• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩语语篇中主格标记和话题标记的选择

Choice of nominative and topic markers in Korean discourse.

作者信息

Hwang Heeju

机构信息

Department of Linguistics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Apr;76(4):905-921. doi: 10.1177/17470218221103544. Epub 2022 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1177/17470218221103544
PMID:35588294
Abstract

In two written sentence completion experiments, I tested whether the choice of nominative and topic markers is subserved by the same mechanisms as anaphor choice and referent choice in Korean. I found that morphological marker choice was sensitive to various factors including connective, grammatical role, and verb semantics, whereas anaphor choice was sensitive only to grammatical role. I also found that morphological marker choice did not systematically vary with verb semantics unlike referent choice. These findings reveal two important properties of referential form production. One is that morphological marker choice relies on different mechanisms than underlie anaphor choice and referent choice. Another is that connective plays a significant role in determining referential form. Despite its role in referent choice and pronoun comprehension, connective has received little attention in current models of referential form production. The current study is the first to systematically test the effect of connective on referential form choice and to demonstrate its effect on morphological marker choice. By revealing how morphological marker choice is related to anaphor choice and referent choice, and identifying the factors that influence morphological marker choice, the results of the study improve our theoretical understanding of morphological marker production and reference production.

摘要

在两项书面句子完成实验中,我测试了韩语中主格和话题标记的选择是否与指代选择和所指对象选择受相同机制的支配。我发现形态标记的选择对包括连接词、语法角色和动词语义在内的各种因素敏感,而指代选择仅对语法角色敏感。我还发现形态标记的选择不像所指对象选择那样随动词语义系统地变化。这些发现揭示了指称形式产生的两个重要特性。一个是形态标记的选择所依赖的机制不同于指代选择和所指对象选择所依据的机制。另一个是连接词在确定指称形式方面起着重要作用。尽管连接词在确定所指对象和代词理解中发挥作用,但在当前的指称形式产生模型中却很少受到关注。本研究首次系统地测试了连接词对指称形式选择的影响,并证明了其对形态标记选择的影响。通过揭示形态标记选择与指代选择和所指对象选择之间的关系,并确定影响形态标记选择的因素,该研究的结果增进了我们对形态标记产生和指称产生的理论理解。

相似文献

1
Choice of nominative and topic markers in Korean discourse.韩语语篇中主格标记和话题标记的选择
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Apr;76(4):905-921. doi: 10.1177/17470218221103544. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
2
The influence of discourse continuity on referential form choice.语篇连贯性对指称形式选择的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2023 Apr;49(4):626-641. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001166. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
3
Referential Chains Reveal Predictive Processes and Form-to-Function Mapping: An Electroencephalographic Study Using Naturalistic Story Stimuli.指称链揭示预测过程与形式到功能的映射:一项使用自然故事刺激的脑电图研究
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 19;12:623648. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.623648. eCollection 2021.
4
The effects of discourse coherence on the persistence of sentence structures.语篇连贯对句子结构持久性的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2024 Jan;50(1):137-160. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001295. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
5
Verbal Semantics Drives Early Anticipatory Eye Movements during the Comprehension of Verb-Initial Sentences.言语语义在动词居首句子理解过程中驱动早期预期眼动。
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 9;7:95. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00095. eCollection 2016.
6
Interpretation of verb phrase anaphora: influences of task and syntactic context.动词短语指代的解释:任务和句法语境的影响
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1990 Nov;42(4):675-92. doi: 10.1080/14640749008401244.
7
The development of referential choice in English and Japanese: a discourse-pragmatic perspective.从话语语用学角度看英语和日语中指称选择的发展
J Child Lang. 2006 Nov;33(4):823-57. doi: 10.1017/s030500090600763x.
8
Pronoun interpretation in Mandarin Chinese follows principles of Bayesian inference.汉语代词解释遵循贝叶斯推理原则。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 19;15(8):e0237012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237012. eCollection 2020.
9
The effects of semantic similarity on Mandarin speakers' referential expressions.语义相似性对普通话使用者指称表达的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Nov;76(11):2579-2595. doi: 10.1177/17470218231154578. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
10
Favor referential representations.支持参考性表征。
Brain Lang. 1995 Jun;49(3):224-40. doi: 10.1006/brln.1995.1031.

引用本文的文献

1
Hearing Pronouns Primes Speakers to Use Pronouns.听到代词会促使说话者使用代词。
Open Mind (Camb). 2025 Jan 4;9:47-69. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00178. eCollection 2025.
2
The role of grammatical role and thematic role predictability in reference form production in Mandarin Chinese.语法角色和题元角色可预测性在汉语指称形式生成中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 4;13:930572. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.930572. eCollection 2022.