周围骨组织的影响:三维有限元分析
Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;23(4):456-463. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_471_19.