• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

磁共振图像纹理分析鉴别良恶性黏液样软组织肿瘤:一项回顾性对比研究。

Texture analysis of magnetic resonance image to differentiate benign from malignant myxoid soft tissue tumors: A retrospective comparative study.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 May 19;17(5):e0267569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267569. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0267569
PMID:35587928
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9119440/
Abstract

It is important to differentiate between benign and malignant myxoid tumors to establish the treatment plan, determine the optimal surgical extent, and plan postoperative surveillance, but differentiation may be complicated by imaging-feature overlap. Texture analysis is used for quantitative assessment of imaging characteristics based on mathematically calculated pixel heterogeneity and has been applied to the discrimination of benign from malignant soft tissue tumors (STTs). In this study, we aimed to assess the diagnostic value of the texture features of conventional magnetic resonance images for the differentiation of benign from malignant myxoid STTs. Magnetic resonance images of 39 patients with histologically confirmed myxoid STTs of the extremities were analyzed. Qualitative features were assessed and compared between the benign and malignant groups. Texture analysis was performed, and texture features were selected based on univariate analysis and Fisher's coefficient. The diagnostic value of the texture features was assessed using receiver operating curve analysis. T1 heterogeneity showed a statistically significant difference between benign and malignant myxoid STTs, with substantial inter-reader reliability. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of T1 heterogeneity were 55.6%, 83.3%, 88.2%, 45.5%, and 64.1%, respectively. Among the texture features, T2w-WavEnLL_s-3 showed good diagnostic performance, and T2w-WavEnLL_s-4 and GeoW4 showed fair diagnostic performance. The logistic regression model including T1 heterogeneity and T2_WavEnLL_s-4 showed good diagnostic performance. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the overall qualitative assessment by a radiologist and the predictor model. Geometry-based and wavelet-derived texture features from T2-weighted images were significantly different between benign and malignant myxoid STTs. However, the texture features had a limited additive value in differentiating benign from malignant myxoid STTs.

摘要

区分良性和恶性黏液样肿瘤对于制定治疗计划、确定最佳手术范围和规划术后监测非常重要,但影像学特征的重叠可能会使鉴别变得复杂。纹理分析用于基于数学计算的像素异质性对影像学特征进行定量评估,已应用于鉴别良性和恶性软组织肿瘤(STT)。本研究旨在评估常规磁共振成像纹理特征对区分四肢黏液样 STT 的良恶性的诊断价值。分析了 39 例经组织学证实的四肢黏液样 STT 患者的磁共振图像。评估并比较了良性和恶性组之间的定性特征。进行了纹理分析,并基于单变量分析和费希尔系数选择纹理特征。使用受试者工作特征曲线分析评估纹理特征的诊断价值。T1 异质性在良性和恶性黏液样 STT 之间存在统计学显著差异,具有较大的读者间可靠性。T1 异质性的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性分别为 55.6%、83.3%、88.2%、45.5%和 64.1%。在纹理特征中,T2w-WavEnLL_s-3 具有良好的诊断性能,T2w-WavEnLL_s-4 和 GeoW4 具有较好的诊断性能。包括 T1 异质性和 T2_WavEnLL_s-4 的逻辑回归模型显示出良好的诊断性能。然而,放射科医生的整体定性评估与预测模型之间没有统计学上的显著差异。T2 加权图像的基于几何和基于小波的纹理特征在良性和恶性黏液样 STT 之间存在显著差异。然而,纹理特征在区分良性和恶性黏液样 STT 方面的附加价值有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6481/9119440/e522d8089001/pone.0267569.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6481/9119440/4d8889ba84c4/pone.0267569.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6481/9119440/e522d8089001/pone.0267569.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6481/9119440/4d8889ba84c4/pone.0267569.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6481/9119440/e522d8089001/pone.0267569.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Texture analysis of magnetic resonance image to differentiate benign from malignant myxoid soft tissue tumors: A retrospective comparative study.磁共振图像纹理分析鉴别良恶性黏液样软组织肿瘤:一项回顾性对比研究。
PLoS One. 2022 May 19;17(5):e0267569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267569. eCollection 2022.
2
Tumor spatial heterogeneity in myxoid-containing soft tissue using texture analysis of diffusion-weighted MRI.使用扩散加权磁共振成像的纹理分析评估含黏液样软组织中的肿瘤空间异质性
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 14;12(7):e0181339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181339. eCollection 2017.
3
Soft tissue masses with myxoid stroma: Can conventional magnetic resonance imaging differentiate benign from malignant tumors?具有黏液样基质的软组织肿块:传统磁共振成像能否区分良性肿瘤与恶性肿瘤?
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Oct;85(10):1875-1882. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.08.015. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
4
Characterization of small, deeply located soft-tissue tumors: Conventional magnetic resonance imaging features and apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiation between non-malignancy and malignancy.小而深在的软组织肿瘤的特征:常规磁共振成像特征与表观扩散系数在良恶性鉴别诊断中的应用。
PLoS One. 2020 May 7;15(5):e0232622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232622. eCollection 2020.
5
Diagnostic Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Discriminating Benign and Malignant Soft Tissue Tumors.磁共振成像在鉴别良恶性软组织肿瘤中的诊断性能
Int J Gen Med. 2023 Apr 19;16:1383-1391. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S408962. eCollection 2023.
6
Ensemble learning-based radiomics with multi-sequence magnetic resonance imaging for benign and malignant soft tissue tumor differentiation.基于集成学习的多序列磁共振成像放射组学在良恶性软组织肿瘤鉴别中的应用。
PLoS One. 2023 May 31;18(5):e0286417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286417. eCollection 2023.
7
Diagnostic Performance of Elastography in Malignant Soft Tissue Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.弹性成像在恶性软组织肿瘤中的诊断性能:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021 Apr;47(4):855-868. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.12.017. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
8
Tumor grade in soft-tissue sarcoma: Prediction with magnetic resonance imaging texture analysis.软组织肉瘤的肿瘤分级:磁共振成像纹理分析预测
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 2;99(27):e20880. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020880.
9
Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI for the differentiation of benign from malignant soft-tissue tumors.弥散加权(DWI)和动态对比增强(DCE)MRI 对良恶性软组织肿瘤的鉴别诊断性能。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Sep;50(3):798-809. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26607. Epub 2019 Jan 20.
10
Added-value of advanced magnetic resonance imaging to conventional morphologic analysis for the differentiation between benign and malignant non-fatty soft-tissue tumors.高级磁共振成像对常规形态分析在鉴别良恶性非脂肪性软组织肿瘤中的附加价值。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Mar;31(3):1536-1547. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07190-0. Epub 2020 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Distinguishing benign and malignant myxoid soft tissue tumors: Performance of radiomics vs. radiologists.区分良性和恶性黏液样软组织肿瘤:影像组学与放射科医生的表现
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 27;20(1):e0318072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318072. eCollection 2025.
2
MRI Radiomics Analysis in the Diagnostic Differentiation of Malignant Soft Tissue Myxoid Sarcomas From Benign Soft Tissue Musculoskeletal Myxomas.MRI影像组学分析在鉴别恶性软组织黏液样肉瘤与良性软组织肌肉骨骼黏液瘤中的应用
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2025 Jun;61(6):2630-2641. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29691. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
3
CT and MRI radiomics of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas: an updated systematic review of reproducibility and validation strategies.

本文引用的文献

1
Radiomic features from MRI distinguish myxomas from myxofibrosarcomas.MRI 影像组学特征可区分黏液瘤和黏液纤维肉瘤。
BMC Med Imaging. 2019 Aug 15;19(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12880-019-0366-9.
2
Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis: differentiation of benign from malignant parotid gland tumors using readout-segmented diffusion-weighted imaging.表观扩散系数(ADC)直方图分析:应用分段读出扩散加权成像对腮腺良恶性肿瘤进行鉴别诊断。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019 Oct;48(7):20190100. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20190100. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
3
Diagnosis and Treatment of Myxoid Liposarcomas: Histology Matters.
骨与软组织肉瘤的CT和MRI影像组学:关于可重复性和验证策略的最新系统综述
Insights Imaging. 2024 Feb 27;15(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01614-x.
4
A novel approach correlating pathologic complete response with digital pathology and radiomics in triple-negative breast cancer.一种新方法将三阴性乳腺癌的病理完全缓解与数字病理学和放射组学相关联。
Breast Cancer. 2024 May;31(3):529-535. doi: 10.1007/s12282-024-01544-y. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
5
Differentiation of neurogenic tumours and pleomorphic adenomas in the parapharyngeal space based on texture analysis of T2WI.基于 T2WI 纹理分析对咽旁间隙神经源性肿瘤和多形性腺瘤的鉴别诊断。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Aug 9;23(1):548. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03283-6.
黏液样脂肪肉瘤的诊断与治疗:组织学很重要。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2018 Oct 25;19(12):64. doi: 10.1007/s11864-018-0590-5.
4
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Grading of Cartilaginous Bone Tumors: Added Value of Quantitative Texture Analysis.基于磁共振成像的软骨性骨肿瘤分级:定量纹理分析的附加价值。
Invest Radiol. 2018 Nov;53(11):663-672. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000486.
5
Homogeneous myxoid liposarcomas mimicking cysts on MRI: A challenging diagnosis.MRI 上均质黏液样脂肪肉瘤酷似囊肿:一种具有挑战性的诊断。
Eur J Radiol. 2018 May;102:41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
6
Tumor spatial heterogeneity in myxoid-containing soft tissue using texture analysis of diffusion-weighted MRI.使用扩散加权磁共振成像的纹理分析评估含黏液样软组织中的肿瘤空间异质性
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 14;12(7):e0181339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181339. eCollection 2017.
7
Soft tissue masses with myxoid stroma: Can conventional magnetic resonance imaging differentiate benign from malignant tumors?具有黏液样基质的软组织肿块:传统磁共振成像能否区分良性肿瘤与恶性肿瘤?
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Oct;85(10):1875-1882. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.08.015. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
8
Soft-tissue myxomatous lesions: review of salient imaging features with pathologic comparison.软组织黏液瘤样病变:显著影像特征回顾及病理对照
Radiographics. 2014 Jul-Aug;34(4):964-80. doi: 10.1148/rg.344130110.
9
MR imaging of myxofibrosarcoma and undifferentiated sarcoma with emphasis on tail sign; diagnostic and prognostic value.黏液纤维肉瘤和未分化肉瘤的磁共振成像,重点关注尾征;诊断和预后价值。
Eur Radiol. 2014 Aug;24(8):1749-57. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3181-2. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
10
MRI of superficial soft tissue masses: analysis of features useful in distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions.MRI 对表浅软组织肿块的分析:有助于鉴别良恶性病变的特征。
Skeletal Radiol. 2012 Dec;41(12):1517-24. doi: 10.1007/s00256-012-1385-6. Epub 2012 Apr 12.